On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Saad, Salma wrote:
So it looks like I cannot have a textfield inside of a span.
I think that in HTML, span isn't supposed to contain any
tags.
- Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
On 6/20/07, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh yeah, be sure you DO NOT test your wicket app's scalability with
wicket in development mode!
Ah yes, I figured that out the hard way. Big difference.
Just thought I'd mention that if you need a realistic application built on
Wicket +
Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail wrote:
Nie magu panimayet stonibuts.
:-) Russian Wicket Users Group - interested?
cannot understand anything.
f(t)
what do you mean?
--
Andrew Klochkov
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by
hi juergen,
actually, your example code doesn't add any css but only javascript. ;-)
i attached a simple example which shows the problem. the page - if correctly
rendered - should have a yellow background, but hasn't. the line
add( HeaderContributor.forCss( CSS ) );
doesn't lead to the
I guess you have to pay a price for the ease and convenience of Wicket. I
don't know if I want to pay that price. Depends on the application and the
target users I guess. At least I want to reduce the pain for the user. As
been pointed out by Eelco and Maurice, there are some possibilities to do
Hi guys,
We're currently running some performance tests on our Wicket 1.2.4-based
application using loadrunner. We're seeing a high level of failed requests
(in the order of 50%, I am told), which is preventing us taking this
further. My suspicion is that there's an issue with the loadrunner
How can I set up page parameters in link using some javascript. I have DOJO
tree, and javascript function that gets sting with selected item, and I have
a link to page with 1 parameter, that string, how to setup dynamic page link
construction ? Or how can I get JS function result to java ... or
I just looked up the spec, and the span tag is really allowed to
contain other elements, specifically formcontrols:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/dtd.html#inline
The span definition is a couple of lines below the provided anchor.
Martijn
On 6/20/07, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for response igor. In answer to your question, yes we've overridden
isVisible to be of form :-
public boolean isVisible() {
return getXXX() != null;
}
where getXXX() might be getModelObject() or some other instance variable etc
whose presence would mean data values
and I Frederikssund:)
Frank Bille wrote:
On 6/19/07, *Flemming Boller* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I would like to show up also.
I come from Borup, but work in copenhagen.
Funny, I come from Viby Sjælland.
Frank
So I guess we should be some where above the minumum limit:)
What topics are people interested in hearing about?
I would really like to here something about testing with wicket.
regards Nino
Flemming Boller wrote:
Hello
I would like to show up also.
I come from Borup, but work in
Mats Norén wrote:
Sorry guys for jumping in this late in the game, but has has anyone
considered writing a contrib for OpenLayers[1]?
OpenLayers covers a lot of the functionality of the GMap client and is
open source with a BSD license.
Some of the features:
- Vector support for displaying
Well I think youre correct. But I would also hate if any of the great
stuff from both projects was lost in migration.. Lets wait a bit the n
and see where end:)
regards Nino
Martin Funk wrote:
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael schrieb:
I completely agree. So I'd like for us to
I was also thinking about having a little drink or something, to celebrate
that Wicket is (hopefully) an Apache top level project. Copenhagen is
perhaps too small to make some noise in, but I think we should try :)
It could be at the same time as some wicket introduction/go-home
Hello,
On my html page I have an iframe = iframe wicket:id=iframe/iframe
Early code :
WebMarkupContainer iframe = new WebMarkupContainer(iframe);
Then I set the src for my iframe with a SimpleMarkupContainer =
iframe.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(src,
urlFor(PageMap.forName(MyPageMap),
Hi folks,
I've just implemented Google Guice integration for Wicket 1.3.x.
For more details, see here:
- http://herebebeasties.com/2007-06-20/wicket-gets-guicy/
Please note that due to the magic proxying of stuff, it only supports
field injection at the moment.
Any bug reports/feature
Hi Al,
I've just implemented Google Guice integration for Wicket 1.3.x.
that's simply just great news! :) Thanx for your efforts on this! :))
Best regards, --- Jan.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
There is indeed a little bit of info in the javadoc (but on the Page class).
Is there something more you can help with to below questions?
howzat wrote:
I didn't find anything to read describing how and when to use PageMap and
how it works?
Are there any examples showing what can be done
Hi,
We're in the middle of upgrading one of our apps from wicket 1.2.6 to
1.3(finally :)). Sadly, we're running into a small problem which we
don't know
how to get around.
In our 1.2.6 version we had an utility class to set up previous page links
based on the PageMap. It went something like
1.3.0 (pretty recent build)/ Java5
I was thinking about this some more. I believe (either due to autoboxing or
standard reflection) that my primitive float if being returned from the
PropertyResolver as a Float object, not the float primitive that it is
defined as. As a result, the getObject()
This issue was fixed in trunk on 2007-06-18 at 15:04 in r548362.
Regards,
Al
ChuckDeal wrote:
I have a custom Model that extends PropertyModel. I attach an instance of
that model that wraps a float value (not Float). As a result,
FormComponent.typeName gets set automatically to float.
Argh! I was running r548356!
Thanks, I'll build again..
Chuck
Al Maw wrote:
This issue was fixed in trunk on 2007-06-18 at 15:04 in r548362.
Regards,
Al
ChuckDeal wrote:
I have a custom Model that extends PropertyModel. I attach an instance
of
that model that wraps a float
Sure. Lets see if we can fit it in..
:)
Frank Bille wrote:
I was also thinking about having a little drink or something, to
celebrate that Wicket is (hopefully) an Apache top level project.
Copenhagen is perhaps too small to make some noise in, but I think we
should try :)
It could be
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Seldon, Richard wrote:
Thanks for response igor. In answer to your question, yes we've overridden
isVisible to be of form :-
public boolean isVisible() {
return getXXX() != null;
}
isVisible() can be called several times during the request
cycle. One
kanieshna, Ya ochin intersna
Я заинтересован
About the jira I meant.
f(t)
On 6/20/07, Andrew Klochkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail wrote:
Nie magu panimayet stonibuts.
:-) Russian Wicket Users Group - interested?
cannot understand anything.
f(t)
what do you
Al Maw wrote:
I've just implemented Google Guice integration for Wicket 1.3.x.
For more details, see here:
- http://herebebeasties.com/2007-06-20/wicket-gets-guicy/
Please note that due to the magic proxying of stuff, it only supports
field injection at the moment.
It now also
Cheers Al, nice job!
Eelco
On 6/20/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just implemented Google Guice integration for Wicket 1.3.x.
For more details, see here:
- http://herebebeasties.com/2007-06-20/wicket-gets-guicy/
Please note that due to the magic proxying of stuff,
On 6/20/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So I guess we should be some where above the minumum limit:)
What topics are people interested in hearing about?
Perhabs we could start up and discuss about some of the projects we have
used Wicket in?
And I think a
Sounds good. Do you guys think we should try to find a date soon (like in
early july) or should we wait to august. I have time to arrange something in
august, but not in july.
Would you prefer go-home meetings (weekdays after work) or weekends?
Frank
On 6/20/07, Flemming Boller [EMAIL
Dear Sirs,
When we started using Wicket in our project one of the major
motivation was its support for Portlet implementation.
This week, we have migrated our wicket-implemented WebApp to
PortletApp, asuring there are no compilations errors, and everything
seems to go right.
Now we need to pack
http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=13974local=yquery=portlet+support
On 6/20/07, manuel barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs,
When we started using Wicket in our project one of the major
motivation was its support for Portlet implementation.
This week, we have migrated our
But even if I would accept the usability penalty of the expiring pages, I'm
surrounded by usability experts who will never do that. Moreover a very long
session timeout won't be accepted by others.
But if you require your users to be logged in, what alternatives are
left then? Even if you
Thanks, Igor, I switched to radiogroup/radio, however I still have issues
because I want to add the textfield to just a few of the options, my options
should look like
tr wicket:id=options
td
input type=radio wicket:id=workflowoption /input
/td
td
I solved my issue by using setEscapeModelStrings(false) which works now and
sending extra html to the label in the option. Thanks so much for your help.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
use radiogroup/radio components instead
-igor
On 6/19/07, Saad, Salma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to
That's all very helpful. I just wanted to be sure that we aren't
going to be pushing the envelope for Wicket's known performance
signature.
At this point my primary focus is on using models efficiently and
determining whether we are otherwise structuring things in an
inefficient manner.
Thank
Martijn,
Does threads are very nice, but also very tangled to understand What
is the actual situation of Wicket Portlet vs Currently
Those-Techs-Users!
Would you mind breafing, at least, what should we do to secure-test
and run our Wicket-Portleted application? I mean, should we move to
That's all very helpful. I just wanted to be sure that we aren't
going to be pushing the envelope for Wicket's known performance
signature.
At this point my primary focus is on using models efficiently and
determining whether we are otherwise structuring things in an
inefficient manner.
Does threads are very nice, but also very tangled to understand What
is the actual situation of Wicket Portlet vs Currently
Those-Techs-Users!
Would you mind breafing, at least, what should we do to secure-test
and run our Wicket-Portleted application? I mean, should we move to
On 6/20/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you're on Wicket 1.2.6, use the portlet support that comes with
that.
+1
For 1.3 and onwards, you should be able to run any Wicket
applications/ pages just as a portlets without further fuzzing around.
At least, that's what Ate has been
i just got another missing stack trace problem:
[...]
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
then no stack trace for the NPE. eelco earlier asserted that my logging
config must be wrong while johan said we must have a problem. the only odd
bit of configuration in our log4j file is this
Hi guys, from a discarded framework to the choice in hand. Wicket was chosen
by my company to start a migration project of its products.
Is there a way to get latest 1.3 beta2 with java 1.5?
to get started... ;-)
Thanks to ALL of you for all your help.
ELCO... THE BOOK MAN. COME ON!!!
If you can, start testing early and use a profiler to find any
bottlenecks. And if you find something, please report! :) For instance
on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-626
Eelco
I definitely will.
-
This
Congratulations!
And beta 2 is coming possibly next weekend. Otherwise, just use
the snapshots.
Martijn
On 6/20/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys, from a discarded framework to the choice in hand. Wicket was chosen
by my company to start a migration
could this be caused by this thread (which we never quite did finish)?
http://www.nabble.com/abbreviated-stack-traces-tf3837742.html#a10899418
Jonathan Locke wrote:
i just got another missing stack trace problem:
[...]
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
then no stack trace
Martijn,
Was this ever fixed for 1.2.x? The link below gives the error Only Group
Members Can View Private ArtifactTypes.
Thanks,
Julian
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I already created a bug report:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1501513group_id=119783atid=684975
It
afaik we do not use it on serverside.
as far as spoofing goes, the url itself is already session-relative so it is
already pretty hard to spoof :)
-igor
On 6/20/07, Russell, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
We're currently running some performance tests on our Wicket 1.2.4-based
first mount your receiving page
then when constructing javascript call urlfor(mountedpageclass)
that will give you the base url, pass that into the javascript
in javascript just append the params before you are ready to call
by default wicket uses /paramname/paramvalue
so in javascript
that code in the ajax link is incorrect
this line:
newIframe.replaceWith(iframe);
should actually be
iframe.replaceWith(newIframe);
-igor
On 6/20/07, Marieke Vandamme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On my html page I have an iframe = iframe wicket:id=iframe/iframe
Early code :
pagamap is mostly an internal construct. you are not meant to pull pages out
of it yourself.
best thing is to pass references around. if you dont want to then keep a
list of previously used pages in session yourself. you should rather even
keep references to page.getpagemapentry() which is what
you either have to pass a reference, keep a reference to last page in
session, or not use the second level page store.
-igor
On 6/20/07, Ivo van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're in the middle of upgrading one of our apps from wicket 1.2.6 to
1.3(finally :)). Sadly, we're running
yes, that is what i was going to suggest as well.
from the stack trace in the orig email it looks like your submit button's
isvisible() doesnt work quiet right.
it returns true when the form renders, but returns false _while_ the form is
being processed, so wicket thinks that you somehow
so you call those methods before the constructor is finished right? i bet
that is going to get n00bs into interesting troubles. i hope you have good
javadoc about that :)
-igor
On 6/20/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al Maw wrote:
I've just implemented Google Guice integration for
Great news Francisco,
So give us the dirt, what made your company ultimately go with wicket?
Which other frameworks where you considering.
-Craig
Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail wrote:
Hi guys, from a discarded framework to the choice in hand. Wicket was
chosen
by my company to start a
On 6/20/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you either have to pass a reference, keep a reference to last page in
session, or not use the second level page store.
If you put:
protected ISessionStore newSessionStore() {
return new HttpSessionStore(this);
}
in your application object,
For me it would be okay with a go-home-meeting.
Perhabs a pizza inbetween :-)
Just toss up some dates. second tuesday in july?
/Flemming
On 6/20/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. Do you guys think we should try to find a date soon (like in
early july) or should we wait
Hi All,
I just created my first Wicket-based demo project -- I like the
framework and have been demonstrating it to my colleagues.
I have a web page that consists of a form and a panel. The form data is
used by some backend process that returns
a very long string. The string is formatted and
On 6/20/07, Flemming Boller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me it would be okay with a go-home-meeting.
Perhabs a pizza inbetween :-)
Just toss up some dates. second tuesday in july?
http://www.meetup.com ?
:) Eelco
-
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
so you call those methods before the constructor is finished right? i
bet that is going to get n00bs into interesting troubles. i hope you
have good javadoc about that :)
Yeah. I'm not sure how Guice handles that internally (i.e. if you're not
even using Wicket).
It's
That's great news, thanks.
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor Vaynberg
Sent: 20 June 2007 18:17
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] random= attribute in requests -- safe to
modify?
afaik we do not use it
OK, thanks for the info Igor.
I guess the idea is that Pages themselves are considered to be disposable
(unless a reference is passed around) and if their state is important, any
underlying model(s) should be maintained by the app and used to set the
Page's components' model state, as
Yes, thanks. We evaluated the following frameworks:
Struts-2 (reviewed by me)
SpringMVC (reviewed by a coworker)
JFS (reviewed by a coworker)
Click (reviewed by a coworker)
Wicket (reviewed by a cowerker and then by me in a second chance kind of
deal)
Other-ones (Tapestry, Webworks, etc) where
What i would do is a bit different.
You want a stack of the last rendered pages?
if you have a common BasePage then override:
protected void onBeforeRender()
in that method you take your session and add a object that stores the page
id and the current version number entry.
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Original Message
Subject: Apache Board Meeting, June 20, 2007 (new officers!)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:45:06 -0700
This sounds great! We recently rewrote zoomf.com using Wicket and had a
brilliant experience. I can give a demo and code walkthru, if this is of
interest.
Our office at 1 Alie Street, Algate, will be available as a venue, if
required. There are a few decent drinking establishments nearby as well
Awesome! Let me be the first to say ...
So when is beta 2 coming out? 8^)=
On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Original
Pizza and a glass of champagne... Wicket = Apache Wicket :)
Frank
On 6/20/07, Flemming Boller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me it would be okay with a go-home-meeting.
Perhabs a pizza inbetween :-)
Just toss up some dates. second tuesday in july?
/Flemming
On 6/20/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL
Great news! Congratulation!
Paolo
On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Original Message
Subject: Apache Board
Congrats, folks! I predict a new swell of mailing list users. :)
On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Original Message
Cool, congratulations gefeliciteerd! ;)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Original Message
Subject: Apache Board Meeting, June 20, 2007 (new
Good news, great job!
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Original Message
Subject: Apache Board Meeting, June 20, 2007 (new officers!)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
!!! Champagne !!!
Many well-deserved congratulations to all of the wicket team!
Arnout
I've created a solution that works for me. See
http://blogstoyevskys-javajourney.blogspot.com/2007/06/ajax-enabled-radio-group-for-wicket-12x.html
this post .
Julian
JulianS wrote:
Is there a backport for this to 1.2.x? Or a hint of how to do it? I really
could use it.
Thanks,
Julian
what version of wicket are you using? can you figure out which url causes
that warning?
-igor
On 6/20/07, Hiller, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I just created my first Wicket-based demo project -- I like the framework
and have been demonstrating it to my colleagues.
I have a web
Evan Chooly wrote:
Awesome! Let me be the first to say ...
So when is beta 2 coming out? 8^)=
;-)
This weekend. Martijn is even going to document how to do that, so
someone else can roll an rc1/beta3 more rapidly, if required.
Rest assured that we're now on a final big push to get 1.3
That's great news! I will drink a toast to each and everyone of you
tonight. Congrats on all your hard work.
best,
jim
On 6/20/07, Arnout Engelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache
Kudos to the whole team and community! And wish you the best as a TLP.
Xavier
PS: seeing people promising beers motivate me to get Ivy graduated asap :-)
On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the
James McLaughlin wrote:
That's great news! I will drink a toast to each and everyone of you
tonight. Congrats on all your hard work.
Make sure you book your cab early. And arrange some time to recover
tomorrow morning. It is a big team :-)
Regards, Upayavira
On 6/20/07, Arnout Engelen
Now that Wicket is an official Apache project are there any plans for
moving the mailing lists over? SourceForge's digest mode leaves a lot to
be desired.
Gili
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Now that Wicket is an official Apache project are there any plans for
moving the mailing lists over? SourceForge's digest mode leaves a lot to
be desired.
Yeah, we should do that soon. We'll get to that within a few weeks hopefully.
Eelco
cowwoc wrote:
Now that Wicket is an official Apache project are there any plans for
moving the mailing lists over? SourceForge's digest mode leaves a lot to
be desired.
It will likely happen soon. Though, there's some sense in timing it to
immediately follow the 1.3 release. Then it
very interesting. but i don't agree with the spreadsheet that wicket is not
good
for million clicks per minute sites. with a good back-end architecture
and the
right tuning, wicket ought to be able to sustain that kind of load as well
as
any other web framework. the big difference is that in
congratulations to everyone! i want to thank the whole team for pushing
wicket to this next big stage of growth! wow! we did it!
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level
project within the Apache Software Foundation.
From Greg Stein:
Hello,
I'm working in a very big project with Wicket, but we have a huge form with
more than 20 dropdown lists whose content is loaded from database. This
makes the form loading very slow.
Most of these dropdown lists will not change, so there is no need of loading
them from database. For
Hi,
I want to change a component in html, for example:
*1)Test.html*
html
body
span wicket:id=label/span
br/
a wicket:id=ajaxLinkClick here/a
/body
/html
*2)Test.java*
public class Test extends WebPage {
private int count = 0;
Label label = null;
TextField textField = null;
Another test. If we change the code like this:
//...
AjaxLink ajaxLink = new AjaxLink(ajaxLink) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget request) {
count++;
this.add(label);
request.addComponent(label);
}
};
//...
we still can not get what
Hi
I can see a few things gond wrong here...
1 First in the onclick method , this does not refer to the original parent
to which label was added initially as label is the component u want to
replace
2 When u want to add a new component to replace the original component
in the parent heirarchy
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, ccc rrr wrote:
if (count % 2 == 0)
{
this.add(label);
request.addComponent(label);
}
else
{
this.add(textField);
Sorry, one error in the code:
this.add(...) == this.findPage().add(...)
But the output is the same:(
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-can-we-change-a-component-dynamically-in-Wicket---tf3956267.html#a11226186
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
Sorry, one error in the code:
this.add(...) == this.findPage().add(...)
And we change like above, the output is what we want:)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-can-we-change-a-component-dynamically-in-Wicket---%28ccc-rrr%29-tf3956306.html#a11226195
Sent
add(new FormComponent(staticselect, new PropertyModel(this,
countryname)) {});
select wicket:id=staticselectoption
ought to do it
-igor
On 6/20/07, Toscano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm working in a very big project with Wicket, but we have a huge form
with
more than 20
you can get to outer class scoping easily
for example if that label was inside a panel
class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel(String id) {
super(id);
add(new AjaxLink(link) {
public void onclick(ajaxrequesttarget target) {
// to get a reference to the panel
91 matches
Mail list logo
