Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> I've never worked with T myself, but read a book on it and browsed
> through the source code. The funny thing is that I was about to start
> a proof of concept in it for the company I worked for three years ago.
> But Johan just got out of a project that used it, and e
> I am definitely going to check out 1.3. Any idea when it will become
> less of a "moving target"?
In a couple of weeks. Basically when all the items listed here
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Backporting+features+from+trunk
are backported. We'll announce it on the list when t
4 PM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Framework Evaluation
>
> Right, it should, but if you are not using sticky sessions, the path
> where serialized pages are stored must be accessible from all nodes.
>
> -Matej
>
> On 4/5/07, Eelco Hillen
> In this comparison thread, I've heard Tapestry mentioned, but has
> anyone compared it to Rife? I am also in the middle of the framework
> shopping game, and honestly, it's no fun.
Rife is very different from most frameworks. It's XML heavy and flow
oriented and has 'continuations' as one of it'
In this comparison thread, I've heard Tapestry mentioned, but has
anyone compared it to Rife? I am also in the middle of the framework
shopping game, and honestly, it's no fun.
Jeremy
On Apr 5, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ri
On 4/5/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, it should, but if you are not using sticky sessions, the path
> where serialized pages are stored must be accessible from all nodes.
Yeah, and a clustered environment. Or use a database instead of the
file system. Would be nice to have tha
Right, it should, but if you are not using sticky sessions, the path
where serialized pages are stored must be accessible from all nodes.
-Matej
On 4/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would love nothing more than to have Wicket as the "de facto" where I
> > work. Unfortunate
> I would love nothing more than to have Wicket as the "de facto" where I
> work. Unfortunately, the application server admin is somewhat worried
> about the amount of heap space my app uses. I am working at profiling
> the app to see where the real issue lies. Unfortunately, it has been
> almos
AIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 4:45 PM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Framework Evaluation
>
> On 4/5/07, Weaver, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> several of the .net guys look envious at wicket (especially those that
> have worked with it).
Yeah. I used to work for that company Martijn works for. From what
I've seen, I think Wicket saved Java in that company, as people really
were starting to get tired of Struts/ Maverick/ model 2.
Eelco
> I have never heard any first-hand accounts of Tapestry being all that great
> to work with. I have never used it myself, but I have a couple of buddies
> that work at a company that develops management software for doctors. They
> are in the process of re-writing one of the web apps from the gr
On 4/5/07, Weaver, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They are in the process of re-writing one of the web apps from the ground up
> using Tapestry and all I hear is what a nightmare Tapestry is to work with.
I don't suppose they hear any great stories about Wicket from you? :)
Related to the top
-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Framework Evaluation
We are currently evaluating GWT, Tapestry and Wicket for our company. We
would like to pick one that we can standardize on for the entire company
to build all of our new web products on going forward. I managed to get
Wick
Hi
I was myself looking for a web framework and I've looked at both
Tapestry and Wicket, so I'll quickly give my feeling :
- Tapestry development team switch from major version to major version
without providing a clear migration path for the user. As such, on
Tapestry forums, you got questions of
One strong consideration four our research into using Wicket as the standard
UI framework for our open source projects is the very workflow of our
company. We have a well defined and capable UX team, who design the
interfaces for our applications. Their deliverables include wireframes and
html mo
On 4/4/07, Richard Hogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the info. I've been in the Swing world for 10 years and
> need to come up to speed on the alphabet soup of the Web World in a few
> scant weeks ;-) My knowledge of Ajax is, shall we say, a bit sparse...
>
> Wicket and GWT seem to
Thanks for all the info. I've been in the Swing world for 10 years and
need to come up to speed on the alphabet soup of the Web World in a few
scant weeks ;-) My knowledge of Ajax is, shall we say, a bit sparse...
Wicket and GWT seem to be the most swing-like, and they are both easy to
become prod
And here's one opinion:
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--ajax-libraries---wicket-tf3191437.html#a8870490
Eelco
On 4/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, I have some questions that I hope people can answer, or at least point
> > me in
> > the right direction to look for the
> So, I have some questions that I hope people can answer, or at least point me
> in
> the right direction to look for the answers ;-) I am currently working with
> Wicket 1.2.5…
Wicket 1.3 is much improved, so if you don't mind working on a
development branch that'll be better.
> I have found c
Hi
>
> I have found comparisons between Wicket and Tapestry (and JSF), but none
> between Wicket and GWT. Are there any out there?
Not that I know about. But when evaluating GWT, just don't miss one
fact: No site made by GWT will be crawled by google or any other
crawlers.
> When using GWT, you
We are currently evaluating GWT, Tapestry and Wicket for our company. We
would like to pick one that we can standardize on for the entire company
to build all of our new web products on going forward. I managed to get
Wicket to Round 2 ;-), but our architects have some lingering concerns
that I
We are currently evaluating GWT, Tapestry and Wicket for our company. We
would like to pick one that we can standardize on for the entire company
to build all of our new web products on going forward. I managed to get
Wicket to Round 2 ;-), but our architects have some lingering concerns
that I
22 matches
Mail list logo
