On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Dirk Riehle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I don't know if this has been mentioned already, but there is a mailing
> list about wiki research at large (not just wikipedia research).
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> > thanks Alain! Do you think the two list
Dirk Riehle wrote:
> Well, one reason the Wiki Symposium exists is because there is much wiki
> stuff (research, practice, standards, etc.) outside the Wikimedia scope!
>
> I think some overlap is natural as Wikimedia issues are wiki issues too.
> However, unless you explicitly change the scope
>> I don't know if this has been mentioned already, but there is a mailing list
>> about wiki research at large (not just wikipedia research).
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> thanks Alain! Do you think the two lists overlap much, though? Though
> this list is titled 'Research into Wikimedia c
Cormac Lawler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
Wikiversity would be a good place for a workspace - but I'm not sure if Felipe
was thinking of something more advanced (ie with wiki and other knowledge base
features) as a "one stop shop".
Cormac
I agree with Phoebe and Cormac, Wikiversity could
Did you compare these hand-maintained lists with this:
http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wikipedia
While I'm a big fan of wikis and Wikipedia, obviously, sometimes
specialized applications with the right incentive system can
outperform a more general wiki-based approach.
My hunch is that Bibsonomy do
Cormac Lawler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
Wikiversity would just not compete as a bibliography (it lacks the funky
search algorithms) - though we could import the meta page and start developing
it as a part of a wider wiki research agenda. Wikiversity would be a good place
for a workspace -
> thanks Alain! Do you think the two lists overlap much, though? Though
> this list is titled 'Research into Wikimedia content and communities'
> there's a lot of things applicable to non-Wikimedia research; and by
> extension much wiki research focuses on Wikipedia et al :)
Yes, there is a lot of
On Feb 7, 2008 6:55 AM, Desilets, Alain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't know if this has been mentioned already, but there is a mailing list
> about wiki research at large (not just wikipedia research).
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks Alain! Do you think the two lists overlap muc
Hello all,
I don't know if this has been mentioned already, but there is a mailing list
about wiki research at large (not just wikipedia research).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is also an annual conference called WikiSym, which is also about wiki
research at large:
www.wikisym.org
It's a great c
Andrew Krizhanovsky wrote:
> I think the aclwiki has potential to cover papers and software related
> to Wiki and science.
While that wiki looks quite relevant for the type of wiki(pedia) research *I* am
doing (thanks for the link), I don't think it would be the right place for
general "Wikipedia
Hi, All.
I think the aclwiki has potential to cover papers and software related
to Wiki and science.
http://aclweb.org/aclwiki
Best regards,
Andrew Krizhanovsky.
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikim
Hello All
As I'm currently working on my major thesis about extracting a multilingual
thesaurus from wikipedia data, I have collected quite a bit of research
resources about wikipedia. Here are a few links:
* My Wikipedia Research link collection:
http://del.icio.us/brightbyte/wikipedia%2Bresearc
Thank you Cormac!
I know of 4 lists, perhaps there are even some more:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Bibliography
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedistik
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_in_academic_studies
http://bibliography.wikimedia.de/index.php
was
On Feb 7, 2008 5:10 AM, Piotr Konieczny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> phoebe ayers wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to have a dedicated spot to collect research
> > studies/documentation/work (maybe Wikiversity is the right spot?)
> > since right now it is spread out over several wikipedias, meta, and
phoebe ayers wrote:
> It would be nice to have a dedicated spot to collect research
> studies/documentation/work (maybe Wikiversity is the right spot?)
> since right now it is spread out over several wikipedias, meta, and
> other wikis besides.
About a year ago I have collected most of Wikipedia
I talk to wiki researchers fairly often -- both people who are
involved in projects already documented onwiki and people starting up
new ones in universities, etc -- and I usually suggest that they use
wiki-research-l as a way to get feedback on their ideas. I'm often
told though that it doesn't se
Hi Cormac, hi everbody
I am new to this list and would appreciate sharing ideas / being part
of such a research community.
As far as I see there are allready several wikis that try to collect
persons involved in research:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research
http://de.wikipedia.org/wik
17 matches
Mail list logo
