https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #126 from Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org ---
Filed as bug 47533.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Markus Glaser gla...@hallowelt.biz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gla...@hallowelt.biz
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
bennylin bknl...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bknl...@yahoo.com
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Bug 189 depends on bug 33193, which changed state.
Bug 33193 Summary: Review and deploy Score extension to Wikimedia wikis
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Sam Reed (reedy) s...@reedyboy.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #123 from xmlizer xmli...@gmail.com ---
Congratulations to all !
It makes my dream comes true today !
Thanks million times!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@wikimedia.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #125 from Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #124)
Exciting! Here's a small demo page on en.wp, with midi and Vorbis output
enabled.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eloquence/Score
Only issues
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@wikimedia.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Sumana Harihareswara suma...@panix.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Doug wikipediad...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||35925
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Jan Kucera (Kozuch) garba...@seznam.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Highest
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Bugmeister Bot mhershber...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Highest |Low
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
graf.z...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||graf.z...@gmx.net
--- Comment #116
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Sumana Harihareswara suma...@panix.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Bug 189 depends on bug 29630, which changed state.
Bug 29630 Summary: Make [[mw:Extension:LilyPond]] safe against DoS attacks
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29630
What|Old Value |New Value
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Sumana Harihareswara suma...@panix.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|29630 |33193
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #119 from Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org 2011-12-16
21:32:32 UTC ---
Comitted Lilypond at r98414. Made some modifications to Score in response at
r106459. Awaiting a new review.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
John Du Hart j...@compwhizii.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
mybugs.m...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||29630
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #115 from mybugs.m...@gmail.com 2011-05-21 18:52:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #114)
When I asked Tim about this a while back he said that before it would be
installed on WMF servers that he wanted components addressed, and he
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #113 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2011-05-15
07:19:46 UTC ---
Just fixing the broken ling ov Mark.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LilyPond
What is ment by a working music transcription?
Lilypond is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #114 from Andrew Billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com 2011-05-15
10:41:17 UTC ---
When I asked Tim about this a while back he said that before it would be
installed on WMF servers that he wanted components addressed, and he added his
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Ashar Voultoiz has...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1141|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #110 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2010-11-11
14:58:57 UTC ---
Is it helpfull to mark it as obsolete?
Is there any knowledege, wether this patch must be applied for the new version
too?
It would be much more
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Rob Lanphier (RobLa) ro...@robla.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|need-review |
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #108 from Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de 2010-09-24 00:40:49
UTC ---
The reason that there is no specific, read-to-deploy extension to review is
that it took such a preposterously long time to get anywhere that the original
author
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #106 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2010-09-08
19:15:43 UTC ---
Could this be a solution/compromiss. MusixTex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusiXTeX. It seems to be completely Tex-based.
Because we have tex already
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #105 from Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org 2010-03-31
06:05:32 UTC ---
Further to that: note that PostScript is a Turing complete language.
ImageMagick invokes Ghostscript, which is a complete implementation of it. You
can do fun
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #104 from JeLuF je...@gmx.de 2010-03-31 05:54:40 UTC ---
Is there a recent version of the Lilypond extension available? It should be
added to SVN for final review.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #102 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-11-29
16:01:00 UTC ---
The ABC extension still seems like the most likely choice (because it's passed
security review by a root), but it apparently needs some changes,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #99 from JOHANN relatividadgene...@hotmail.com 2009-11-29
04:38:49 UTC ---
Ok, I think I undesrtood why lilypond is not suitable to wiki projects. What
about if any developers could help us trying to implement jmusic? As I see,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #100 from JOHANN relatividadgene...@hotmail.com 2009-11-29
04:40:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #90)
I think there is one big misunderstanding here.
Most of the people who are requesting a music module arn't developers,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #101 from JOHANN relatividadgene...@hotmail.com 2009-11-29
04:48:00 UTC ---
At this moment, after 5 years, I'm not concerned about what language should be
implemented. I think that ABC, Lilypond, Jmusic, etc., is good enough in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
fcojavier roa fcojavier@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #95 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-07-14
18:21:22 UTC ---
OpenOffice runs on client machines and does not have to worry about DoS. If a
file uses too much CPU to render, the user can just close the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #96 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-07-14
21:12:27 UTC ---
It schould be easy to run it on a lower priority and with a high nice level on
a Unix maschine if there is any interest to do so.
The open office was
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #97 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-07-14
22:08:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #96)
It schould be easy to run it on a lower priority and with a high nice level
No, this is not enough. At best, it limits
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Martin Fischer martinfi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #94 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-07-14
05:54:50 UTC ---
Even Open Office has now a module to incorporate lilypond.
Have a look here http://ooolilypond.sourceforge.net/
Why is this not possible to do the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #92 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-05-10
13:43:34 UTC ---
It seems clear that there will be no fixed list of requirements. Either a
LilyPond dev is willing to put in the work and submit it for eventual
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #89 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 10:04:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #88)
Just to put things straight: there was _no_ proper this extension is not
accepted because This is inacceptable, even from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #90 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-05-09
11:20:37 UTC ---
I think there is one big misunderstanding here.
Most of the people who are requesting a music module arn't developers, neither
wikimedia nor
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #91 from nolaiz naelw...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 12:14:11 UTC ---
Hi,
Tired of see that this doesn't seems to solve anything (afer 5 years), I wrote
to Jimbo this mail with my thoughts.
I think the matter is if music have enough
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #87 from Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org 2009-05-08
18:02:56 UTC ---
Aryeh has asked me to reply to comment 81 since he believes it asks
interesting questions.
(In reply to comment #81)
Well, as I saw at Comment #55
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Magnus Eriksson mang...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mang...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #86 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2009-05-06 14:47:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #84)
Hi all. I want to post a comment i did in 2007...i feel pity because nothing
has changed since that year. Maybe i have to give
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #72 from frank.br...@rz.uni-regensburg.de 2009-05-05 07:33:32 UTC
---
All I can do is to agree to Johann. Musicians do really need a tool for writing
music like mathematicians do need their TeX for writing formulae. And math
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #74 from Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de 2009-05-05 09:27:47
UTC ---
Okay, to be _really_ frank, this whole talking in the wrong place (security
issues should be raised with the maintainers! That should be _obvious_!) and
the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #75 from frank.br...@rz.uni-regensburg.de 2009-05-05 09:45:24 UTC
---
to Dscho: I understand you're dissappointed and/or dissatisfied and/or annoyed,
I don't really know exactly which one of these, since you invested some work
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #76 from Helder heldergeov...@gmail.com 2009-05-05 13:04:13 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #75)
But I'd suggest, to stick to the facts and to stay sober and to keep emotions
out of the discussion. Arguments like your 1)-3) are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #77 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-05-05
14:03:34 UTC ---
There has been no politicking here with regards to ABC vs. LilyPond. Tim
Starling is the most likely to enable either, and he's said (comment #40)
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #78 from Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de 2009-05-05 15:38:18
UTC ---
Aryeh: thank you for proving all my points.
And I mean all of them.
That very much includes the unwillingness to clarify with the LilyPond team how
serious
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #80 from Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de 2009-05-05 15:59:41
UTC ---
Roan: if you have a problem with MediaWiki, no matter if real or perceived,
whom do you ask? Exactly. The developers. Not some random obscure bug
tracker.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #81 from Helder heldergeov...@gmail.com 2009-05-05 16:30:44 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #77)
(In reply to comment #76)
I think Dscho said what is most rational _to do_: Since #49 there was no
comments from the Wikimedia
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #82 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-05-05
16:58:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #81)
Well, as I saw at Comment #55 and at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-02/msg00022.html
the item
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #83 from JOHANN relatividadgene...@hotmail.com 2009-05-06
02:55:03 UTC ---
Hi all. I want to post a comment i did in 2007...i feel pity because nothing
has changed since that year. Maybe i have to give up music and become a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #84 from JOHANN relatividadgene...@hotmail.com 2009-05-06
03:08:00 UTC ---
Hi all. I want to post a comment i did in 2007...i feel pity because nothing
has changed since that year. Maybe i have to give up music and become a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #71 from JOHANN relatividadgene...@hotmail.com 2009-05-02
05:47:39 UTC ---
There is a place when is allowed to use lilypond code to make sheet music, I
don't remember its name...it is like wiki... and it says it's a sandboard.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Helder heldergeov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heldergeov...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Mike.lifeguard mikelifegu...@fastmail.fm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|shell |
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Wolf Peuker p...@rekoba.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@rekoba.de
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #56 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-01-23
14:26:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #55)
A really rudimentary research into LilyPond's documentation would show that
the
safe
mode relies on GUILEs safe mode,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #58 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-01-23
17:02:14 UTC ---
I've got two points out of this long time discussion (5 years now). Long time
only because there long times of inactivity in between. And it seems not
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #60 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-01-23
17:47:35 UTC ---
Sorry Aryeh Gregor,
I'm not capable of doing the job you wants to urge me todo. :) I' working as a
software engineer but I don't have any experiences
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #61 from Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de 2009-01-23 19:50:56
UTC ---
Sorry to be so frank, but it is _utterly stupid_ not to ask for a really safe
mode on the LilyPond mailing list. It is _Open Source_! They will answer you,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #62 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-01-23
20:22:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #61)
Sorry to be so frank, but it is _utterly stupid_ not to ask for a really
safe
mode on the LilyPond mailing list. It
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #63 from Steve Sanbeg ssan...@web.de 2009-01-23 20:26:05 UTC ---
What we're looking for here is much different from a typical safe mode; the
proposed no scheme mode may be more appropriate, if that gets implemented.
This doesn't
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #64 from Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de 2009-01-23 20:39:08
UTC ---
If you think this should have been brought up on the LilyPond mailing list
Back when I provided my extensions, no such issues were raised. In the
meantime,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #65 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-01-23
20:58:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #64)
Back when I provided my extensions, no such issues were raised. In the
meantime, I got really frustrated. And the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #66 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-01-23
21:33:57 UTC ---
I just want to add may points. It's very easy to say it's our job because we
want to have it. And it's right to some extension. I would talk to the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
Dscho johannes.schinde...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
79 matches
Mail list logo
