Tricky to support *all* languages how, Markus?
(CC WUaS in Wikidata seeks to be in all 7,943+ languages per Glottolog,
beyond Wikipedia's 300).
Thank you,
Scott
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Markus Krötzsch <
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> On 15.02.2016 11:52, Hay (Husky) wrote:
>
On 15.02.2016 11:52, Hay (Husky) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:56 AM, André Costa wrote:
Would it be possible to set the language used to search with? Whilst I most
often use English on Wikidata I'm sure a lot of people don't.
Not yet. The query takes quite a
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:56 AM, André Costa wrote:
> Would it be possible to set the language used to search with? Whilst I most
> often use English on Wikidata I'm sure a lot of people don't.
Not yet. The query takes quite a while, so it's done in realtime but
every 24
Would it be possible to set the language used to search with? Whilst I most
often use English on Wikidata I'm sure a lot of people don't.
/André
On 14 Feb 2016 22:03, "Markus Kroetzsch"
wrote:
> On 14.02.2016 18:03, Hay (Husky) wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Hay (Husky) wrote:
> considering number of times a property is used:i think that would be
> really interesting. Unfortunately, i don't know of a way to easily get
> a count of how many times a property is used.
Is this sill an issue or did a
On 14.02.2016 18:03, Hay (Husky) wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Markus Kroetzsch
wrote:
I suspect that https://query.wikidata.org can count how many times each
property is used.
Amazingly, you can (I was surprised):
Well done! Absolutely love it! I'm already using it to build SPARQL
queries for the wikidata visualizations [1].
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Sparql
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Hay (Husky) wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> it seems we're getting new properties
On 14.02.2016 16:04, Hay (Husky) wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
Now I suddenly understand why we should have "properties for properties" so
we can categorize these things. It would be nice to have a list of
"authority control" properties and
Awesome, thanks! :)
-- Hay
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
wrote:
> Well done! Absolutely love it! I'm already using it to build SPARQL queries
> for the wikidata visualizations [1].
>
> [1]: http://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Sparql
>
> On Sun,
Now I suddenly understand why we should have "properties for properties"
so we can categorize these things. It would be nice to have a list of
"authority control" properties and also the number of times a property is
used.
Maybe there is a way to organize the metadata so a "property property"
I suspect that https://query.wikidata.org can count how many times each
property is used.
On Feb 14, 2016 17:54, "Jane Darnell" wrote:
> Now I suddenly understand why we should have "properties for properties"
> so we can categorize these things. It would be nice to have a
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
> Now I suddenly understand why we should have "properties for properties" so
> we can categorize these things. It would be nice to have a list of
> "authority control" properties and also the number of times a property is
Wow Hay, this is super useful
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Hay (Husky) wrote:
> Awesome, thanks! :)
>
> -- Hay
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
> wrote:
> > Well done! Absolutely love it! I'm already using it to build SPARQL
>
Very nice. Showing the shortened property classifications under "use" is
a very good idea!
Markus
On 14.02.2016 15:11, Jane Darnell wrote:
Wow Hay, this is super useful
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Hay (Husky) > wrote:
Awesome, thanks! :)
On 14.02.2016 16:06, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
I suspect that https://query.wikidata.org can count how many times each
property is used.
Amazingly, you can (I was surprised):
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Markus Kroetzsch
wrote:
>> I suspect that https://query.wikidata.org can count how many times each
>> property is used.
>
>
> Amazingly, you can (I was surprised):
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo