Hoi,
I am getting so pissed off.
Let us be realistic. The user experience sucks ... It sucks big time and
even though the community is comfortable with it, it impedes the use by
the people we do it all for. They are the READERS.. they are not the
editors and the least this is done for are the
Gerard,
I believe that the disputes about MediaViewer are mostly about the desktop
platform's version, as most editors use the desktop platform to edit.
In general terms, I have yet to hear someone say that the Mobile platform
is a low development priority. I am familiar with Mobile-l. Mobile
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.com
wrote:
how should this be solved?
To me it's saying that no matter who is informed, the WMF can never expect
that their work won't be overruled.
That is problematic (regardless of who has the final authority)
A
Hoi,
I am afraid you do not get the point. The point is that the desktop as we
know it is our history. It is like the Dodo; something that is best
experienced in the museum to be replaced by something contemporary in the
real world. The development of a single UI is what you should consider and
Hoi,
David, who is the community and how do you get members of the community
recognise and respect the decisions it does not like that are taken on
their behalf by its representatives. We do not have one community, we
have many. The interests people aim for are diverse and all too often
Gerard,
I don't think anyone is insisting on the status quo. But we do expect that
improvements be, well, better than what they improve. Breaking attribution
for our media files, or hiding it by requiring a click, is not an
improvement. The people who created and uploaded that media deserve their
On 15 August 2014 06:08, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Developing for mobile is nice and should continue, but desktop is far from
dead. I don't even try to edit from mobile; I want my real keyboard and
monitor, not the crappy on screen one and 3 display.
This is a false dilemma. The