GerardM,
As much as I agree with you on many things related to Wikimania, your
statement about en.wp and USA being “over subsidized” is off base.
For the last few years I’ve held my tongue as American applicants get a
fraction of 10% of all the funding for Wikimania scholarships. That’s
because
If we want to talk about the cost of Wikimania it will be great if the WMF
and the local team will share the costs.
Until now Wikimania London didn't published anything:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014/Budget
And also Mexico:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2015/Budget
2016-02-10 6:06 GMT+01:00 Samuel Klein :
> FUDCons
Also it is hard to compare Wikimanias with FUDCons as it is
a) much smaller (usually bo more than 200 attendees)
b) divided by regions - for example in 2015 there were 3 FUDCons
(Argentina, India, Spain) and 2 Flocks (NY and
The US may be too geographically spread out to develop a robust chapter
system. We have vibrant chapters in a few dense population areas.
Wikimedia District of Columbia is particularly awesome. But for most US
editors there isn't a critical mass of editors in some areas. Often we
work with with
Congratulations Seddon! I'm really glad that's worked out, and I'm
looking forward to continuing to work with you in your new role.
All the best
Michael
Lisa Gruwell wrote:
Hi All-
I am happy to announce that Joseph Seddon (User:Seddon) has joined the
Advancement team to lead up our
Hi Andrew,
*For the last few years I’ve held my tongue as American applicants get a
> fraction of 10% of all the funding for Wikimania scholarships.*
>
Actually you are looking at the old numbers. Both Wikimanias 2015 and 2016
uses a new method of selection. Now, the Global North*[1] *has 25%
"We also do not have a strong chapter system"
This has always puzzled me, because I am a firm believer in the chapter
system, despite its faults and limitations. Isn't it time to address this
for the more active areas of the USA?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Lih
Hoi,
There is only one argument that I cannot refute about American money. It is
American money that gets us the bulk of our funding. The one obvious reason
is that the fund-raising is targeting the USA. When money is spend, it is
spend predominantly in the USA and targeted for Wikipedia and
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> I found this the most interesting part of the recent IdeaLab discussion
> about changing the Wikimania framework.
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Towards_a_New_Wikimania
>
> "*The total spend by WMF for
Béria L,
Yes, I was heartened to see that the formula had changed in 2015. But the
complexity of the algorithm made it hard to discern what the eventual
impact and numbers were for US-based editors. If you have good stats on
this, I’d appreciate a pointer.
Again, I agree that Wikimania should
Hi Wikimedians,
The "chapter system" in the US and North America is a work in progress.
In addition to the two full regional chapters (New York City - where I am,
and Washington, DC), there are also usergroups for the New England,
Cascadia/Northwest, and North Carolina Triangle regions, with
I just want to clarify something. I apologize in advance for being
pedantic.
In the US the term Latino is also applied to those of us who live in the
United States who have cultural and ethnic ties to Latin America. Based on
my reading of the selection process those Latinos would not be
Itzik writes:
> If we want to talk about the cost of Wikimania it will be great if the
WMF and the local team will share the costs.
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014/Budget
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2015/Budget
> Maybe I missed something, but it's strange that
Hi everyone,
The Community Engagement department will be hosting an IRC office hour this
Friday, the 12th of February, at 1900 UTC. The topic of this office hour
will be the department's recent reorganization and personnel changes,
including discussion of what characteristics we should be seeking
February is a very busy month with record number of events planned through
out the United States.
Additionally, The Wiki Ed Foundation works with university based education
programs including parts of the United States outside regions covered by
the U.S. Chapters and User groups.
So, although we
Thanks, Katie! I'd definitely love to finally make it to a state of the map
one of these days; I do think database issues will continue to be an issue
for the entire broader movement and I hope Wikimedia will be able to keep
working to integrate maps and other structured data in a healthy way.
Dear Anna! You have a great talent to inspire people. I can never tell you
how much Wikipedia magic I discovered thanks to you. You are a great
Wikipedian, a wonderful teacheer and a beautiful person. Hope that we will
still have a chance to meet on Wikimedia events.
I wish you many great
While everyone keeps looking at the cost thats not the question we should
be asking, because even if the costs were reduced to 500,000, 100,00 or
even 10,000 that doesnt reflect the value we get from the in person
contacts, the global connections the sharing of experiences, learning of
concepts,
Oh :( this is so sad. You were such an inspiration for me. Thank you for
everything that you have done to help Wikimedians of Albania and for me.
All the best for the future <3,
I hope to see you again.
Many hugs,
Greta
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Josh Lim wrote:
From a US perspective, even here in the global north we have plenty of
students and middle-class participants for whom $1500 in travel, food and
lodging plus 5 days away from work, family, or school amounts to a
significant or impossible sacrifice.
Perhaps someone could tell us the statistics for
Hoi,
To quote a Wikipedia maxim .. "citation needed". It is one thing to say
that something is costly and, it is. It is another to say that Wikimania is
expensive. It is expensive when it does not provide a value relative to
costs.
When you compare with Red Hat, you talk about professional
Congratulations Seddon! Ti'n seren!
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A
Hoi,
Pine with all due respect, the USA is not the problem and English Wikipedia
has been overly subsidised, given way too much attention. Indeed having
more people from the USA attend Wikimania is not a good value proposition.
The USA and Britain is overrepresented as it is.
Thanks,
GerardM
Hi all,
to follow up on Maggie's email, I wanted to share that Program Capacity and
Learning team is reaching out to community members to comment on our draft
roadmap [1]. In this coming year, we look forward to our shared learning
and support to leaders across the movement.
Importantly, we could
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Itzik - Wikimedia Israel
wrote:
> If we want to talk about the cost of Wikimania it will be great if the WMF
> and the local team will share the costs.
>
> Until now Wikimania London didn't published anything:
>
Luis, I am very sorry to see you depart, and not only because I accept
the blame for the introduction. :-) Thanks for everything you brought
to WMF; I look forward to our continued path-crossing in the future.
-Kat
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> Hi,
Im curious to see how this might affect Wiki Learning Tec de Monterrey, as we
are both an education program and an affiliate.
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:19:17 -0800
> From: mc...@wikimedia.org
> To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Community Engagement reorg - the
27 matches
Mail list logo