ffective as of our
> resolution dated Thursday, 23 June.
Hi Patricio,
On a pretty miserable day here in the UK, this is really cheering
news. Congratulations to Katherine and well done to the Board for
making a clear decision.
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andr
_
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailt
nt than no fees generally.
>
> Best
> James
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Andrew Gray
> wrote:
>
>> On 8 May 2016 at 21:51, James Heilman wrote:
>> > Yes there are more than 10,000 open access journals. Ours are different
>> in
>> > that we
n fees to authors.
(They only represent a minority of articles published - they tend to
include the smaller ones).
I would agree that there is no shortage of journals in the world.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, g
;> *Voting will end at* 23:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Dennis Tobar
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Just for ask: the final day to cast a vote, is tonight (May 6 23:59:59
>> UTC)
>> > or May 7 23:59:29 UTC?
>> >
>>
-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subj
ree with the first part, but on the second, it's worth noting that
"none" is an acceptable vote in this election. For myself I think
you'd be hard pressed to find *no* candidates you can support from
this round - they seem a pretty good selection - but others no doubt
differ :-).
; metadata
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.o
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>
it state the following day, and circulate them shortly afterwards? It
might still take a little while to get them approved and published,
but we'd still be a step up on where we are now.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia
had:
http://wikilovesmonuments.aq/
(September is not a good monument-hunting month, so I think all
contributors had given us pictures from their existing collections...)
Asaf: wonderful piece as always.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l m
hat involve broad strategy - especially but not only to do
> with WikiData?
Given Denny's long history with Wikimedia and his role in Wikidata, I
would be more concerned about influence working the other way around
;-)
--
- Andrew Gray
portant that we try to avoid too
large a proportion of the board coming from within the SF technology
bubble. This feels like a step sideways in that regard, and it's
unsettling.
(I also agree with his concerns about diversity, but we're not always
great at solving that through t
erating costs were a little under $5m at that
point and getting a 5% return on endowment was a reasonable
expectation.
As Anne points out, though, we do a lot more now than we did then!
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia
t attention.
Still, nothing ventured!
Some projects have restyled the globe logo for special occasions -
that might be another approach to consider.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://me
ed to return to
make the campaign a success, which isn't really a concern for
fundraising. We need to make sure that that channel is open and
visible in some way when they come back.
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikim
_
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wiki
ZMcBride
>
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://list
ic information? It certainly was in 2013; digging
through old emails turns up a link to
https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/290 which
seems to be the voter list from that election.
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
_
they were
cost-neutral - but the cost of running editathons is, in my
experience, not high. There are probably easier savings to be made by
WMF.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wik
kimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@l
ther than just
"xx.xx UTC".
Related point: if we adapt the way history timestamps are displayed,
eg by adding 'UTC', we should be consistent and apply the same
approach to the "old revisions" view of a page, and the "This page was
last modified on..." foote
top of the page. It's very easy for someone to not
notice a general message, especially if they're looking at more than
the first two entries in the history.
If we want to be clever, we could always get JS trickery to display
something like "xx.xx UTC ($localtimezone +5.00)" rathe
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
> http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
> http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
> http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz
> ___
idata transclusions then :-)
Andrew.
On 23 January 2015 at 16:09, Petr Kadlec wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Gray
> wrote:
>
>> The oldid. At the moment, I trust our long-term viability more than a
>> 2014 web-archiving startup, even one with p
__
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listin
imedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andr
;s over six _years_
>>> that the projects could continue operating before needing to ask for money
>>> again. Contrast with e-mails and in-site donation advertising that
>>> suggest that the lights will go off soon if readers don't donate today.
>> Please add my name to t
ace.” – T. Moore
>>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikim
imedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=u
parallel
discussions (not a very frequent issue, but a messy one when needed;
Pine notes this below)
The more nebulous one that has great promise is using Flow for
workflows/processes (which falls out naturally from the integration of
discussions) - this is what Erik describes below as
s/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
__
list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subj
ing list, guidelines at:
>> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
#x27;s duties was essentially "everything
else"; when he was hired there were ten other staff, and by the time
he left there were still only a few dozen.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Staff_and_contractors&oldid=19911
This may explain why "volunteer coordina
erwards.
And, finally - the more you argue for this tangential idea, the more
people are going to ignore any other (reasonable) suggestion you make.
I hope this (sadly lengthy) email constitutes bringing some minor
objections to your attention.
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
__
option.
I haven't been following this case, but I would think saying "let's
figure out what you want to do before we spend a thousand dollars on
it" would be an eminently reasonable position for Marc to take.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
g to compare this with the way we handle Commons
material.)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
erating fruitless discussions.
Agree entirely with this. Not really sure what the original post was
intended to achieve, but it doesn't seem to be doing it...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
http
ters for that, so people understand the usual responses, was a net
> positive.
>
>
> -george william herbert
> george.herb...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from Kangphone
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://met
e for reading
(and usually in fairly constrained circumstances). Direct reuse
doesn't enter into it.
"Open access" is a very multifaceted term. :-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
ht
on since then. Of
course, Wikimedia as a whole had a lot less money in 2005 and we were
all somewhat unclear on what a chapter could actually do ;-)
So it seems a little weird, to me, to create a second charity to do
the job that the first one was created
rs and from within the Wikimedia community. I've seen
vague "it's data, it'll go on Wikidata" a few times, which is a bit like
saying "it's text, it'll go on Wikipedia" ;-)
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
ttle actually done. The resolution is still out
there, though...
Andrew.
* today's surprising fact: a particularly odd contributor tried to
argue for this, at great length, in ~2005. I forget which article on
enwiki it was.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
__
e this circle - encourage
renaming from User:Jane_Smith to User:Jane_Smith_(Megacorp) then back
to User:Jane_Smith, in order to accomodate changes over time.
Of course, this would have other side-effects - the rename-to-vanish
or rename-for-privacy method we currently use would be impossibl
other reference works) and randomly select from within
*those*, but of course you would still have the fundamental issue that
you're essentially reviewing a selected portion of the project.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
__
g
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wi
stment in these open source products, not ensuring a critical piece of
> our toolkit survives.
>
> Steven
> _______
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wi
Hi Adam,
One thought: you don't really need the date/time data at any detailed
resolution, do you? If what you're wanting it for is to track major
changes ("last month it all switched to this IP") and to purge old
data ("delete anything older than 10 March"), you could simply log day
rather than d
; Do we have a way of indicating that something was graded at a given date ?
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
> On 26 March 2014 22:35, Andrew Gray wrote:
>
>> The WP 1.0 model is pretty good (at least across a sample of a hundred or
>> so articles) but it's quite lab
onal - is not a viable option for next five years
>> > >
>> > > Anders
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_
>> > > contributions_amendment
>> > > _______
>
he world's charities and redirect all their funds to researching
asteroid deflection...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listi
a-l mailing list
> > > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > __
dia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
on is a definite advance - and if
it's a firm no, and we remain in the status quo, we'll have a firm
basis for that in future rather than a sort of decision-by-inertia.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing l
ia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
dia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.
t; ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.o
ubscribe>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Remember that while US caselaw is clear on this point, it is less clear-cut
elsewhere. We at WM tend to take a clear line that 2D reproductions are
ineligible, but it's not a guaranteed absolute truth, particularly in the
UK! We can predict how a court might rule... but they haven't yet, and
claimi
pping us harvesting them individually, of course,
but I think adding a million unidentified images and saying "the
community will sort them out" would be a very quick road to my getting
beaten up ;-)
Andrew.
On 15 December 2013 17:37, Jens Best wrote:
> Just discovered a short note o
regards,
>> > James Salsman
>>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.or
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
_
ikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
__
a bot to scan every edit; it just can't use AbuseFilter
> tags.
>
> Matt Flaschen
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>
ia.org
>> > > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > ___
>> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list
>>
wledge –
>> > > > > > >> www.wikimedia.ch
>> > > > > > >> Skype: charles.andres.wmch
>> > > > > > >> IRC://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-ch
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> __
__
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
__
>> ___
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-
intained, and Flow is barely started.
>
>
> - d.
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@list
> > __**_
>> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org
>> > > Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<
>> > https://lists.wikimedia
ve that we need a visual editor and an
> active group of people are trying to develop one (however haphazardly).
> Rather than simply attack and banish them, I think we should instead focus
> on ways to make it better or make it easier to get it out of the way of
> those who don't
On 3 August 2013 18:50, David Gerard wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 18:46, Andrew Gray wrote:
>
>> I wonder sometimes if maintaining help/documentation pages would be a
>> sensible thing for WMF to have a (part?) time staffer working on, but
>> I guess this gets into the mudd
yle, with 135 word
(!) notice at the top about VE
I wonder sometimes if maintaining help/documentation pages would be a
sensible thing for WMF to have a (part?) time staffer working on, but
I guess this gets into the muddy area of "paying people for volunteer
ta
#x27;d need to
test an integrated environment. Where people aren't going to consult
help pages (say, the login page) it's much simpler.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubsc
ot; tag on all uploads. The
relative rarity of problematic captions meant that I thought a more
explicit disclaimer was probably overkill, compared to (say) the
Bundesarchiv caveats.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l ma
imedia UK and the Eccles Centre for American Studies for
funding this, and to Phil Hatfield at the British Library for
championing the collection!
Andrew.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lis
__
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nicole Ebber
> International Affairs
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 109
ll, and in ten years time
we can say - look, the sky didn't fall, the principle is now accepted, how
about we refine the process?
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing lis
svwiktionary”.
I was wondering if this would ever finally happen!
One ide-effect of centralised renaming: a lot less work for individual
projects and a lot less confusion over where and how names can be
used/usurped, in which order, etc...
--
-
ly share in the
>> sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
>> https://donate.wikimedia.org
>> ___
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
pecies of: fish] [in the: Y family]. It [is found in: Laos,
Vietnam]. It [grows to: 20 cm]. (pictures)
Wikidata Phase 4, perhaps :-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
to answer any questions you might have!
>> >
>> > Yours,
>> > --
>> > James D. Forrester
>> > Product Manager, VisualEditor
>> > Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
>> >
>> > jforres...@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester
>> >
>> >
ke this one:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:FDC_portal/Proposals/2012-2013_round1/Wikimedia_Foundation/Proposal_form
(Please feel free to correct me if I've got this wrong!)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia
a bit like
trying to hide the proverbial elephant...)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
to other knowledge compendiums, or
> even 'the internet'?
>
> Thanks for any pointers!
>
> Lodewijk
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-
Looking forward to seeing some of you there, and please do circulate
this to anyone who might be interested!
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.
ndidates/Questions/1
SJ: definite yes
Kat: defer decision, but worth considering
Ting: ambivalent
So there's a start ;-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: h
ties, but this is
less so in Europe; here it's more "traditional charities")
I've given a quick outline on the meta page. Building up an endowment
sufficient to run WMF would be tricky, of course :-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
_
On 12 March 2013 13:03, Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
> Where are job offers so we can apply?
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.
sification of it. You can plausibly
demonstrate that a contemporary band or ongoing war does not exist without
too much trouble; if you draw a blank on a Renaissance painter, you're more
likely to assume the digital resources are lacking.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org
s is the record, apparently, on enwiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hoaxes_on_Wikipedia
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/lis
Delightfully, it turns out that someone had done exactly this months
ago, and is now running a contest to pick the best:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/02/19/vote-most-exciting-research-about-wikipedia/
Thanks for the other suggestions,
- Andrew.
On 18 February 2013 15:10, Andrew Gray wrote
hich will cover research about/with WP
and other WM projects, and I'm curious to know what people think would
be most interesting as examples. I've a few, but the things I find
interesting are often unusual :-)
Suggestions appreciated!
Thanks,
--
- Andrew Gray
(And perhaps a bonus for "interest in Wikimania" if you make a
> good case)
So, a new challenge: try and predict the food preferences and
prejudices of every member of the Scholarship Committee by Friday. ;-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
_
Interesting news:
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Main_belt_asteroid_No._274301_named_Wikipedia
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
Bear in mind that this year's figures will be skewed by the absolutely
enormous SOPA response - I don't have the final numbers to hand, but I know
that at one point that morning OTRS was fielding an email every minute or
two about it. It's not clear from the report if these are seperated out or
if
e/presse/2013/pressemeldung-yougov-topperformer-brandindex-2012/
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
