Dear all
I hope you had a lovely bank holiday weekend and are enjoying the lovely
weather (at least, it's lovely here in Scotland!)
I wanted to make sure that you have the date of Wikimedia UK’s next AGM in
your diaries, taking place online on Saturday 1st July from 10am to 12
noon. Please book
Hi all
An email was just sent out to all eventbrite sign-ups for tomorrow's AGM
with the Zoom link, and instructions on what to expect for live online
voting. If you did not receive an email and think you should have, please
let me know asap.
You must be signed up to the eventbrite to receive
Hi all
Yesterday we sent out voting packs for the 2021 AGM to all members,
including a link to proxy forms. If you haven't received an email and think
you should have, please let me know.
Best wishes
Katie
--
Katie Crampton (she/her)
Communications & Governance Coordinator
Hi Katie, I can’t see mine. Davina
Sent from my iPhone
> On 7 Jul 2020, at 12:47, Katie Crampton
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all
>
> Yesterday we sent out AGM voting packs by email to all of our members. If you
> didn't receive one and you think you should have, please let me know.
>
> Thanks
>
Hi all
Yesterday we sent out AGM voting packs by email to all of our members. If
you didn't receive one and you think you should have, please let me know.
Thanks
Katie
--
Katie Crampton
Communications & Governance Assistant
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0)203 372 0761
*Wikimedia UK* is the national
Dear all
We had a well attended and successful AGM on Saturday 13th July. Many
thanks to those who attended the event in person and to members of the
charity who submitted a proxy vote.
You can find out more about the day in our blog here
Hi Fae
Your membership expired before we gave the formal notice for the AGM, so
I'm afraid you're not eligible to vote in this AGM as the deadline for
renewal was 1st July. An email was sent to all 'in grace' members as part
of their voting pack for the last AGM on 5th July 2018, including the
Could someone confirm if there is going to be any member voting on
anything this year?
As a member I was expecting there to be some information about proxy
voting, presumably the board does not expect everyone to travel to
Bristol to use their vote. So far, there has been no information sent
out.
Dear all
I just wanted to let you know that there are still places available at our
Annual General Meeting this Saturday 13th July, which is taking place in
the beautiful setting of the Watershed in Bristol. If you would like to
come, please register on our eventbrite page
19:45
> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] AGM
>
> Hi Rex,
>
> Hope you are having a relaxed Sunday. A few in-line responses from one of the
> charity's most radical past trustees over a cup of herbal tea
> :-)
>
> On 16 July 2017 at 19:01,
and other members).
Rod
-Original Message-
From: Wikimediauk-l [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On
Behalf Of Fæ
Sent: 16 July 2017 19:45
To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] AGM
Hi Rex,
Hope you are having a relaxed Sunday. A few in-line responses
On 16/07/17 19:44, Fæ wrote:
> Along with a review to ensure the charity's Articles are
> made fit for the 21st century,
I wonder if the transition to CIO could (should?) also happen?
Gordo
Wikimedia UK is a charity registered in England and Wales, number
1144513 and a company limited
The numbers of email addresses on this list are as follows:
207 Non-digested Members of Wikimediauk-l:
66 Digested Members of Wikimediauk-l:
So this list could have about half of the total membership of the Charity?
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK
Hi Rex,
Hope you are having a relaxed Sunday. A few in-line responses from one
of the charity's most radical past trustees over a cup of herbal tea
:-)
On 16 July 2017 at 19:01, Rex X wrote:
> You make many sensible points, Fae, thank you.
>
> Probably the biggest issue
Hi all,As we are one of these hyper-modern charities which is part of a movement which has literally re-written the fundamentals of information management on a global scale, I do not think it would be immodest of us to explore approaches to digital democracy in keeping with our game-changing
You make many sensible points, Fae, thank you.
Probably the biggest issue for me is whether members are happy with resolutions
being passed with little more than 5% of the membership being present in the
room when the voting took place.
Of course, the other side of that coin is that the business
Thanks Lucy, I'm quite happy to wait until the members can read the
minutes. There's no expectation that replies to questions about
governance have to happen quickly, or need to be answered by the CEO
rather than our unpaid trustees, especially at the weekend.
The question of proxy votes is
Hurrah!
On 16 Jul 2017 12:50, "Lucy Crompton-Reid" <
lucy.crompton-r...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> Nicola (as teller) read out the total number all of the valid votes, which
> were 57 (30 of them proxy votes submitted before the meeting). Cheers, Lucy
>
> On 16 July 2017 at 11:13, Fæ
Nicola (as teller) read out the total number all of the valid votes, which
were 57 (30 of them proxy votes submitted before the meeting). Cheers, Lucy
On 16 July 2017 at 11:13, Fæ wrote:
> A small request for the pending minutes of the AGM; during the meeting
> there was a
A small request for the pending minutes of the AGM; during the meeting
there was a count of hands of voting members, presumably to comply
with the Articles of Association with regard to the legally required
quorum. The final count was not read out, so I will be interested to
read that specific
On 16/07/17 10:34, Katie Chan wrote:
> On 16/07/2017 10:07, Gordon Joly wrote:
>> On 15/07/17 22:39, Katie Chan wrote:
>>> The staff already worked most of a Saturday. People may want to give
>>> them a chance at a (rest of the) weekend?
>>>
>>> Katie
>>
>>
>> Of course. But why send to the
On 16/07/2017 10:07, Gordon Joly wrote:
On 15/07/17 22:39, Katie Chan wrote:
The staff already worked most of a Saturday. People may want to give
them a chance at a (rest of the) weekend?
Katie
Of course. But why send to the mailing list *FIRST*?
I wasn't aware Richard Farmbrough is a
On 15/07/17 22:39, Katie Chan wrote:
> The staff already worked most of a Saturday. People may want to give
> them a chance at a (rest of the) weekend?
>
> Katie
Of course. But why send to the mailing list *FIRST*?
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing
The staff already worked most of a Saturday. People may want to give
them a chance at a (rest of the) weekend?
Katie
On 15/07/2017 21:30, Gordon Joly wrote:
On 15/07/17 16:24, Richard Farmbrough wrote:
All candidates were voted in, and all resolutions passed, nearly
unanimously.
I hope
On 15/07/17 16:24, Richard Farmbrough wrote:
> All candidates were voted in, and all resolutions passed, nearly
> unanimously.
>
I hope the membership are emailed as well, since members might not be on
this discussion list?
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK
All candidates were voted in, and all resolutions passed, nearly
unanimously.
On 15 Jul 2017 16:17, "Richard Farmbrough" wrote:
If Harry joins it will be 499.
On 15 Jul 2017 14:53, "Michael Peel" wrote:
> That's an excellent turn-around to see.
Dear all
Many thanks to those of you who attended Saturday's meetup and AGM, and
also to everyone who voted by proxy. I thought it was a great day and the
feedback (from forms completed on the day) seems to be very positive.
Thanks again to Andy Mabbett and others for your involvement in the day,
Dear all
If you are coming to tomorrow's Wikimedia UK Meetup and AGM, please
remember to bring your voting forms, and your camera for Wiki Takes
Birmingham :)
I hope to see many of you there. Tea and coffee will be available at Impact
Hub from 10.30am, and we'll be starting at 11am. The AGM
On 17 June 2016 at 20:30, Lucy Crompton-Reid
wrote:
> As previously confirmed on this mailing list, the next AGM for Wikimedia UK
> will be held at 3pm on Saturday 9th July at Impact Hub Birmingham, Walker
> Building, 58 Oxford St, Birmingham B5 5NY. We have
Hi Deryck,
The schedule is available at https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/2016_AGM
It goes as follows:
- 10.30am Arrive, tea and coffee
- 11.00am Welcome and overview of the day from Lucy Crompton-Reid
- 11.10am The Open Movement - Keynote talk by Andy Mabbett
- 11.45am Morning
Hello WMUK people,
What's the rundown of the AGM? I think I've seen one somewhere but can't
find it anymore... I'll be travelling by public transport so it'll be
useful to be able to plan ahead for the arrival time in Birmingham and
departure time from Birmingham.
Deryck
Dear all
The formal notice of the 2016 AGM for Wikimedia UK was sent to members by
email yesterday on behalf of the board of trustees. If you are a member and
haven't received the email, please do check your spam box and/or ask us for
a copy of the email.
As previously confirmed on this
Dear all
I'm pleased to confirm that this year's Wikimedia UK AGM and WMUK Meet Up
will be on *Saturday 9th July* at Impact Hub in Birmingham. We will be
finalising the schedule over the next few weeks but are planning to start
at 10.30am, with half an hour for tea, coffee and networking before
Dear all
Well it's a close run thing but it looks like Birmingham is a slightly more
popular choice for the AGM on Saturday 9th July. We now need to find a
venue, which I'll confirm asap along with timings for the day.
Andy Mabbett has very kindly offered to be involved in planning and shaping
Until last year the venue had always alternated between London and
not-London. It seems to me, therefore, that not-London is a priority for
this year.
On 18 March 2016 at 11:53, Lucy Crompton-Reid <
lucy.crompton-r...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have previously emailed regarding
On 18/03/16 16:28, James Farrar wrote:
> Until last year the venue had always alternated between London and
> not-London. It seems to me, therefore, that not-London is a priority for
> this year.
What is the Universe of Discourse here?
Gordo
___
On 18 March 2016 at 11:53, Lucy Crompton-Reid
wrote:
> Also, please do let me know if you'd be interested in helping to shape the
> day as a volunteer!
I'd be happy to. As I live in Birmingham, I can also help you find a
venue, if you decide to come here.
But there is a precedent for moving the London meetup to the first weekend in
July:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetup/London/35
--
Rexx
> On 19 March 2016 at 09:04 WereSpielChequers
> wrote:
>
>
> I agree with the logic of rotating between London and
Dear all
I have previously emailed regarding this year's AGM for Wikimedia UK, which
will be taking place on Saturday 9th July. This is the point where new
board members can stand for election and where members of the charity have
the opportunity to express their views, raise ideas or discuss
I agree with the logic of rotating between London and elsewhere. However,
if you hold the AGM on the same weekend as the London meetup it would be
sensible to hold it in the same city.
On 18 March 2016 at 16:28, James Farrar wrote:
> Until last year the venue had always
It may take a little while to get the minutes typed up and released, but a
quick summary on the motions is that all passed apart from the last one on the
agenda which was defeated.
Michael
——
Michael Maggs
Chair
Wikimedia UK
On 10 Aug 2014, at 03:21, Craig Franklin
On 10/08/14 07:42, Michael Maggs wrote:
It may take a little while to get the minutes typed up and released,
but a quick summary on the motions is that all passed apart from the
last one on the agenda which was defeated.
Michael
——
Yes, and that had to be clarified as I recall. The
Not since I rejoined WMUK in February 2014. There seems to be some
confusion about my requests for communication (or not to receive
communication) and also my data held an WMUK.
I am now aware of what happened. Case closed!
Gordo
On 07/08/14 14:58, Dhaval S. Vyas wrote:
Do you mean you also
Hi Lodewijk,
I think you're not the only one, I haven't received any of the four
either.
Dhaval
On 7 Aug 2014 00:11, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Might it be that for some reason I did not receive those? I do remember
seeing email a while ago (checked: 27 June), when things
Have you checked your spam folders?
Its not a bad idea for everyone to add @wikimedia.org.uk to your whitelist
to make sure these emails go to your inbox.
On 7 Aug 2014 08:13, Dhaval S. Vyas dsv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lodewijk,
I think you're not the only one, I haven't received any of the
And of course everything is on the wiki
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/2014_Annual_General_Meeting
On 7 August 2014 08:24, Chris McKenna chris.mcke...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
Have you checked your spam folders?
Its not a bad idea for everyone to add @wikimedia.org.uk to your
whitelist to
Most of what was sent out by post isn't on the wiki...
Thanks,
Mike
On 7 Aug 2014, at 08:27, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
And of course everything is on the wiki
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/2014_Annual_General_Meeting
On 7 August 2014 08:24, Chris McKenna
Was referring to the final agenda and prepared motions Lodewijk asked about.
As Richard S says - email him and he can send again.
On 7 August 2014 09:44, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Most of what was sent out by post isn't on the wiki...
Thanks,
Mike
On 7 Aug 2014, at 08:27,
Just out of interest, was anything crucial sent out via post? I know WMDE
sends out the voting ballots that way, so making sure I'm not amiss :)
Thanks for resending! Btw, I searched for emails from
members...@wikimedia.org.uk - didn't receive emails from tellers@ since
last year.
Best,
Lodewijk
Yes - ballot papers with a unique id code, to guard against fraud. This was
raised as a potential concern by members in the last year. I have to work
out how those who haven't recieved it can vote. Will take some time :-)
On 7 Aug 2014 10:10, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Just out
Confusion solved, it seems WMUK lapsed my membership without notification.
So I didn't receive notices as I'm apparently no longer a member.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-08-07 10:13 GMT+01:00 Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
:
Yes - ballot papers with a unique id code, to guard against
On 7 August 2014 11:57, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Confusion solved, it seems WMUK lapsed my membership without notification.
So I didn't receive notices as I'm apparently no longer a member.
That's exactly what happened to me. I would have renewed my WMUK
membership if I had
The old system of an alert at the bottom of the monthly newsletter was *not
fit for purpose.*
We will now have a much better system with our new database that w will
send proper direct email reminders.
Jon.
On 7 August 2014 12:07, Andrew West andrewcw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 August 2014
On 07/08/14 00:02, Richard Symonds wrote:
I've sent four emails and a pack in the post...
Did you send one to me? In the post? I have not received it!
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
2014 Annual General Meeting of Wikimedia UK, to be held in Frobisher
Rooms 123 on the 4th floor of The Barbican Centre, London, on Saturday 9
August at 4pm.
Aha! I will be there
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
On 07/08/14 08:24, Chris McKenna wrote:
Have you checked your spam folders?
As long as it came from an address in use in the past it is OK. If you
start using a new address, such as agm2104@blah. then yes, it might
get stuck.
What is the From: field?
Gordo
On 07/08/14 12:10, Jon Davies wrote:
The old system of an alert at the bottom of the monthly newsletter was
*not fit for purpose.*
We will now have a much better system with our new database that w will
send proper direct email reminders.
Jon.
I believe that the membership of any
I must say that it is odd that if there is realization that a whole bunch
of memberships is about to lapse, nobody sends (even manually) a bunch of
reminders out...
2014-08-07 12:10 GMT+01:00 Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk:
The old system of an alert at the bottom of the monthly
+1
On 7 Aug 2014 12:27, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
I must say that it is odd that if there is realization that a whole bunch
of memberships is about to lapse, nobody sends (even manually) a bunch of
reminders out...
2014-08-07 12:10 GMT+01:00 Jon Davies
Please note that the board of trustees had the option to rectify this
rather easily, even last minute, as they have the right to waive membership
fees for individual members: https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Membership/Rules
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-08-07 12:26 GMT+01:00 Gordon Joly
On 07/08/14 12:32, Lodewijk wrote:
Please note that the board of trustees had the option to rectify this
rather easily, even last minute, as they have the right to waive
membership fees for individual members
It has been standard practice in the past to accept new and returning
members at the
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at
the bottom of every newsletter sent out by WMUK in the past 12 months at
least.
For example the last one I have saved said: Date of end of membership
term: 2015-10-02 | Your Membership Status: Current (I will check that as I
But the old system we were using on civi worked fine for sending out reminders
when membership went into grace?
Thanks,
Mike
On 7 Aug 2014, at 12:51, Chris McKenna chris.mcke...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at the
bottom of
We're discussing solutions at the moment all. Will keep you all up to date.
On 7 Aug 2014 12:51, Chris McKenna chris.mcke...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at
the bottom of every newsletter sent out by WMUK in the past 12 months at
...In a filing cabinet on a disused toilet in the basement, behind a sign
saying beware of the leopard
On Aug 7, 2014 12:51 PM, Chris McKenna chris.mcke...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at
the bottom of every newsletter sent out by
On 07/08/14 14:05, Andy Mabbett wrote:
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at
the bottom of every newsletter sent out by WMUK in the past 12 months at
least.
For example the last one I have saved said: Date of end of membership
term: 2015-10-02 | Your
Do you mean you also have not received any recently?
On 7 Aug 2014 14:38, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 07/08/14 14:05, Andy Mabbett wrote:
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at
the bottom of every newsletter sent out by WMUK in the past 12
I suspect taking renewals and back dues at the door will be well worth while ...
- d.
On 07/08/2014, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 07/08/14 14:05, Andy Mabbett wrote:
A notice about your membership status has been automatically included at
the bottom of every newsletter sent
Hi,
I was doubting if it would be worth to miss other sessions (one of which
facilitated by me) to join the WMUK agm this weekend, but I couldn't find
an email announcing the final agenda with prepared motions etc. I was
curious, is such an announcement towards the membership forthcoming, or did
Hi Lodewijk,
I've sent four emails and a pack in the post...
On 7 Aug 2014 00:00, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi,
I was doubting if it would be worth to miss other sessions (one of which
facilitated by me) to join the WMUK agm this weekend, but I couldn't find
an email
Might it be that for some reason I did not receive those? I do remember
seeing email a while ago (checked: 27 June), when things were preliminary
etc, but don't recall anything recent with the final agenda etc? And
definitely not four. And don't recall a post package either (but living
outside the
Ill check tomorrow and send it out again from tell...@wikimedia.org.uk. All
members across the world should have it by now... certainly it reached
Australia and Japan!
Let's talk tomorrow.
On 7 Aug 2014 00:11, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Might it be that for some reason I did
All,
As you might know, me and a volunteer were tellers at the last AGM, and the
EGM before that. The next AGM is approaching... so I've asked a few
questions about hustings at the AGM at
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:WikiConference_UK_2013#Hustings. Mostly
it's about length of speeches,
Our Annual General Meeting is just around the corner and we'll be
holding the annual election of the board of directors. As with
previous years, we'd like to appoint two independent tellers who will
be responsible for running the election, counting votes and announcing
the results. We plan a
On 26 Sep 2009, at 12:52, Al Tally wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM, brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org wrote:
From: Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com
- Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
also, where is it going to be? That's the biggest factor for me.
I
2009/9/26 brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org:
From: Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com
- Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
also, where is it going to be? That's the biggest factor for me.
I think the idea was London - Seddon could you confirm?
Just a semi-idle question.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM, brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org wrote:
From: Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com
- Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
also, where is it going to be? That's the biggest factor for me.
I think the idea was London - Seddon could you
From: Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net
On 26 Sep 2009, at 12:52, Al Tally wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM, brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org wrote:
From: Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com
- Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
also, where is it going to
- Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
also, where is it going to be? That's the biggest factor for me.
I think the idea was London - Seddon could you confirm?
Andrew
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
2009/9/11 joseph seddon life_is_bitter_sw...@hotmail.co.uk:
To help with the selection of dates for the AGM and OKCON, a doodle poll has
been set up with
dates over the two weekends after easter (to avoid clashing with the easter
holiday weekend).
Please choose the dates for you which think
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/11 joseph seddon life_is_bitter_sw...@hotmail.co.uk:
To help with the selection of dates for the AGM and OKCON, a doodle poll
has
been set up with
dates over the two weekends after easter (to avoid clashing
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/11 joseph seddon life_is_bitter_sw...@hotmail.co.uk:
To help with the selection of dates for the AGM and OKCON, a doodle poll
has
Hi all,
After a bit of prodding from various wikipedians I think I've got the
licence right on this set of pics taken at the the AGM 26 April:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bowbrick/sets/72157617359600152/
Unrelated question: on Twitter, Chris Vallance, a producer on iPM,
wonders:
Wikipedia
From: Steve Bowbrick steve.bowbr...@bbc.co.uk
Unrelated question: on Twitter, Chris Vallance, a producer on iPM,
wonders:
Wikipedia received most UK traffic from searches for Swine Flu -
Should Directgov, NHS, collaborate with the site?
And links to these numbers from traffic stats
Has anyone got any pictures of the AGM? If so, could you upload them
to the wiki at uk.wikimedia.org.
It would be good to have some pics so we can start to illustrate the
site.
Cheers!
Andrew
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
2009/3/10 Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
Errr I thought notice of an AGM was a legal... notice?
Well, presumably only as soon as it is finalized and approved by the board.
Indeed. The one of the site is a
At 13:19 + 7/3/09, Andrew Turvey wrote:
Hi all,
Unfortunately we've drawn a blank with finding a suitable free venue
in Birmingham, so we've decided to move to plan B, which is
Manchester.
Does anyone have any contacts - for instance at the University -
which would enable them to book a
On Mar 9, 8:15 am, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
At 13:19 + 7/3/09, Andrew Turvey wrote:
Hi all,
Unfortunately we've drawn a blank with finding a suitable free venue
in Birmingham, so we've decided to move to plan B, which is
Manchester.
Does anyone have any contacts -
The Board was very clear to me - only free or nearly free (i.e. £10)
would do!
If we're not able to get a free room, I guess we can start looking at
non-free ones.
On Mar 8, 12:38 am, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/7 Andrew Turvey ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Hi all,
Personally, I think a meeting in a pub or even a pub room gives a very
different impression to a meeting in a university room, and we need to
bear that in mind. Imagine giving a presentation or holding hustings.
Although we're only small now, I hope this is the start of something
big. I say let's
2009/3/8 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Personally, I think a meeting in a pub or even a pub room gives a very
different impression to a meeting in a university room, and we need to
bear that in mind. Imagine giving a presentation or holding hustings.
*Function room* of a pub - they are
At 16:22 + 8/3/09, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/3/8 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Personally, I think a meeting in a pub or even a pub room gives a very
different impression to a meeting in a university room, and we need to
bear that in mind. Imagine giving a presentation or holding
Hi all,
Unfortunately we've drawn a blank with finding a suitable free venue in
Birmingham, so we've decided to move to plan B, which is Manchester.
Does anyone have any contacts - for instance at the University - which would
enable them to book a room for free on Saturday 25th or Sunday 26th
Speaking personally, this is a major PITA. I may not be able to fund
train tickets to Manchester, so I suppose I'll be on the coach.
Joy!
2009/3/7 Andrew Turvey ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Hi all,
Unfortunately we've drawn a blank with finding a suitable free venue in
Birmingham, so we've decided
2009/3/7 Andrew Turvey ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
Hi all,
Unfortunately we've drawn a blank with finding a suitable free venue in
Birmingham, so we've decided to move to plan B, which is Manchester.
Have you looked at non-free venues? A function room in a pub probably
wouldn't cost all that much,
2009/3/8 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
Have you looked at non-free venues? A function room in a pub probably
wouldn't cost all that much, we don't need much more than that. B'ham
is better located than Manchester.
Function rooms in pubs are frequently free if you ask nicely.
-
From: Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
Sent: 04 March 2009 00:23
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] AGM Resolutions
2009/3/4 Tom Holden thomas.hol...@gmail.com:
In any case, we almost certainly want to be a charitable incorporated
organisation
At 16:09 -0800 2/3/09, AndrewRT wrote:
We're hoping to make the business side of the AGM as quick as
possible, but does anyone have any resolutions they would like to be
put to the meeting?
At the moment the resolutions are:
1. Setting the maximum number of Directors to seven
2. Appointing those
2009/3/3 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
The Board has an action to register with the Charity Commission as
soon as it's likely that our income will be more than £5,000 - which
will be as soon were announced as the winning bid for Wikimania 2010 (-
grin-), or, failing that, when our donations
2009/3/3 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
The Board has an action to register with the Charity Commission as
soon as it's likely that our income will be more than £5,000 - which
will be as soon were announced as the winning bid for Wikimania 2010 (-
grin-), or, failing that, when our donations
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo