Platonides schreef:
(it's helpfully provided in the API result . . . actually, what
does it mean that Portal and Portal talk are canonical? shouldn't
there be no canonical attribute if the namespace is custom?).
Agree. Portal and Portal talk could still be acceptable, since the
namespace
Le 19.3.2009 4:46, « lee worden » won...@riseup.net a écrit :
Attached is a patch for the skins directory that allows changing the
Content-type dynamically. After applying this patch, if any code sets the
global $wgServeAsXHTML to true, the page will be output with the xhtml+xml
content
2009/3/18 lee worden won...@riseup.net:
Attached is a patch for the skins directory that allows changing the
Content-type dynamically. After applying this patch, if any code sets the
global $wgServeAsXHTML to true, the page will be output with the xhtml+xml
content type. This seems to work
On Mar 18, 2009, at 20:00, Andrew Garrett and...@epstone.net wrote:
To help a bit more with performance, I've also added a profiler within
the interface itself. Hopefully this will encourage self-policing with
regard to filter performance.
Awesome!
Maybe we could use that for templates too
What's to patch? This is already a configuration variable, just set
it...
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
On Mar 18, 2009, at 21:24, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
2009/3/19 lee worden won...@riseup.net:
I'm at work on a MW extension that, among other things, uses
On 3/19/09 5:15 AM, Tei wrote:
since theres already a database, this sounds like could be done flagging
edits as vandalism, and then reading the existing database information to
extract these details, like ip, a diff of the change, etc.. that way,
humans define what is a vandalism, and the
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Andrew Garrett and...@epstone.net wrote:
snip
To help a bit more with performance, I've also added a profiler within
the interface itself. Hopefully this will encourage self-policing with
regard to filter performance.
Based on personal observations, the
Cobi (owner of ClueBot) and his roomate Crispy have already been
working hard to make this specific dataset, but they've been hurt by
not enough contributors. The page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/User:Crispy1989#New_Dataset_Contribution_Interface
X!
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:15 AM
This has been done before, for instance in the ASCIIMath4Wiki extension [2].
I don't want to change the Content-type unconditionally, though, only some
of the time, so that we can serve texvc-style images to browsers or users
that don't like the modified content type.
Note that this will
I presented a talk at Wikimania 2007 that espoused the virtues of
combining human measures of content with automatically determined
measures in order to generalize to unseen instances. Unfortunately all
those Wikimania talks seem to have been lost. It was related to this
article on predicting the
Brian wrote:
Delerium, you do make it sound as if merely having the tagged dataset
solves the entire problem. But there are really multiple problems. One
is learning to classify what you have been told is in the dataset
(e.g., that all instances of this rule in the edit history *really
are*
Brian wrote:
I just wanted to be really clear about what I mean as a specific
counter-example to this just being an example of reconstructing that
rule set. Suppose you use the AbuseFilter rules on the entire history
of the wiki in order to generate a dataset of positive and negative
examples
Ultimately we need a system that integrates information from multiple
sources, such as WikiTrust, AbuseFilter and the Wikipedia Editorial
Team.
A general point - there is a *lot* of information contained in edits
that AbuseFilter cannot practically characterize due to the complexity
of language
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
A general point - there is a *lot* of information contained in edits
that AbuseFilter cannot practically characterize due to the complexity
of language and the subtelty of certain types of abuse. A system with
access to
2009/3/19 Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
A general point - there is a *lot* of information contained in edits
that AbuseFilter cannot practically characterize due to the complexity
of language and the
Andrew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
PS: Why there isn't a link to Special:AbuseFilter/history/$id on the
filter view?
There is.
Oops. I was looking for it on the top bar, not at the bottom. I stay
corrected.
16 matches
Mail list logo
