Reply to message 7
Seems it can use anywhere but it not support Chinese at least. It do not
support
the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_input_methods_for_computers . May it
be
fix?
HW
寄件人﹕ wikitech-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
Hey all,
I've been working on the InlineEditor extension again, primarily working on a
new interface that doesn't use the different edit modes anymore, as the
usability testing showed that this was not the right approach. Luckily, without
a change in the underlying algorithms, it was doable to
Hi everyone,
Here's a breakdown of the revisions left to review:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_roadmap/1.17/Revision_report
Current count of branches plus extensions: 283
There's a script to generate this (publishing source later; requires
toolserver), so we should be able to maintain
* Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com [Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:38:53
+]:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
Krinkle wrote:
So PHP would extract {{#author:4}} and {{#license:12}} from the
textblob when showing the editpage.
And show the
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
When I load their homepage, the formulas don't appear for about two
seconds of 100% CPU usage, on Firefox 4b9. And that's for two small
formulas.
Works OK in Safari. WebKit perhaps?
I'm not impressed. IMO,
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
When I load their homepage, the formulas don't appear for about two
seconds of 100% CPU usage, on Firefox 4b9. And that's for two small
formulas. I'm not impressed. IMO, the correct way forward is to work
on native MathML support -- Gecko and WebKit both support it these
Jan Paul Posma jp.posma at gmail.com writes:
Hey all,
I've been working on the InlineEditor extension again, primarily working on a
new interface that doesn't
use the different edit modes anymore, as the usability testing showed that
this was not the right
approach. Luckily, without a
Jan Paul Posma wrote:
Hey all,
I've been working on the InlineEditor extension again, primarily working on a
new interface that doesn't use the different edit modes anymore, as the
usability testing showed that this was not the right approach. Luckily,
without a change in the underlying
Jan,
Very cool. Took me a minute to figure out how to use it, but once I did I
really liked it. I think the user should have some way to correct any
incorrectly parsed sentences though. Doing this would help develop a better
sentence boundary parser in the long run too.
Nice work.
--
Jeff
On
Hello,
I have made a mistake Saturday evening (around 18:30 UTC) which broke
some SUL-related functions. The issue was fixed by Apergos about 1 hour
later while I was out of home.
Here is the report:
I tried to create the Esperanto wikisource (bug 26136 [1]) by following
our guide on
Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
Hello,
I have made a mistake Saturday evening (around 18:30 UTC) which broke
some SUL-related functions. The issue was fixed by Apergos about 1 hour
later while I was out of home.
Don't worry more about it, Ashar.
I think the need for --wiki aawiki is fixed in
On 1/22/11 5:40 PM, Maciej Jaros wrote:
Just remember that people all over the world are hacking into Mediawiki
all the time. Making it harder won't help a bit.
I think minification is orthogonal to the hacking question.
I've said it before here but the key to enabling hackers is to have a
jida...@jidanni.org wrote in message news:87mxmwfie4.fsf...@jidanni.org...
C On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Happy-melon happy-me...@live.com
wrote:
Isn't that what release notes are for?
Say, how do you pros see what changed?
Here is my extra stupid way. I do it every few weeks.
cp
Rob Lanphier robla at wikimedia.org writes:
Current count of branches plus extensions: 283
Hi Rob,
I quickly checked the count and it matches with the actuals.
Thanks
Janesh
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 01/22/2011 08:15 PM, Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
Having a clear separate input text field Author: is much more
user friendly {{#fileauthor:}}, which is so to say, a type of obscure
MediaWiki jargon.
I disagree. In real life, there are always more compliated
cases, where an author is not an
* Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se [Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:06:02 +0100]:
On 01/22/2011 08:15 PM, Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
Having a clear separate input text field Author: is much more
user friendly {{#fileauthor:}}, which is so to say, a type of
obscure
MediaWiki jargon.
I disagree. In
16 matches
Mail list logo