On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Moriel Schottlender
wrote:
> An I missing something?
When an employee of the WMF starts a new topic on the mailing list with the
words "we are" and "binding", it comes off with the wrong connotation,
especially considering the "we" was clarified to mean the "Wiki
Isn't this the point of this email chain and talk page, though? To open
this up to the broader community for development...?
The idea was picked up and developed in wikimania and is now being proposed
as a starting point for development by the tech community on a broader
scale. Seems to allow for
Help will be appreciated @
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T108437
Em 07/08/2015 5:05 PM, "S Page" escreveu:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:24:03 +0200, Krinkle wrote:
>
> TL:DR; Double-check your wiki's site scripts and your personal scripts
> > to ensure "document.write" is no longer used.
> >
> .
Yeah, I'm with Brian. I consider myself a member of the Wikimedia
technical community and I did not yet get an opportunity to participate in
the process of developing this document (which appears to have been mostly
offline at Wikimania).
--
Bartosz Dziewoński
_
On 8/7/15, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 11:43 AM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>> Thank you for drafting this up, Matt. Who's "we" here?
>
> In that case, "we" meant the Wikimedia technical community (in
> collaboration with other related groups at WMF). Several people have
> already participat
Hi!
So I'm just going through the latest Wikimedia Foundation quarterly
report, and I stumbled on a short passage that mentions a feature of
the mobile Wikipedia app that I really, really enjoy using.
The ability to view a link preview when clicking on an article link
inside the app is just fantas
