ategory could still always visit it, it's just that other users
would not be directed to it unless they probe talk page debates.
Luke Welling
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:38 PM, James Forrester
wrote:
> [I worry we're talking about operational details, which should be a wider
&g
eople's changes that I've previously reviewed. It takes a lot of time to
properly review a big change, and I don't know an easy way to say "Show me
all my comments on previous patch sets so I can see if they have been
addressed".
Luke Welling
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:10 AM,
x27;t slow the rest of your processing.
Luke Welling
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:34 PM, dan entous wrote:
> context
> ---
> i’m working on a mediawiki extension,
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GWToolset, which has as one of
> its goals, the ability to upload media
Luke
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 11:45 AM, Luke Welling WMF wrote:
> > On the email title sidetrack, it should not create a 4th way.
>
> The pedant in me says there are at least two more ways -- different
> capitalization for &qu
peak RFC2822 and not
RFC2047(?) you can still transmit them correctly.
Luke Welling
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 10:43 AM, Jasper Wallace wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, MZMcBride wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> P.S. mailman: ther
If you want to play cat and mouse, a good reference for things that work is
http://samy.pl/evercookie/
It's mostly targeted at a single domain stopping users from deleting
cookies, but some of the same things should break cross domain security
too.
I'm not sure that end of web ethics is where we
It would be a good application for mobile too.
In browser would be reasonably easy with Flash, and can be done with
JavaScript in modern browsers but not yet in a consistent way. There is a
W3 spec but using a library like
https://github.com/jussi-kalliokoski/sink.js/ would be easier than writing
The advice on
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Query_profiling_for_features_developers
sounds
good.
Is there more detail somewhere on how to do this part "Test your query
against production slaves prior to full deployment"?
Luke
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> On 0
We should discuss them separately, but this core mediawiki JS is GPL2
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-core/tree/master/resources
This JS which was mentioned in the forwarded email that started this
discussion is available via a wiki page so is probably under a CC-BY-SA-3.0
as it is submitte
Yes. There seems little value in unqualified people debating if it is
legally required.
The mainstream FOSS licences all predate minification and seem to have been
written with compiled languages in mind, not interpreted languages. Most
have language that requires the licence in the source versi
JavaScript is a separate issue, and
possibly much more complicated. CC-BY-SA-3.0 is not an ideal licence for
software, and it seems likely that there will be code pasted into some
user JavaScript pages that is licensed under an incompatible licence.
Luke Welling
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:57 AM,
: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions/Database
Luke Welling
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
>
>
> 26 Февраль 2013 г. 14:27:06 пользователь Nikola Smolenski (
>> smole...@eunet.rs) написал:
>>
>>
>> On 26/02/13 04:18,
only use that machinery every few days.
We have some of that, but heading further down that road would be a good
thing even if we chose to keep organized periodic deployments.
Luke Welling
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Juliusz Gonera wrote:
> Sorry for digging up an old thread, but toda
Do you want help?
I don't know much about the API at the moment, but it is my Level-Up
assignment this quarter. Documenting things is a good way to learn them.
I have written a lot of courseware in the past.
Luke Welling
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
> I will
I don't know if we are talking at cross purposes, or if I missed it, but
this paper:
http://elie.im/publication/text-based-captcha-strengths-and-weaknesses
does not try to answer my question.
What I want to know is "*How many humans get turned away from editing
Wikipedia by a difficult captcha?*"
That was not the end of the problem I was referring to. We know our
specific captcha is broken at turning away machines. As far as I am aware
we do not know how many humans are being turned away by the difficulty of
it. It's a safe bet that it is non-zero given the manual account requests
we get,
Even ignoring openness and privacy, exactly the same problems are present
with reCAPTCHA as with Fancy Captcha. It's often very hard or impossible
for humans to read, and is a big enough target to have been broken by
various people.
I don't know if it's constructive to brainstorm solutions to a "
useful but time consuming
thing to provide. Patrolling for typos is not.
Put it this way, if I concede and agree that the bikeshed can be green, the
people who spent three hours arguing for green should feel obligated to
turn up to the working bee to help with the painting.
Luke Welling
On Wed,
Is this bug the same issue? It looks like somebody put up a partial fix
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38432
- Luke Welling
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Aran Dunkley wrote:
> The file was a .doc, but I've tried changing it to docx and get the same
> result. Some
;state of TechnologyX" is tough to
get accepted unless you are Rasmus, Larry or Guido. "How we did
at with " is a
much better bet. OSCON always runs some talks along the lines of "saving
the world with open culture", so a charismatic speaker with a non-obvious
spin on that is
And PS, as I've been dinged for this a few times this is now in my .vimrc
to highlight trailing whitespace in vim.
highlight ExtraWhitespace ctermbg=red guibg=red
match ExtraWhitespace /\s\+$/
autocmd BufWInEnter * match ExtraWhitespace /\s\+$/
autocmd InsertEnter * match ExtraWhitespace /\s\+\%#\
It should be an ignorable warning.
There are occasionally situations where trailing white space is necessary.
MySQL for instance can be funny about combining multi line strings into one
query, although I don't think it presents when called via PHP.
Luke
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Chad wr
s of iOS devlces.
>
It's about providing knowledge to the rapidly growing userbase of mobile
device owners who fall outside the tiny segment that is Android users who
have deliberately chosen to replace the stock Android browser with Firefox.
Luke Welling
__
ot an ideologically pure answer that is compatible with the goal
of taking video content and disseminating it effectively and globally. The
conversation needs to be framed as what shade of grey is an acceptable
compromise.
Luke Welling
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Le 12/
MS SQL version requires the programmer to manually
call encodeBlob() before building their query if they know they are
inserting binary data.
Luke Welling
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I recently found that it is less than clear how numbers should be
> q
tatic
content change, but there would not be much effort in adding that to a
deploy process and there must be developer overhead being incurred in
trying to keep new code backwards compatible.
Luke Welling
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Code was updated to use while the
ere is one.
Thanks,
Luke Welling
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
r IE) into unambiguous, fair,
numeric cutoffs may be hard. Predicting future IE market share depends
a great deal on the vagaries of auto update policies and corporate IT
departments. For instance Windows XP users are stuck on IE8 forever
and there are probably quite a lot of them in corporate America.
Lu
good thing.
Luke Welling
PS my unobtainable cool domain hack of choice would be en.cy (but
Cyprus don't do top level subdomains and require local presence)
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
> On 19/11/12 02:09, MZMcBride wrote:
>>
>> Tim Starling wrote:
29 matches
Mail list logo