On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Subramanya Sastry wrote:
> And, both Roan and Scott are correct. Pathway 2. would be a test of of
> external libraries (HTML5 and Domino, not just domino). And, we did have
> bugs in the HTML5 parsing library we used (which I fixed based on reports
> from Roan) a
On 07/25/2013 01:03 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, C. Scott Ananian
wrote:
For what it's worth, both the DOM serialization-to-a-string and DOM
parsing-from-a-string are done with the domino package. It has a
substantial test suite of its own (originally from
http://ww
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, C. Scott Ananian
wrote:
> For what it's worth, both the DOM serialization-to-a-string and DOM
> parsing-from-a-string are done with the domino package. It has a
> substantial test suite of its own (originally from
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Testing I believe
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 09:58 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>
>> There are a few things I wish it tested, but they're mostly about how it
>> tests things rather than what data is collected. For instance, it would be
>> nice if the round-trip tests could
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> > Or just drop by #wikimedia-parsoid, I'm marcoil there.
> >
> The channel is #mediawiki-parsoid :)
Yes, sorry… I hadn't had enough coffee :)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.
On 07/24/2013 09:58 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
There are a few things I wish it tested, but they're mostly about how
it tests things rather than what data is collected. For instance, it
would be nice if the round-trip tests could round-trip from wikitext
to HTML *string* and back, rather than to H
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Marc Ordinas i Llopis
wrote:
> As Subbu said, I'm currently working on improving the round-trip test
> server, mostly on porting it from sqlite to MySQL but also on expanding the
> stats kept (with things like performance, etc.). If you think of some other
> data w
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:55 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> Could you provide a dump of the list of 24000 bustable pages? Split
> by project? Each community could then investigate those pages for
> broken tables, and more critically .. templates which emit broken
> wikisyntax that is causing your
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:55 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
> wrote:
> > http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
> >
> > This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
> > wikipedias).
>
> Very minor point .. there are ~40
On 07/23/2013 06:55 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
wikipedias).
Very minor point .. there are ~400 missing pages on the list; i
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
> http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
>
> This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
> wikipedias).
Very minor point .. there are ~400 missing pages on the list; is that
intentional ? ;-)
One is 'Mos:time'
On 07/23/2013 06:02 PM, Subramanya Sastry wrote:
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
VE and Parsoid devs have put in a lot and lot of effort to recognize
broken
wikitext source, fix it or isolate it,
My point was that you dont appear to be doing analysis of how of all
Wikipedia con
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:24 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
>> Was a regression testsuite built using the issues encountered during
>> the last parser rewrite?
>>
>
> Yes, mediawiki/core/tests/parser/parserTests.txt (which predates parsoid)
> has been continuously updated throughout the development
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:13 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> > http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
> >
> > This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
> > wikipedias).
>
> Fantastic! How frequently are those tests re-run? Could you add a
> last-run-date on that page
On 07/23/2013 06:13 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi John and Risker,
>>>
>>> First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the
>>> previous
>>> po
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the previous
post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more that we've
fixed sufficient b
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
> wrote:
> > Hi John and Risker,
> >
> > First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the
> previous
> > post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
wrote:
> Hi John and Risker,
>
> First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the previous
> post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more that we've
> fixed sufficient bugs at this point that the most significa
19 matches
Mail list logo
