James Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Paul Vriens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
W2K doesn't fail with ERROR_INVALID_NAME but with ERROR_GENERAL_SYNTAX
(setupapi
error).
That error was added for a reason; it was seen on a win2k box. Please
don't remove it.
Ok, don't
patching file dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 448.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c.rej
Dan what does this mean on a patch I submitted tonight
How do I fix it?
Chris
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 10:44:09 pm Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
For example applications don't expect to see pointers into the upper
1-2 GB of the 4 GB virtual memory address space because on Windows the
kernel's memory is mapped there. But, ld-linux.so.2 could load
libraries there,
Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patching file dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 448.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c.rej
Dan what does this mean on a patch I submitted tonight
That means that the source you have used to
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patching file dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 448.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c.rej
Dan what does this mean on a patch I submitted tonight
That means that the
James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Changelog:
* Fix a failing test in win9x.
dlls/crypt32/tests/ctl.c | 15 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
The !ret in:
+else
+{
+
On Mi, 2008-09-10 at 18:16 +0200, Tony wrote:
Hi,
At least for all Windows versions below Vista, the d3dx9 importlib does
exist (and d3dx9_36 does not),
I installed a recent dx9-runtime on my w2k test system, but a d3dx9.dll
is not
present (d3dx9_36.dll exist).
I get always a
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The !ret in:
+else
+{
+ok(!ret GetLastError() == CRYPT_E_EXISTS,
+ expected CRYPT_E_EXISTS, got %d %08x\n, ret, GetLastError());
+}
is superfluous.
It is, but I'm sticking with
James Hawkins wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The !ret in:
+else
+{
+ok(!ret GetLastError() == CRYPT_E_EXISTS,
+ expected CRYPT_E_EXISTS, got %d %08x\n, ret, GetLastError());
+}
is superfluous.
It is, but I'm
Huw Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ IMPORTS = uuid ole32 ws2_32 user32 advapi32 kernel32
C_SRCS = \
inetcomm_main.c \
+ internat.c \
internettransport.c \
mimeole.c \
regsvr.c
I find that abbreviating 'international' as 'internat' is a
Hi,
I forwarded your concerns to the xorg list and got the following response from
Daniel Stone:
Stopping the pointer from moving is easily done by temporarily detaching
the device. Getting unclipped relative events will also be catered for.
Roderick
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
Hi all,
Am 10.09.2008 um 17:32 schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
You can attach any debugger to a Win32 process running in Wine. This
includes Linux debuggers like gdb, [...]
As I didn't find hints on how to do this I tried myself:
** First, start gdb in the C: directory
[EMAIL
Damjan Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+/* winemenubuilder_semaphore ensures mutual exclusion for the temp file
*/
+tempfilename = heap_printf(%s/next-wine-menu.temp, xdg_config_dir);
That's not good enough, the config dir is global to all Wine
instances. You really need safe
Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SetRect( rect, 0, 0, width, height );
+rc_work = rect;
-if (root_window != DefaultRootWindow( gdi_display ) || !query_screens())
+if (!XGetWindowProperty( gdi_display, DefaultRootWindow(gdi_display),
x11drv_atom(_NET_WORKAREA),
I noticed that this introduced a glitch, because I didn't have a destination
callback for the \nesttableprops control word. This led to it being
ignored, so nested tables would take on default properties.
I will update this patch to fix this glitch and then resend it.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at
I finally threw together a summary of four sources of linux market
share data, see
http://kegel.com/linux/marketshare.html
Martin Profittlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
when trying to fix an issue with Guitar Rig 3 on Wine (Bug 10129, Guitar Rig
3 crashes), I found out something odd: The crash is affected by the size of
the SUBHEAP structure in dlls/ntdll/heap.c. Just by adding 8 unused bytes to
This sounds like a segment / Boundry issue... how far up does it repeat
this action? or have you tried??? is it an even number of blocks that the
error does not occur?
I tried this: I added DWORD reserved[N] to SUBHEAP and tested various values of
N. Odd numbers trigger an assertion due to
Your latest patch is already doing it right, IMPORTS must be changed to
d3dx9_36 and IMPORTLIB must stay d3dx9.
any idea to fix this problem?
David
2008/9/11 Tony Wasserka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mi, 2008-09-10 at 18:16 +0200, Tony wrote:
Michael Karcher wrote:
Have you tried to run with warn+heap? In that case, on each
HeapAlloc/HeapFree, heap integrity will be checked. Also freed blocks
are directly overwritten with dummy data. The behaviour of warn+heap
might be insightful.
warn+heap does not produce any additional
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Probably the app expects some heap block to be 16-byte aligned, and uses
MMX vector functions that crash on unaligned data. I guess you need to
figure out where the block comes from, and why it would always be
aligned on Windows. Maybe it's large enough that Windows
Ah wait, ignore my last answer to this email.
I misunderstood the way the IMPORTS var influences the make process.
I now see that it's actually the IMPORTS which are the libs, the
executable gets linked with. (and not the dll it is run with like I
though in the other mails)
However, I see no
It seems like I somehow missed the fact that patch was already accepted
on the first try, however I still ended up rebasing the patch against the
origin.
I'll resend it anyways, since the commit message needs to be changed.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Dylan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering how you were coming with your implementation of xinput1_3.dll ?
It sounds quite interesting although I would personally prefer the
wine implementation to be able to use all joysticks and not just Xbox
360 controllers. Perhaps another configuration screen could be added
to
Am Donnerstag, den 11.09.2008, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Martin Profittlich:
In this particular case, I think the crash log does not really indicate
an alignment problem, but a x/i $eip in winedbg on the crash might
help to check further. I suspect a [edx-1] address while edx contains a
NULL
Hi Vitaliy,
For the record here another reply but this time from Peter Hutterer the guy who
wrote the XI 2 specification. Is this all enough for Wine?
Roderick
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:29:45AM +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
I'm still not clear which one will provide the exact events
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:04 AM, chourmovs vs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No sorry
No time and no skill for that, but maybe i could help doing some tests
In that case I will have a try at implementing it. Can someone have a
look at this patch I made and offer any advice on where I may be going
Hi Dylan, commit 11c80396995065701205f2facb3dba10a6f8170f[1]
introduced a buffer overrun in riched20's editor.c. Here's the hunk
that did it:
@@ -666,35 +661,83 @@ static void ME_RTFParAttrHook(RTF_Info *info)
static void ME_RTFTblAttrHook(RTF_Info *info)
{
- ME_DisplayItem *para;
-
Hi Dylan, commit 11c80396995065701205f2facb3dba10a6f8170f[1]
introduced a buffer overrun in riched20's editor.c. Here's the hunk
that did it:
@@ -666,35 +661,83 @@ static void ME_RTFParAttrHook(RTF_Info *info)
static void ME_RTFTblAttrHook(RTF_Info *info)
{
- ME_DisplayItem *para;
-
2008/9/11 Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok what now I did a git to get the latest tree... I generated the
patch off the latest tree.. and submitted it again... what I am failing.
so I can fix it =).. the code compiles just fine and runs on my machine
so not sure...
chris
The patch is
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2008/9/11 Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok what now I did a git to get the latest tree... I generated the
patch off the latest tree.. and submitted it again... what I am failing.
so I can fix it =).. the code compiles just fine and runs on my machine
so not sure...
On Thursday 11 September 2008 20:50:58 Ismael Barros wrote:
On 9/10/08, Kai Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
dlls/dplayx/tests/dplayx.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Sorry for the delay, I should have checked this before. I hadn't even
read the coverity
2008/9/11 Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2008/9/11 Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok what now I did a git to get the latest tree... I generated the
patch off the latest tree.. and submitted it again... what I am failing.
so I can fix it =).. the code compiles
+switch (FVF 0xe)
You should use D3DFVF_POSITION_MASK instead of 0xe here.
+texture = FVF 16;
+
+for (i = 0; i ((FVFD3DFVF_TEXCOUNT_MASK) D3DFVF_TEXCOUNT_SHIFT);
i++)
+{
+ switch (texture 3)
+ {
+ case D3DFVF_TEXTUREFORMAT1:
+ size = size +
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dylan, commit 11c80396995065701205f2facb3dba10a6f8170f[1]
introduced a buffer overrun in riched20's editor.c.
Thanks for pointing out the problem.
I sent a patch to wine-patches that fixes the problem.
2008/9/11 Andrew Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In that case I will have a try at implementing it. Can someone have a
look at this patch I made and offer any advice on where I may be going
wrong (incorrect syntax, etc).
The directory should be called after the dll. Ie, xinput1_3 instead of
xinput.
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
Hi Vitaliy,
For the record here another reply but this time from Peter Hutterer the guy
who wrote the XI 2 specification. Is this all enough for Wine?
Roderick
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:29:45AM +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
I'm still not clear which
Chris Ahrendt wrote:
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patching file dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 448.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c.rej
Dan what does this mean on a patch I submitted tonight
That
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2008/9/11 Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2008/9/11 Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok what now I did a git to get the latest tree... I generated the
patch off the latest tree.. and submitted it again... what I am failing.
so I can fix it =)..
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Chris Ahrendt wrote:
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Chris Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patching file dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 448.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c.rej
Dan what does this mean on a patch I
Because the original code was set up with the numbers originally..
And this is wrong. So the original code is wrong here. The assumption the
code makes just happens to work for FLOAT1 to FLOAT4 D3DDECL types, and not
for higher ones
41 matches
Mail list logo
