"Jeremy White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch has triggered a bug in make test for me; I only notice it
> when I put a Windows flavor of arial.ttf into my windows/fonts directory.
>
> The specific failure is in get_glyph_indices when we're passing in a
> symbol charset (i.e. the 3rd loop
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James Hawkins wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually it was rejected because Dan's network went down and crashed
patchwatcher..
>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually it was rejected because Dan's network went down and crashed
>>> patchwatcher..
>>>
>>
>> Alexandre does n
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually it was rejected because Dan's network went down and crashed
>> patchwatcher..
>>
>
> Alexandre does not receive notices from patchwatcher, nor does he rely
> on the patchwatcher results whe
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> Actually it was rejected because Dan's network went down and crashed
> patchwatcher..
>
Alexandre does not receive notices from patchwatcher, nor does he rely
on the patchwatcher results when reviewing patches...
--
J
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It was not a broad sweep... I know where it crashed and am checking there.
>> However, I noticed there were several other places were at sometimes it
>> checked for null and other places it did not..
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> It was not a broad sweep... I know where it crashed and am checking there.
> However, I noticed there were several other places were at sometimes it
> checked for null and other places it did not.. so I went
> through an
James Hawkins wrote:
> 2008/10/8 Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> per dan resending
>>
>>
>> chris
>>
>> From e8ec03471e1206ea93fa6224d7c6b8b61422d80e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:02:36 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] Checked all the
Dan,
noticed something missing with winetricks...
when you install Vj# libraries.. it requires installer 3 and there is
only installer 2 in the list...
chris
"Aric Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c b/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c
> index 145be9b..c427694 100644
> --- a/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c
> +++ b/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c
> @@ -3408,8 +3408,8 @@ GdiFont *WineEngCreateFontInstance(DC *dc, HFONT hfont)
> */
> LIST_FO
2008/10/8 Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> per dan resending
>
>
> chris
>
> From e8ec03471e1206ea93fa6224d7c6b8b61422d80e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:02:36 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Checked all the states of variables in test to
Ops, sorry, you were not commenting my today patch. There's too much of
them lately... Anyway, I will send a fix tomorrow.
Jacek
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>
> I would say to remove the S_OK return but I really don't know what is
> the best here.
Thanks, I that's my temporary hack that I've missed then I was preparing
the patch. I will send put_disable implementation in next series of
patches. Otherwise I'd have to resend
2008/10/9 Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And yes I do think this data would be valuable. Especially for the
> d3d people who have a very rough idea of what to focus on (from what
> they've told us at wineconf).
>
That's not quite what Stefan said, actually. The issue is that while
there a
> | GLee provides a simple interface for using extensions and core OpenGL
> | functionality beyond OpenGL version 1.1, and automates the otherwise
> | tedious process of linking function pointers. GLee works with both C
> and
> | C++ compilers.
> |
> | Because the code is automatically generated, t
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:34 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>
>> Ok, then you need to clarify what your plan with this 'option' is. Is
>> this an option passed to configure that is disabled by default? If
>>
2008/10/8 Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Currently, we've got two problems:
> 1) We want to collect Wine usage data, so we know where to concentrate
> our efforts.
Just curious, but do any actual developers really care about this? My
feeling is that bugzilla gives a pretty good idea of what
Hello developers,
In http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056508.html
Peter Urbanec sent a patch I like, that adds timing information to the
log. It has been critized for having the wrong indentation style. As I
would like to give that patch a second chance, I reindented the code
Dmitry,
This patch has triggered a bug in make test for me; I only notice it
when I put a Windows flavor of arial.ttf into my windows/fonts directory.
The specific failure is in get_glyph_indices when we're passing in a
symbol charset (i.e. the 3rd loop). I've tracked it to line 3461 of
gdi32/fr
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Mark Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 13:20, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If someone only uses Wine periodically/infrequently, we're unlikely to see
>> it.
>>
>> Currently, we've got two problems:
>> 1) We want to collect Wi
> I was thinking of creating a control panel applet that invokes winecfg
> to only display the appearance/theme tab. This is to allow the theme
> selection command-line to share the code with the displaying of the
> configuration UI. That would be harder to do using a control panel.
Well, this is
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 13:20, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If someone only uses Wine periodically/infrequently, we're unlikely to see it.
>
> Currently, we've got two problems:
> 1) We want to collect Wine usage data, so we know where to concentrate
> our efforts.
Will the number of
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:34 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If developers are building from git and not enabling that option, we
>> wouldn't be bugged by it, only end users would.
>>
>
> Ok, then you need
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If developers are building from git and not enabling that option, we
> wouldn't be bugged by it, only end users would.
>
Ok, then you need to clarify what your plan with this 'option' is. Is
this an option passed to con
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:28 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If someone only uses Wine periodically/infrequently, we're unlikely to see
>> it.
>>
>> Currently, we've got two problems:
>> 1) We want to col
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If someone only uses Wine periodically/infrequently, we're unlikely to see it.
>
> Currently, we've got two problems:
> 1) We want to collect Wine usage data, so we know where to concentrate
> our efforts.
> 2) We don't w
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Chris Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we do Juan..
>>> reason being is that information is not always captured when people put
>>> things into bugzilla.. if we had a way that its entered initially (if we
>>> could gather it auto
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Louis. Lenders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> diff --git a/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c b/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c
> index 936d435..5aace9a 100644
> --- a/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c
> +++ b/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI MAPILogonEx(U
>>Are you guaranteed that session is not NULL?
>
> No, no garantueed, but i looked up some code-samples by google, and as far
> as i can tell, the current stub for MAPILogonEx will pass back garbage
> anyway to the application, so my thought was this patch would be rather
> harmless anyway.
Harmle
diff --git a/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c b/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c
index 936d435..5aace9a 100644
--- a/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c
+++ b/dlls/mapi32/mapi32_main.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI MAPILogonEx(ULONG_PTR uiparam,
LPWSTR profile,
{
FIXME("(0x%08lx %s %p 0x%08x %p) Stub\n", uip
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You guys need to realize that in any given day we, as developers,
>> destroy and recreate wineprefixes several times. Having a popup for
>> e
Juan Lang wrote:
>> I think we do Juan..
>> reason being is that information is not always captured when people put
>> things into bugzilla.. if we had a way that its entered initially (if we
>> could gather it automagically) then have them attach the file when they do
>> a bugzilla that might w
2008/10/8 Owen Rudge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
>> Reading up on the wineconf WWN issue, I noticed that it mentions
>> usability and winecfg. Therefore, I decided to dig up my RFC relating
>> to some ideas I had about winecfg that I sent to the list.
>
> Ah, lovely. This is something I'm plan
> I think we do Juan..
> reason being is that information is not always captured when people put
> things into bugzilla.. if we had a way that its entered initially (if we
> could gather it automagically) then have them attach the file when they do
> a bugzilla that might work a little better...
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so make it default not show, but allow distros to reverse that.
>
That doesn't solve the problem. We want usage statistics; therefore,
in this hypothetical situation we want the distros to enable it.
We're back to the
Juan Lang wrote:
>> Off hand:
>> distribution name/version
>> kernel version
>> lspci
>> graphics driver
>> gcc version
>
> Those strike me as a pretty large set, and perhaps more than people
> want to divulge. If they're having problems, with, say, graphics
> drivers or kernels, hopefully bugzil
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> You guys need to realize that in any given day we, as developers
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:06 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> You guys need to realize that in any given day we, as developers
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Off hand:
>> distribution name/version
>> kernel version
>> lspci
>> graphics driver
>> gcc version
>
> Those strike me as a pretty large set, and perhaps more than people
> want to divulge. If they're having problems, with, s
> Off hand:
> distribution name/version
> kernel version
> lspci
> graphics driver
> gcc version
Those strike me as a pretty large set, and perhaps more than people
want to divulge. If they're having problems, with, say, graphics
drivers or kernels, hopefully bugzilla will tell us that. I think
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I don't see why we need to ignore other prefixes. My concern was
>>> simply do we run this for every prefix creation and store it within
>>> th
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't see why we need to ignore other prefixes. My concern was
>> simply do we run this for every prefix creation and store it within
>> the prefix, or are we going to store it elsewhere, under for example:
>> '~/.loca
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You guys need to realize that in any given day we, as developers,
> destroy and recreate wineprefixes several times. Having a popup for
> every wineprefix creation will be extremely annoying. If this can't
> be done behi
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree.. and im curious: are there any other information bits we
> would like to collect or display at firstrun / wineprefixcreate? If
> people see other needs for it I think it might be appropriate for Wine
> to have
> I don't see why we need to ignore other prefixes. My concern was
> simply do we run this for every prefix creation and store it within
> the prefix, or are we going to store it elsewhere, under for example:
> '~/.local/wine/survey-status'.
>
> Either way, I'd love to see this done, I'm moreso jus
Hello Jacek,
Smatch complains about unreachable code introduced by this patch:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Module: wine
> Branch: master
> Commit: 536fac7c1b4ef7f6f124d7f3100d3284313f3018
> URL:
> http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=536fac7c1b4ef7f6f124d7f3100d3284313f3018
>
>
Hi all,
> Reading up on the wineconf WWN issue, I noticed that it mentions
> usability and winecfg. Therefore, I decided to dig up my RFC relating
> to some ideas I had about winecfg that I sent to the list.
Ah, lovely. This is something I'm planning on doing some work on, once I get
a bit more
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:19 PM, James McKenzie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven Edwards wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> If it's stored in WINEPREFIX, then each time a new prefix is used,
>>> they'll get the prompt each time. Then again
Rob Shearman wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> 2008/10/8 Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Rob Shearman wrote:
>>> Add tests for this.
>>> ---
>>> dlls/wininet/tests/urlcache.c | 25 +
>>> dlls/wininet/urlcache.c | 14 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+),
Hi Paul,
2008/10/8 Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Rob Shearman wrote:
>>
>> Add tests for this.
>> ---
>> dlls/wininet/tests/urlcache.c | 25 +
>> dlls/wininet/urlcache.c | 14 ++
>> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>
> Is t
Rob Shearman wrote:
> Add tests for this.
> ---
> dlls/wininet/tests/urlcache.c | 25 +
> dlls/wininet/urlcache.c | 14 ++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
Hi Rob,
Is the following test needed for an app?
+ret = Retrieve
"Lei Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In regedit, while renaming registry keys / values, the delete key does
> not work. This should fix it.
>
> This version increased the len variable by 1, so comparing "Edit" to
> "EditX" will fail.
Testing class names is almost always the wrong thing to do
53 matches
Mail list logo
