Guy Albertelli wrote:
Enhance QueryDosDevice test for attempting to return all devices.
Add tests for GetVolumeInformationA testing the different root dir formats.
---
dlls/kernel32/tests/volume.c | 134 +-
1 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 3 deletions(
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> Try2: This time with the patch.
>
> Tested on Win2k/WinXP. Marked two tests as todo_wine.
>
If you're having to add todo_wine, then you're changing the current
tests, which is bad if all you're trying to do is handle another case
(running on
2009/4/9 EA Durbin :
> After all we don't want to vastly increase our potential customer base and
> potentially get several $70 per crossover professional license or $40 per
> standard license fees, but rather wait until someone writes a hefty check to
> port it up front.
You're confusing Wine wit
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:29 PM, EA Durbin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, AllenDavidNiven
> globalfone.biz> wrote:
>> who can i pay to make this on the wine that i have
>> is $100 ok ?
>>
>
>>That's generous of you, but also humorous. I can't remember the last
>>estimate we had of how m
Hallo,
I tried to run Alexander Morozov's patches against wine-git with libusb and
ftd2x devices.
Two remarks:
- The files from ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/people/amorozov/usb/current/ miss
lines in configure.ac to trigger the Makefile generation for usbd.sys and
usbhub.sys.
- The HardwareID in t
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Paul Vriens wrote:
> From: Paul Vriens
> Subject: Re: possible NULL dereference?
> To: "Joris Huizer"
> Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org
> Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 7:53 AM
> Joris Huizer wrote:
> > Looking at git commit
> dcb3e52e2dfd0d6e494164932fb2b684d463a005, it seems,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, AllenDavidNiven
globalfone.biz> wrote:
> who can i pay to make this on the wine that i have
> is $100 ok ?
>
>That's generous of you, but also humorous. I can't remember the last
>estimate we had of how much work it would take, but it's on the order
>of tens of t
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Austin English wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Warren Dumortier wrote:
>> Hello everybody...
>>
>> My patch to add advanced d3d settings in winecfg is almost ready.
>> In fact, i only have to figure out how to detect video memory size to
>> display it when
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Warren Dumortier wrote:
> Hello everybody...
>
> My patch to add advanced d3d settings in winecfg is almost ready.
> In fact, i only have to figure out how to detect video memory size to
> display it when no key is set to force it or to reset. Stefan D told
> me to
2009/4/9 Juan Lang :
> Hi Warren,
>
>> Everything works well and i would like some feedback.
>
> + if (!strcmp(buf, "enabled"))
> + CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_CHECKED);
> + else
> + CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_UNCHECKED);
> + H
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> The problem with the current arrangement is that when machines pop in and
> out, any failures that are more likely on those machines also pop in and
> out, so error counts fluctuate, which obscures the smaller changes due to
> wine fixes or regres
Dragon Naturally Speaking crashes after prolonged use, but the amount of time
one can use it before it crashes crept up about 2 minutes, using today's git.
Today I dictated for about 14 minutes until it crashed.
That's progress.
Susan
The problem with the current arrangement is that when machines pop in and
out, any failures that are more likely on those machines also pop in and
out, so error counts fluctuate, which obscures the smaller changes due to
wine fixes or regressions.
I like the current output, and don't want to change
Dan Kegel writes:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alexandre Julliard
> wrote:
>> Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones
>> is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't
>> think we want to split them.
>
> But suppressing or splitting
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
>> But suppressing or splitting the results from machines
>> that don't have a full set of results shouldn't hurt...
>>
> How many runs should have a box have before it's considered for the 'stable'
> list? We have 2 months worth of data, which r
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones
is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't
think we want to split them.
But suppressing or splitting the results fro
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones
> is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't
> think we want to split them.
But suppressing or splitting the results from machines
that
Rob Shearman writes:
> 2009/4/9 Dan Kegel :
>> (This was last discussed in February, e.g.
>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
>>
>> The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
>> would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
>>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Rob Shearman wrote:
>> Removing these two sources of noise might be as simple as
>> 1) omit 64 bit results, and
>
> Not a bad idea, but I would suggest classifying these machines as a
> different category (I would suggest "other" for the moment) rather
> than omitti
Hi Warren,
> Everything works well and i would like some feedback.
+if (!strcmp(buf, "enabled"))
+CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_CHECKED);
+else
+CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_UNCHECKED);
+HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, buf);
T
Hi,
I would like to know what's the status on the TaskDialog implementation
in Wine based on the code I gave to Dan Kegel months ago.
Relevant threads:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069724.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069800.html
Than
2009/4/9 Dan Kegel :
> (This was last discussed in February, e.g.
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
>
> The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
> would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
>
> I can think of two sources of
2009/4/9 Scott Ritchie :
> Joel Holdsworth wrote:
>>>
>>> Has anyone else noticed
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
>>> which is shown on the right side of
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
>>> It's kind of cool. Hats off to
>>> http://en.wikipedi
Paul Vriens wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Paul Vriens
wrote:
2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
running the tests
So what constitutes a stable machine?
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that the set of machines reportin
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
>> I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
>> I was complaining that the set of machines reporting test
>> results varies.
>
> Ok, got it. So how do we come up with a stable set?
My suggestion for that was:
2) omit computers for which resu
Joel Holdsworth wrote:
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
who put it together.
- Da
2009/4/9 Joel Holdsworth :
>> Has anyone else noticed
>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
>> which is shown on the right side of
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
>> It's kind of cool. Hats off to
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
>> wh
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
running the tests
So what constitutes a stable machine?
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that the set of machines reporting test
results varie
> Has anyone else noticed
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
> which is shown on the right side of
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
> It's kind of cool. Hats off to
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
> who put it together.
> - Dan
Yes th
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
>> 2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
>> running the tests
>
> So what constitutes a stable machine?
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that the set of machines reporting test
results varies.
- Dan
Dan Kegel wrote:
(This was last discussed in February, e.g.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
I can think of two sources of noise:
1) 32
On Di, 2009-03-17 at 15:56 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> You will probably find graphedt.exe from the microsoft sdk useful,
A GPL alternative exists, but does not work in Wine yet:
http://blog.monogram.sk/janos/tools/monogram-graphstudio/
--
By by ... Detlef
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
who put it together.
- Dan
Thanks for the clarification about todo_wine, Paul
Paul Vriens wrote:
>Well I don't think it will be accepted as is. We usually don't add
>functions that are not used anywhere especially when the comments say
>that there is a bug elsewhere that should be fixed first.
Well, I was thinking about d
Hi Paul,
> From: Paul Vriens [mailto:paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com]
> > Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> > Try 2: Add buffer overflow tests
> >
> > Changelog:
> > secur32/tests: Add simple tests for GetUserNameExA/W()
> >
> > ---
> > dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c | 86
> > ++
(This was last discussed in February, e.g.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
I can think of two sources of noise:
1) 32 and 64 bit results
Andreas Rosenberg wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
And the subject of the mail should be a bit more than just
"advapi32/tests".
Oops, sry. Read the second mail after resending in the patch
containing your first suggestions.
But I'm a bit confused about the meaning of todo_wine.
todo_wine discards ou
2009/4/8 James Hawkins :
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, AllenDavidNiven
> wrote:
>> who can i pay to make this on the wine that i have
>> is $100 ok ?
>>
>
> That's generous of you, but also humorous. I can't remember the last
> estimate we had of how much work it would take, but it's on the o
Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 01:47:33 schrieb Tobias Jakobi:
> Fixed patch according to stefand's suggestions.
>
> Please disregard the old one and use this patch instead.
Looks ok to me I guess
Paul Vriens wrote:
>And the subject of the mail should be a bit more than just
"advapi32/tests".
Oops, sry. Read the second mail after resending in the patch
containing your first suggestions.
But I'm a bit confused about the meaning of todo_wine.
todo_wine discards output from failed tests, if I
Hello everybody...
My patch to add advanced d3d settings in winecfg is almost ready.
In fact, i only have to figure out how to detect video memory size to
display it when no key is set to force it or to reset. Stefan D told
me to use DirectDraw, but i wouldn't find.
So that is the last thing (exc
Andreas Rosenberg wrote:
Added a test to verify result of LookupAccountSid
The test fails here:
security.c:1599: Test failed: LookupAccountSidA() Expected account name:
paul got: INTERACTIVE
I guess this is the tes
Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 09:34:22 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> 2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger :
> > @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI
> > IDirect3DVertexBuffer9Impl_GetDesc(LPDIRECT3DVERTEXBUFFER9 pDesc->Usage =
> > desc.Usage;
> > pDesc->Pool = desc.Pool;
> > pDesc->Size = desc
Installed variable has always the same value. What about removing it instead ?
Bye,
Christian
> Message du 09/04/09 07:10
> De : "Rein Klazes"
> A : "wine-patches"
> Copie à :
> Objet : win87em: always return that a 8087 coprocessor is present. (try 2)
>
>
> ---
> dlls/win87em.dll16/win87em
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
Try 2: Add buffer overflow tests
Changelog:
secur32/tests: Add simple tests for GetUserNameExA/W()
---
dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c | 86
++
1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hi Ge,
The tests show a big list
2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger :
> @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI
> IDirect3DVertexBuffer9Impl_GetDesc(LPDIRECT3DVERTEXBUFFER9
> pDesc->Usage = desc.Usage;
> pDesc->Pool = desc.Pool;
> pDesc->Size = desc.Size;
> -pDesc->FVF = desc.FVF;
> pDesc->Type
2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger :
> +hr = IWineD3DDevice_SetIndices(This->wineD3DDevice, This->indexbuffer,
> + WINED3DFMT_R16_UINT /* d3d7 uses uints
> */);
The comment is inconsistent with the code (and probably redundant to
begin with).
47 matches
Mail list logo
