I have had good experiences with Landmark Financial in Denver.Good
folks.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 6/4/2010 11:52 PM, David wrote:
Both CTI and Boun at doubleradius can help get you with honest leasing
companies.
David
-Original Message-
From:
If you have a good business plan your probably better off dealing with a
local bank IMO. If you cant convince the bank your business plan is good
then something might be wrong with your business plan. We do out of pocket
now but several years ago after showing the bank our business plan they
While leasing is a viable option, I would seriously take a look at the programs
the SBA has to offer
I'm in the process of finalizing an SBA 504 loan for $400k
You need to put down 10%, but if that's not a problem, it's perfect for this
space as it specifically deals with hard asset
I know they call it 4G, but it's not 4G. See
http://www.wirelessweek.com/Archives/2007/10/WiMAX-is-3G/
Even LTE (when deployed) won't be 4G, only LTE Advanced will, but LTE
will be much closer to 4G than WiMAX 802.16e, see
I've seen articles saying that (I haven't read any of them), but I don't
buy it.
Just a few bloggers trying to make a stink.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 6/5/2010 9:30 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
I know they call it 4G, but it's not 4G. See
If you are willing to spend a few dollars on an ITU-R document, it's
this one that describes 4G:
http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.1645-0-200306-I/en
(Framework and overall objectives of the future development of
IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000)
The most famous quote from this document is the
I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet port
is connected to the NanostationM5's secondary port. The NanostationM5 is
doing POE pass through and powering the BulletM2. The NanostationM5 the
BulletM2 is connected to is the far end of a pair of NanostationM5's
They are linux based.
Use ethtool interface
Regards
Michael Baird
I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet
port is connected to the NanostationM5's secondary port. The NanostationM5
is doing POE pass through and powering the BulletM2. The NanostationM5 the
Just guessing, but could they require a crossover cable when both are
forced? According to Wikipedia Auto-MDIX requires the speed and
duplex setting to be set to auto.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-MDIX
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a
Thanks! I'll check it.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
They are linux based.
Use ethtool interface
Regards
Michael Baird
I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet
port is connected to the NanostationM5's secondary port. The
Great idea. I'll try that.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
Just guessing, but could they require a crossover cable when both are
forced? According to Wikipedia Auto-MDIX requires the speed and
duplex setting to be set to auto.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-MDIX
I read a bit about ethtool and then gave it a shot but this was all I got. I
iterated through eth0 through eth12 and got nothing.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Cannot get device settings: No such device
Cannot get wake-on-lan settings: No such device
Cannot get message level: No such
Try ifconfig first, Ubiquiti doesn't call their interfaces eth0 and
eth1, they call them eth0_real and eth1_real.
Regards
Michael Baird
I read a bit about ethtool and then gave it a shot but this was all I got. I
iterated through eth0 through eth12 and got nothing.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0
Thanks! That worked.
ifconfig got me:
XM.v5.2# ifconfig
ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:6D:F0:1C:0E
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC ALLMULTI MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:252008 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:249081 errors:0
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear back to the
router. At one box I'm getting this. Instead of a speed it's saying
Unknown!(0). and it's only negotiated half duplex.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0_real
Settings for eth0_real:
Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
Sounds like you found the issue.
Regards
Michael Baird
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear back to the
router. At one box I'm getting this. Instead of a speed it's saying
Unknown!(0). and it's only negotiated half duplex.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0_real
Settings
Try a calculated interest of 35% to 45%. :-((No, I did not accept)
What frustrates me is that most lease companies wont give a rate or payment
before they pull a credit report, even if prospect sends them a copy of
theirs that was pulled a week earlier. After they pull the credit report,
Charles,
Thanks for the Info/Link.
In 2009, SBA had a great program based on a ARRA program, for a basic small
business loan for any purpose.
They were increasing the SBA guarantee to 90% of loan value (instead of I
think it used to be 80% or less).
That made it way easy to obtain a bank loan,
Yeah. Thanks!
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
Sounds like you found the issue.
Regards
Michael Baird
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear back to the
router. At one box I'm getting this. Instead of a speed it's saying
Unknown!(0). and
Actually no. Turns out that's the port that has nothing else but the POE
injector connected. The search goes on.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
Sounds like you found the issue.
Regards
Michael Baird
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear
Did a crossover cable fix it?
http://ubnt.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18882
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually no. Turns out that's the port that has nothing else but the POE
injector connected. The search goes on.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:27
Interesting - My NSM5 shows connected @ 100Mbps/Full but my DLink
router shows it @ 100Mbps/Half. It is set for Full/Auto. Running 5.2.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Try ifconfig first, Ubiquiti doesn't call their interfaces eth0 and
eth1, they
I'm going to try that when I find one. I have one here somewhere but haven't
found it yet. I could make one but I don't have many RJ45s and since I'm in the
jungle I don't want to blow them on something that's not a necessity. I do
believe if I had the cross over cable then I could force the
I just did some tests with my setup (radio, router, laptop). It ONLY
likes the port set to AUTO. Anything else causes it to disconnect or
act flaky. You might still need the crossover though as I didnt test
between 2 radios. Of course you could use a switch if no crossover is
available.
On Sat,
What???! I can't get MY DEDICATED T1 for 50 bucks?! I'm outraged and
totally ripped off!
B-b
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 10:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
:(
Sounds like a lot of my customers out in the sticks who fell for the 3g
pitch.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 11:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] sprint 4g
And if it's ever down someone is there in 15 minutes. Up and running
in 5. And can apply unlimited coupons from the paper 4 years ago.
On 6/5/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
What???! I can't get MY DEDICATED T1 for 50 bucks?! I'm outraged and
totally ripped off!
B-b
If need be, since you have low supply of connectors, if you have any bad
patch cables, cut, cross the tx/rx and splice it just to test. Any true
wire geek never throws bad patch away.
:)
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Actually, I've been running into a very similar issue. We have a customer
who has a Nanobridge M5 plugged into a Cisco router. It mostly doesn't work
with auto negotiation, (90+% packet loss), and it doesn't work at all on
100mbps full forced. It workes great at 10full forced on both ends, but
Here I have two NanostationM5s as a backhaul. On one end (the router end of the
link) the NSM5 is wired to a PS2 via their secondary ethernet ports. If I put
that NS5M in 100Mbps full dup it works fine, but the PS2 it's connected to
doesn't offer (via the GUI) the option of forcing the ethernet
Good idea! I have some cables with the connector tab broken. I'll hack one
tomorrow and see what happens.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Robert West wrote:
If need be, since you have low supply of connectors, if you have any bad
patch cables, cut, cross the tx/rx and splice it just to
Cisco's are finiky Keep in mind that if you are going to force the
Ubnt Radio to 100Full.. then you should be doing the same to the Cisco
as well.
Having said that, I will share a recent experience..
We have qty 3 runs of outdoor shielded cable run done within flexible
conduit, inside
32 matches
Mail list logo
