Forgive me if it's changed in newer versions, on version 8 you would
go to Reports | Financial | Query-based Accounting Reports, then fill
in the start and end dates, select Payments and hit run. It's in
there, it's a very common report that we run and it would be nice to
have it be one button for
If you cant then every government emergency service agency around here is in
trouble!
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I know you can mount above it. Tons of towers around here do.
> On Dec 2, 2010 9:24 PM, "Christopher Hair" wrote:
> > At what height must a beacon light be
We just recently switched to Freeside from Platypus. One of the reasons
was to give more control over integration. Although the biggest
complaint I had with Plat was that it took 10 clicks to get to the
information I wanted...
With Freeside, we have it set up to add entries into FreeRadius, ass
Check with the FAA FSDO that covers the area
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect
-Original Message-
From: "Christopher Hair"
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:23:56
To: ; 'WISPA General List'
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Subject: [W
Have you looked at MTUs on the client PCs?
If they have Windows PCs, download TCP Optimizer and set the MTU down to
1472 or less.
A lot of ADSL circuits use PPPoE and it adds overhead. By dropping the
MTU to allow for the PPPoE overhead, things will start working. IF
testing show that this make
I know you can mount above it. Tons of towers around here do.
On Dec 2, 2010 9:24 PM, "Christopher Hair" wrote:
> At what height must a beacon light be placed on a tower. Can anything be
> mounted above the beacon light? Or must the beacon be at the highest point
> on the tower? I have done sever
Wouldn't it be up the the NAS (e.g. your MT PPPoE server) to support it?
But yes, you could probably script something to remove the session
directly on the NAS in the same number of lines of code as you could
trigged the PoD from your RADIUS server.
-Kristian
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 18:21 -0500, Jo
Normis says "PPPoE doesn't support CoA, only PoD.". So you can do it
with PoD I guess (which is new to me). How many devices support this?
Seems it could be done from the server, but that's as much effort as
just severing the pppoe session.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
I don't use RADIUS for PPPoE, so forgive me ignorance, but isn't that
possible with a CoA or PoD request...
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RADIUS_Client#Change_of_Authorization
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20604&start=0
-Kristian
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 18:00 -0500, Josh
The problem I have with Radius is that you have no way to shut them
off. You would have to change the profile (easy) and have the device
reauthenticate (not as easy).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM,
Dunno man, and it's probably not worth bothering her over unless it's
important to you to know how she does it (let me know if you'd like to
know). I know that we don't record invoices or payments in Quickbooks.
On 12/2/2010 2:48 PM, Tony C. Loosle wrote:
the reports don't exisit.
how does sh
the reports don't exisit.
how does she get a list of paid checks out of the system to match up for a deposit? I would love to know that one!
> LOL that reminds me of Beavis & Butthead, where all things in the
> world are lumped into two categories: "This RULES" and "THIS SUCKS".
>
> Tony,
Thought I would just chime back in a little bit on this subject:
No experience with Powercode, but with Platypus we can do RADIUS (PPPoE)
authentication and control the profiles from within Platypus with account
types, assign the appropriate rate limiting, static IP addresses, etc etc -
everyth
I disagree but I can't convince you why. Definitely see where you're coming
from.
On Dec 2, 2010 4:22 PM, "Mark Nash" wrote:
> I think it goes deeper than that. It seems that if Bertram Wireless can
> use it, it gets done. If UnwiredWest needs it, well they're just a
> paying customer...
>
> On 1
I think it goes deeper than that. It seems that if Bertram Wireless can
use it, it gets done. If UnwiredWest needs it, well they're just a
paying customer...
On 12/2/2010 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Oh I know what you mean. It seems they didn't care about anything
until Simon showed up.
Oh I know what you mean. It seems they didn't care about anything until
Simon showed up. I think we completed the 477 tool and I have seen a couple
changes/corrections myself, do I feel a lot better in the last month or two.
On Dec 2, 2010 4:12 PM, "Mark Nash" wrote:
> This is what I'm talking a
This is what I'm talking about though, Josh.
We identified this problem late in 2009. We were told it would be
fixed. I'm not trying to be sarcastic here, but I know that's how it
sounds. There are no other words to use.
On 12/2/2010 1:10 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
That's what I was referri
That's what I was referring to, too. They aren't applied to a class. I was
told that will be fixed. Glad there aren't MORE things to be concerned
about.
On Dec 2, 2010 3:54 PM, "Mark Nash" wrote:
> Bandwidth throttling does not work with remote subnets. We have to put
> in Mikrotik queues for a
Just remembered, BillMax is a WISPA member.
On 12/2/2010 3:12 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
> It depends on how sophisticated a ticketing system you need and what you
> mean by monitor, but I really like my BillMax implementation and it does
> have hooks to do whatever else you want, or to integrate into
LOL that reminds me of Beavis & Butthead, where all things in the world
are lumped into two categories: "This RULES" and "THIS SUCKS".
Tony, your network may be much bigger than mine so billing problems show
up more frequently, but, IMHO, billing is alright, not great, not
perfect, just good.
Powercode may be great with the BMU, but as for a billing system is really sucks!
Forget about basic accounting reports and simply things like a check deposit. Yes, customers still pay with a check. Forget about it in powercode!
> I agree. Do NOT even consider paying for Powercode unless y
Bandwidth throttling does not work with remote subnets. We have to put
in Mikrotik queues for any customer who has a remote subnet. Also
delinquent customers do not get shut off if they are using a remote subnet.
On 12/2/2010 12:50 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
What issues with remote subnets? I
What issues with remote subnets? I have no issues with mine. There are
missing classes and such that may be fixed soon.
On Dec 2, 2010 3:35 PM, "Mark Nash" wrote:
> I agree. Do NOT even consider paying for Powercode unless you intend to
> integrate with the BMU (bandwidth) management. That's wh
$800/mo buys you 10 hours of Freeside programming a month, and 30%
discount beyond that...
http://freeside.biz/freeside/services.html
We've been using and contributing to Freeside for ~11 years now. Just
my $.02.
-Kristian
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:33 -0800, Mark Nash wrote:
> I agree. Do NOT
I agree. Do NOT even consider paying for Powercode unless you intend to
integrate with the BMU (bandwidth) management. That's where the real
power is, though we're having problems still, with about 5 percent of
our customers (those who have remote subnets, like a /30 or /29 or
/24). Also som
I believe that a major turn will be the Maxx. I don't understand how so
much could be done via shell to begin with (Imagestream).
The bmu is what makes the product work for your business. If you just do
tickets, bills and such you're wasting your money.
I care most about getting it done. Phon
It depends on how sophisticated a ticketing system you need and what you
mean by monitor, but I really like my BillMax implementation and it does
have hooks to do whatever else you want, or to integrate into other
systems. It does not require an onsite person to get it setup and do
the integra
Dude, talk with Josh more before you decide that you don't go with
them. There's GOT to be something he's doing that I'm not. I've got
alot invested in PowerCode, and I wish it would "turn the corner" for me
but it hasn't.
On 12/2/2010 12:03 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
> That is hilarious. I jus
Josh, I know that you & I have had completely different experiences with
them. No problem there, it is what it is. It sounds like you're
experiencing what I had hoped to experience from them.
My point is that I got very frustrated with their phone system being so
made of bubble gum & duct tap
On 1 December 2010 16:51, Tom Sharples wrote:
> Hi, we need to install an aprox. 8 mile PTP 5.8Ghz link near the Big Island
> in Hawaii. One end will be at about 50ft MSL, while the other end is at
> about 3500ft. The first 4 miles are over water, with rest over moderately
> hilly terrain to a fr
That is hilarious. I just tried it and you weren't joking. I was going to
inquire about pricing but guess I won't.
Sent from my iPhone4
On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Mark Nash wrote:
> Man... Don't get me started on PowerCode today. I just tried calling
> their sales line. 920-351-1010.
>
>
Hrm when it comes to sales I just call Kevin directly. That's like once a year.
I call support very sparingly. In the last ~16 hours we've emailed
back half a dozen times on three topics. Have you tried emailing
them? Not saying they shouldn't answer the phone, but rather a
solution to the pro
Man... Don't get me started on PowerCode today. I just tried calling
their sales line. 920-351-1010.
Go ahead, call it. I dare you.
If I had a phone system like theirs I would have been out of business
long ago...
Their MAIN greeting sounds like it was recorded A) on a speakerphone and
B) in
Platypus 7 will be out in January and supposedly is going to include some of
the things that have been missing. I know that Wombat (the help desk
system) will now be built into it as opposed to being an add-on component.
They are also touting improved services and features specifically for
WISP's.
Just buy an anti-gravity belt.
Solved.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [TowerTalk] Breaking all the
towerclimbingrule
- Original Message -
From: "n4zkf"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Breaking all the tower climbing rulesat an
amazingheight...
> Horse Hockey! "The safer a situation seems to be breeds complacency,
> that's
> when accidents happen"
> That's th
To do everything at once, your options are Powercode and Azotel.
Bits and pieces will require an expert on site (Freeside, Platypus, etc).
Platypus is not a back end system so it doesn't compare to Powercode.
Platypus only bills, but has some plugins to work with some things
here and there.
I am
Has any of you ever tired Powercode as a backend systems?
Does anyone have experience with it compared to Platypus?
We have a number of customers ranging between the 300 to 700 clients.
I am trying to find a solution I maybe able to recommend them.
Billing is an important piece but it also needs
Too many videos watching people get caught in the tower features
(antennas, ladder rungs, etc). Plus it is a lot of weight that is
unnecessary when things are done right.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:21
Does anyone ever think of wearing a parachute as a last resort? I'm sure
it's a silly question, but base jumpers would do it.
Regards,
Jeff
ImageStream Sales Manager
800-813-5123 x106
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Se
At all times, 100%, above 6 feet. No exceptions.
On Dec 2, 2010 11:14 AM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" wrote:
> That's just flippin' nuts! My hands got all sweaty just watching!
>
>
>
> Aren't you supposed to be tied off at all times during a tower climb?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
> ImageStream Sales
That's just flippin' nuts! My hands got all sweaty just watching!
Aren't you supposed to be tied off at all times during a tower climb?
Regards,
Jeff
ImageStream Sales Manager
800-813-5123 x106
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of J
Everytime I see that video, my knees shake.
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:52 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
> No such thing as the Sears Tower. It is Willis Tower now ;)
>
> On Dec 2, 2010 9:38 AM, "Cameron Crum" wrote:
> > And I like how the brilliant people who made the video don't even
> know it's
>
I'm thinking of putting the additional Omni to try to ease things. If
things work out well, then I'll just install other panels on 10mhz and
any new install would be on 10mhz. Also, keep those old equipment on the
20mhz panels since we don't have the funds to replace them.
Don't know if having 4
No such thing as the Sears Tower. It is Willis Tower now ;)
On Dec 2, 2010 9:38 AM, "Cameron Crum" wrote:
> And I like how the brilliant people who made the video don't even know
it's
> a "guyed" tower not a "guided" tower (near the beginning where they are
> comparing it against the Sears and Ei
Are you thinking about putting the additional Omni/Bullet as a temp
solution to decommission the older radio/sector to some newer radio /
sectors ?
You will have to try it.. you might be able to do that
If you are thinking of this as a long term solution... then keep in mind
"Omni Antenna(
Sounds like a MTU issue on the network.
You may want to check things by doing IP pings with specific packet size
to determine this. (best to google for IP MTU issues, for more info).
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
On 12/2/2010 10:21 AM, Optimum Wireless Services wrote:
> Marlon.
>
> Th
We have 4 sector antennas on a couple of our towers but, they're getting
too much noise and interference from all over the area. I'm wanted to
install a bullet on each tower at 10Mhz so, I can transfer many of our
ns2 to it. I can't do it on the panels because we have older equipment
that don't sup
Up?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 12/2/2010 8:38 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:
And I like how the brilliant people who made the video don't even know
it's a "guyed" tower not a "guided" tower (near the beginning where
they are comparing it against the
Marlon.
That's exactly how things are in our network. Speedtest look good but,
once the client goes to Facebook and Hotmail things just don't work
well.
Any solution or suggestions?
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:22 -0800, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> Oh yeah, we'd run speed tests and they'd look great
Why do that next to each other, I don't see the point of two omni's next
to each other and 10mhz and 20 mhz, why not sectors?
Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108
On 12/2/2010 9:57 AM, Optimum Wireless
Also, both antennas might be installed on the same tower next to each
other.
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:50 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote:
> I guess both on different channels: 20mhz on channel 1 and the other on
> channel 9.
>
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:44 -0600, Cameron Crum wrote:
>
I guess both on different channels: 20mhz on channel 1 and the other on
channel 9.
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:44 -0600, Cameron Crum wrote:
> What channels?
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Optimum Wireless Services
> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Just a quick stupid question:
>
What channels?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Optimum Wireless Services <
wil...@optimumwireless.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Just a quick stupid question:
>
> If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with
> 10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would the
Hello.
Just a quick stupid question:
If I have two omni antennas both transmitting at 2.4GHz but, one with
10MHz channel width and the other with normal 20MHz width; would they
interfere with each other?
WISPA Wan
And I like how the brilliant people who made the video don't even know it's
a "guyed" tower not a "guided" tower (near the beginning where they are
comparing it against the Sears and Eiffel Towers). Where are they guiding
it?
Cameron
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Schmidt wrote:
> ...t
We use 5.8Ghz PTP & PTMP and 900Mhz PTMP to reach customers on the other
side of a lake about 2.2 miles wide. AP side is on a 40ft pole mounted at
the edge of the lake shore. SM's are approx. 25 feet above the water on the
other side. This site has been running now for about 18 months without any
i
My experience with Meraki is they come in and run backhaul links on 40
Mhz. channels regardless of what bandwidth is going out the other end.
You could have 1 workstation and they run 40 MHz. channels.
They are not a frequency efficient company when they pollute spectrum
the way they do.
Not
58 matches
Mail list logo