My boss just picked up a Rocket M2 and a few PicoStation 2s for a free WiFi
access point situation.
Basically, it's going to be a star grid running WDS from the Rocket to each
Pico with AP access at each location.
My problem is the Rocket doesn't seem to want to do AP-Repeater for some
reason,
? What makes you think the Rocket is acting as a station?
First, can you define a few? The suggestion of what you want to do
is almost certainly a bad idea and will result in poor performance
unless you are only planning to feed the main AP with a meg or two.
None-the-less. If you insist
Not my choice on setup but his... I'm thinking he's only going to have
about 3 Pico's and the Rocket.
Basically, I can connect to a PicoStation from my laptop. With just the
Rocket on, it isn't acting as an AP.
The PicoStation's can connect to the Rocket without any issues. So imho
that tends
With just the rocket on it isn't acting as an AP? You've got something
misconfigured then.
Can you attach a screenshot of your MAIN Rocket tab as well as the
WIRELESS tab?
On 10/11/12 10:02 AM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
Not my choice on setup but his... I'm thinking he's only going to have
I just did a setup similar to this a couple days ago for a temp setup for
PGA tournament. Even though I knew better, I forgot to turn off AirMax on
all AP-Repeaters and almost pulled my hair until I remembered it.
Matt Brendle - NCW
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
That was his problem ;-) He just hit me up off list.
Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312
On 10/11/12 10:46 AM, Matt Brendle wrote:
I just did a setup similar to this a couple days ago for a temp setup for
PGA tournament. Even though I knew
We currently use Ubiquiti radios in bridge mode and assign a ip address to
the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using the Ubiquiti radio as a router.
Would like feed back why one would do this when it appears customers would
be double natted when they hook up their routers?
Or does
Very few customers know any difference.
On 10/11/2012 3:46 PM, Arthur Stephens wrote:
We currently use Ubiquitiradios in bridge mode and
assign a ip address to the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using theUbiquitiradio as a
Almost all of my customers have NAT'ed Ubnt CPE radios. The handful that
need a static get charged for it (or free if business) and then I do the
port forwrading for them.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at
We run Ubiquiti CPE in router mode and it acts as the NAT router for
the customer. We install a wifi router inside as part of standard
install package, but just run it as a switch+AP. This gives us more
visibility into customer network for troubleshooting and abuse
detection (why does this house
All my customers are natted at the CPE unless they have Static IP. Actually we
Nat at the AP as well. So they are triple Natted and I have lots of customers
doing VPN's and every form of video and music and have never had one problem.
Pro's:
Customer can plug PC right into POE or switch and
We do it because it makes customer maintenance a lot easier. They can
replace/remove their router without having to call the office or
changing settings in their computer or router, everything comes with
DHCP enabled default. There are very few places where the customer will
ever know. If
We run MT, not UBNT, CPE, but it doesn't matter what brand it is. We run
them in as routers, but do not NAT. Same benefits others mentioned for
routing, just one fewer NAT. Never have a problem with it this way and
can't see any good reason to NAT there.
On 10/11/2012 3:46 PM, Arthur
I did this for the first time last week. It seems to work fine.
On 10/11/2012 12:46 PM, Arthur Stephens
wrote:
We currently use Ubiquitiradios in bridge mode and
assign a ip address to the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using
Not sure I under stand the no-NAT, so every device on the other side of
the CPE has it's own public IP?
On 10/11/2012 4:53 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
We run MT, not UBNT, CPE, but it doesn't matter what brand it is. We
run them in as routers, but do not NAT. Same benefits others
mentioned for
At 10/11/2012 06:52 PM, SamT wrote:
Not sure I under stand the no-NAT, so every device on the other side
of the CPE has it's own public IP?
There could be one NAT, at the access point.
My taste, which to be sure I haven't tested at scale in a wireless
network (but plan to), is to follow what
I do wish they made it a bit more carrier in that regard. I use PPPoE because
I can control everything that way, but it sure would be nice to use something
to control all of that business, then let their device manage IPs... just like
cable.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
17 matches
Mail list logo
