On 12/16/17 9:39 AM, Vance Shipley wrote:
>
> Sure they did. What would you do if a "customer" (from your perspective)
> said to you that they were special and you shouldn't charge them anything?
>
> A) you would ignore them, or B) you would give them a price. Either way
> it's your choice, at
I agree. Prioritizing VoIP is to provide a better quality phone call for
the user.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:17 AM Marco Coelho wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with prioritizing one type of service over another
> (VOIP vs FTP). It leads to a better quality of service for the end user.
> Where t
On December 16, 2017, "Vance Shipley" wrote:
> ... however if you agree that you'll save money on your upstream and want to
> install a shared cost, meet in the middle, peering with
> Netflix (Google, Amazon, Acme startup, ...) you've created a "fast lane" and
> are now the enemy of ignorant ne
Right.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Vance Shipley"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:21:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutr
It was my first time in studio, Was kind of fun
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
There
s://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --------------
> *From: *"Vance Shipley"
> *To: *"WISPA General List"
> *Sent: *Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:02:00 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
>
> &
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:02:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
"You" are an ISP of any size but think of the current context of a WISP. "They"
are some party who wants access to your network subscr
w.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNy
al List"
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 11:39:51 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
On Dec 16, 2017 22:53, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote:
They wanted paid peering and they got paid peering. NN didn't have any effect
on th
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
There is nothing wrong with prioritizing one type of service over another (VOIP
On Dec 16, 2017 22:53, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
They wanted paid peering and they got paid peering. NN didn't have any
effect on that. The FCC specifically said they didn't understand how all
that stuff works and didn't regulate
Sure they did. What would you do if a "customer" (from your perspecti
Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 11:26:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
Legally there is.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, O
Legally there is.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 16, 2017 12:17 PM, "Marco Coelho" wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with prioritizing one type of service over another
> (VOIP vs FTP). It leads to a better quality of service
y, December 16, 2017 11:17:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points
There is nothing wrong with prioritizing one type of service over another (VOIP
vs FTP). It leads to a better quality of service for the end user.
Where this was going sideways earlier was when the big IS
There is nothing wrong with prioritizing one type of service over another
(VOIP vs FTP). It leads to a better quality of service for the end user.
Where this was going sideways earlier was when the big ISP companies were
going to charge Netflix and Hulu directly if they wanted priority on their
ba
Yes but do you prioritize vonage over ooma???
-Sean
[Sent from mobile]
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 6:33 PM, James Wilson wrote:
>
> Don't we prioritize VoIP?
>
>> On Dec 15, 2017 4:04 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote:
>> This is fantastic.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-23
Don't we prioritize VoIP?
On Dec 15, 2017 4:04 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote:
> This is fantastic.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Dec 15, 2017 3:53 PM, "Mark Radabaugh" wrote:
>
This is fantastic.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 15, 2017 3:53 PM, "Mark Radabaugh" wrote:
> For your use, re-posted from last week:
>
>
> *Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet
> Freedom” *
>
>
For your use, re-posted from last week:
*Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet
Freedom” *
December 2017
*Overview for WISPA Members *
**
·These talking points are _not_ intended to be used proactively. WISPA
is not taking a proactive role in advocacy on this i
19 matches
Mail list logo
