27;
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:55
AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps -
was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
>You mention MadWifi driver has three
adaptive modulation methods. Do you know by any chance which one works best to
work with UDP traffic?
Given
age-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom DeReggiSent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 6:13 PMTo:
WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT:
about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Charles,
We have often found that to get adequate UDP
perform
age-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of John Tully
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $
6K
Charles,
Usually I don't reply to 'opinions' like this. But,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
Right or wrong, in the context of throughput efficiency, the
documentation I have seen regarding N-stream leads me to believe
that frame concatenation is the main method utilized by the
protocol. Would you care to expand/enlighten further (I am sure
the
other built-in nifty and useful
features?
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:45 PM
To:
't the same, MT's Nstreme adds a completely new layer, with "small
packet performance" being a major benefit, as other users commented. I
think Lonnie is on this list and can comment on the latest in StarOS/StarVX.
Best regards
Stephen
ot; being a major benefit, as other users commented. I think
Lonnie is on this list and can comment on the latest in StarOS/StarVX.
Best regards
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2006 00:49
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE:
Charles, I just wanted to make sure you disable connection tracking.
It is not required for a bridge or backhaul situation and you'll see a
few per cent better throughput.
Also, our routed performance exceeds the bridged throughput, so the
best is using routed without connection tracking.
Lonnie
fit, as other users commented. I think Lonnie is on this list and
can comment on the latest in StarOS/StarVX.
Best regards
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 June 2006 00:49
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subje
is
list and can comment on the latest in StarOS/StarVX.
Best
regards
Stephen
-Original Message-From: Charles Wu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 23 June 2006 00:49To: 'WISPA
General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT:
about
atures?
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:45 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subj
pen
to like it a lot
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tully
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for
Title: Message
Screenshot of NMS from full-speed lab testing,
83Mbps UDP traffic with ~20% CPU loadhttp://www.cablefreesolutions.com/radio/HPR%20lab%20testing%20UDP.pngScreenshot
of NMS from full-speed lab testing, 74Mbps TCP/IP traffic with ~20% CPU
loadhttp://www.cablefreesolutions.com/
ects
<http://www.cwlab.com/> http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:45 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for
om:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 6:16
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps -
was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Hi
Stephen,
Regarding performance gains, it is worth defining
what is meant by that term, as it c
st
Subject: Re: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $
6K
I only mentioned Mikrotik as its abilty to pass large packets has been
tested.
I believe we couldn't do that with StarOS as a limitation of Wifi clients
(although not positive, as I did not investigate WDS opti
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stephen PatrickSent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:45
PMTo: 'WISPA General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame
size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Hi there,
Not detracting from this great debate, but I'd have to make
some Mik
I am and always have been a StarOS fan. They came out on top when we where
initially tested various products 2 years ago and have been great since
however we had to revisited RouterOS recently when we noticed that the
majority of our traffic was 100 - 200 byte packets which was killing our WAR
base
Earl Comstock stated it best at ISPCON last year: The reason we are in
the mess we call telecom today is that 300 companies with an army of
lawyers and lobbyists spent $100's of millions to tell Congress & the
FCC to regulate them and not us.
Regulation generally does NOT work that way. You do
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
>While it may sound great to have a "double
standard law," it isn't realistic.
I disagree for several reasons.
Recent FCC trends have showed that there should NOT
be a double standard betwee
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
While it may sound great to have a "double standard
law," it isn't realistic. Recent FCC ruling trends tell us
that.
For years, telephone companies have been heavily
regulated while cable companies
>
> While they do an ok job w/ wireless, IMO, their strength is more the
> convenience coming from the integration of multiple packages and its
> flexibility rather than the performance of any single feature
>
> If you're looking at purely a "wireless" solution (in this "do-it-yourself"
> genre)
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
The secret of Net Neutrality is that there is no
harm in NOT HAVING NET NEutrality for under dog small providers. Market
pressures FORCE us to not unnecessisarilly block access. If we block, and
they want, they
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $
6K
Hi Tom,
Not to
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Nice one Jeff...
Absolutely right -
and our over-priced currency deserves some stick, not us (the people)
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Broadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2006 21
"I thought it worth chipping in - just my £0.01's worth."
Now that's harsh...the English Pence isn't worth 2 cents...yet.
Figuring it correctly:
"just my 1.0871p worth"
:-)
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
Hi there,
Not detracting from this great debate, but I'd have to make some Mikrotik comments at this point.
We use their OS in our radios and the "end product" we have on the market does out-perfo
r for many WISPs.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame si
Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $
6K
Are these figures in the
tAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:56 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $
6K
So I have more data for you
Are these figures in the lab? I have seen similar with a Mikrotik/N-Streme
solution.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: 16 June 2006 19:57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about
So I have more data for you Matt I just received about what firmware 4.0
delivers in terms of frame sizes and what it can mean to the business case.
Remember, this is multipoint, not PtP. All Mbps numbers are NET throughput:
Frame size Upstream Mbps/FPS Downstream Mbps/FPS
64
32 matches
Mail list logo
