Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an
unlicensed link for for less than $500 that will probably perform as
well as something costing $6000
]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an unlicensed link
for for less than $500 that will probably perform as well as something
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
$8000 is expensive
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile
link. Not sure if it will reach that far ...
Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love it,
but wanted to stay
02, 2011 8:36 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile
link. Not sure if it will reach that far ...
Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love
...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
24GHz @ 3 miles is not going to be stable unless is never rains
What about 5.4GHz? Moto PTP500 Lite will do 52Mbps now, and 105Mbps
] On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an
unlicensed link for for less than $500 that will probably perform as
well as something
@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile
link. Not sure if it will reach that far ...
Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love
At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=_000_D26588DB857E2948835D6C7A27C9879E15DBBD68AEROMAIL1aerone_
Both Radwin and Motorola PTP500 would work well under high
interference, but if you want to go to a whole diff band, I
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very
little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 8/2/2011 1:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type:
I think you just jinxed that link!
On 8/2/2011 2:32 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very
little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 8/2/2011 1:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At
On 2 August 2011 16:32, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com wrote:
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very
little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years.
Rain in the tropics and rain in the midwest are two *very* different things.
24ghz is unlicensed.
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 14:02:52 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul
, July 29, 2011 2:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
24ghz is unlicensed.
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 14:02:52 GMT
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Me
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 2:12 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
24ghz is unlicensed.
*Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless*
-Original message-
*From
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
I just assumed if you pay that much for a link it would be in the licensed
band. Still though, I can't imagine too
At 7/29/2011 02:38 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
I just assumed if you pay that much for a link it would be in the
licensed band. Still though, I can't imagine too many people using
the unlicensed 24 ghz band, It should be pretty clear, but if you
can't bgo bigger than a 2ft dish, I guess you are
I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly quickly and rain
fade will be a problem if you try to go too far. It would be good for short
hops, though. It still seems a bit pricey.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:
At 7/29/2011 02:38 PM,
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly quickly and rain fade
will be a problem if you try to go too far. It would be good for short hops,
though. It still seems a bit pricey.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:44
] *On
Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 2:58 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly quickly and rain
fade will be a problem if you try to go too far
: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
$8000 is expensive to me for an unlicensed frequency. For just a bit more you
can get licensed. If I'm getting out of the $100s range then I'll bite the
bullet and go all the way. The difference between $8000 and $12000 is not that
much if I have
] *On
Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
$8000 is expensive to me for an unlicensed frequency. For just a bit more
you can get licensed. If I'm getting out of the $100s
...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic
Crum
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
$8000 is expensive to me for an unlicensed frequency. For just a bit more
you can get licensed. If I'm getting out of the $100s range then I'll bite
What would you use to put together a 100Mbps FDX link for 500 bucks?
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul
, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an unlicensed
link for for less than $500 that will probably perform as well as something
costing $6000, and for another $500 I could have
OK, now just need to find 40MHz of spectrum. Oh wait, there isn't any
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
ARC panel and nv2 in 40mhz?
On Jul 29, 2011 6:48 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com
mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
What would you
] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
And I am told link is plane polarity so
...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things
...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
To: mailto:wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works
2' dishes
Matt Larsen
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 13:10:27 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4
Has anyone tried the SnapLink Blast?
http://www.wisptech.com/index.php/Microwave_Backhaul_Comparison_Chart
shows 24GHz, 160M half-duplex, $6k ... if it really works, that's pretty
good, in my book
On 7/26/2011 10:47 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
This question has probably been asked on this list
The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that will do
100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The price is the
same or cheaper.
I believe its 2 year warranty also.
-B-
On 7/27/2011 7:23 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
Has
9:50 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that will do
100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The price is the same
or cheaper.
I believe
: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
IIRC the Exalt unit is for Licensed Fiber Tower Freqs? No?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Street price is about $7500 with 1' antennas and 200 Mbps aggregate with power
supplies.
About a 4 week lead time.
But 3 non-overlapping channels is the best
On 7/27/2011 9:56 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Nice! Price
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses one polarity plane for
data...Not two.
-B-
On 7
: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
So no way for a 6 mile link even with 6 foot dishes? No idea what to put in a
path calc without knowing gains of dishes.
On Jul 27, 2011 10:09 PM, Bob Moldashel
lakel...@gbcx.netmailto:lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
Anything from 1' on up. It has same
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
IIRC the Exalt unit is for Licensed Fiber Tower Freqs? No?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Street price
...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec
]
*On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
** **
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses
: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Maybe it is. I am only going by word of mouth on that. That's why I said I
am told.. Don't want to put my foot in my mouth...
:-)
On 7/27/2011 10:11 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
That's weird, FCC regulations specify cross Pol... I think
-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more
This question has probably been asked on this list before ... if needed,
just tell me to check the archives ...
Becoming increasingly frustrated with chasing apparent interference
issues on our Alvarion Mikrotik 2.4GHz and 5.4 - 5.8GHz point to point
links, I am wondering if anyone has a
51 matches
Mail list logo
