s
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8
- Original Message -
From: "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
I do not believe you laying fiber is at all a bad sign to your customers.
You have been on the cutting e
5 15:29
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Ron Wallace wrote:
> That is exactly what I needed to hear, regarding the 2 OSs. Now a second
> Q, what is the difference between the WRAP and WAR boards? In the good ole
> USA these days, a WAR board may take on many def
Mark Nash wrote:
> What hardware is preferred to run the StarOS on? Most interested in the
> AP, but for CPE as well?
The neat thing about StarOS is that it's Linux-based, so it'll probably
run on just about any old computer you've got sitting in the closet. :D
If your traffic will stay under,
ROFLMAO>-Original Message->From: David E. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 10:29 AM>To: 'WISPA General List'>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?>>Ron Wallace wrote:>>> That is exactly what I needed to hear, regarding
Ron Wallace wrote:
> That is exactly what I needed to hear, regarding the 2 OSs. Now a second
> Q, what is the difference between the WRAP and WAR boards? In the good ole
> USA these days, a WAR board may take on many definitions. And since the
> CIA is monitoring e-mails I'm sure this will 'peak'
41-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Larsen - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
> I would echo Pauls sentiments, exactly.
>
> StarOS has been great for m
Thanks Paul, Crimbo?, you lot do speak a different version of the proper form of Language. However, I must admit that the British pint is a 'proper pint', especially where a 'proper pint of bitter' is concerned.
That is exactly what I needed to hear, regarding the 2 OSs. Now a second Q, what is
lace
*Sent:* 22 December 2005 23:11
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Paul,
Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to you and your family.
How would you compare StraOS/VX to Mikrotik RouterOS?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good
Backhaul?
Paul,
Merry
Christmas & Happy New Year to you and your family.
How would
you compare StraOS/VX to Mikrotik RouterOS?
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 03:52 PM
Paul,
Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to you and your family.
How would you compare StraOS/VX to Mikrotik RouterOS?>-Original Message->From: Paul Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 03:52 PM>To: ''WISPA General List''>
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: 22 December 2005 18:14
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Have you actually seen these speeds? I have never seen a Star OS
installation do more than about 17 meg aggregate. If you have seen this
then by all means please share the
Nstream2 on P4 should get you close to about 50Mbps FDX
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of John Scrivner
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:14 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
>
Have you actually seen these speeds? I have never seen a Star OS
installation do more than about 17 meg aggregate. If you have seen this
then by all means please share the details of the actual hardware used
and configuration if you do not mind.
Thank you,
Scriv
noc.kl.terranova.net wrote:
VIA with StarOS on 5.2/5.3 will get 100Mb. WAR board might do same. - cw
John Scrivner wrote:
I need some feedback from the collective. I am looking for a
backhaul radio link for my main tower. 5.8 Ghz is fully utilized at
this location. It is only a 1500 foot shot. I would like at least
50
I am seeing a future that is very much a mix of fiber, coax, wireless
and twisted pair. Somewhat like it is now. I think we will see some
ultra-high bandwidth roll-outs over all mediums that dwarf what we see
in most situations today. I do see an emerging gravitation toward fiber
/ wireless as
Money wise you may be right, not sure of the entire situation that john
is involved with.
But the focus today is on fiber. And how the community you serve
perceives your company is very important.
We talked about fiber in 2001 and today people still ask us when the
fiber is going to be deplo
, December 21, 2005 2:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Agreed, but if you can do it for 2 grand why spend 12? If the ebay
radios are reliable, then skip the fiber in my opinion. Might as well
take the 10 grand that is left over and install another 25 subs
Agreed, but if you can do it for 2 grand why spend 12? If the ebay
radios are reliable, then skip the fiber in my opinion. Might as well
take the 10 grand that is left over and install another 25 subs. ;)
George wrote:
I do not believe you laying fiber is at all a bad sign to your customer
I do not believe you laying fiber is at all a bad sign to your customers.
You have been on the cutting edge of technology with wireless, why would
you not do the fiber to continue on with your cutting edge technology
deployment.
It almost sounds like you believe wireless is better than fiber,
I would second that- you can usually find good quality ( stratex for
example ) used backhauls on ebay for around a few grand.
-
Jeff
On Dec 20, 2005, at 3:35 AM, G.Villarini wrote:
John ,
Youre best and cheap option here is a 38 ghz lic. Backhaul. For
around
$1000 or less you can buy th
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Who can do one for $10K?
However, isn't Proxim's gear 60 Ghz, right?
There is a big difference between the capabilties of 60Ghz vs 70Ghz of
Gigabeam.
60Ghz is effected much larger by Oxygen absorbion.
so...
60Ghz- reliable to half mile.
70Ghz - reliable to 2.5 miles.
Tom D
i
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
He can do a Proxim GigaLink
He can do a Proxim GigaLink for $10K. Fiber interface, 1.25Gb.
-B-
Tom DeReggi wrote:
For around $1000 a month I think you can get a 1 gbps wireless link
from Gigabeam, that would work for that distance I think.
Atlas has been working great for us, using 5.3 for that short
distance, you li
ces
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message - From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday,
60ghz
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
114 S. Walnut St.
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Anytime the budget allows it I run wires. Wireless is great but there's no
guarantee of service as it's unlicensed. Yes we can do a very good job by
buying good gear and being smart about the design etc. But.
Also, anytime you can use wires y
ubject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
On 12/20/05, Marlon K. Schafer (509)
982-2181 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A. OK. I've
watch for them some but never seen any actually show
up.I see you're going for one now! Good luck
bidding.Best,-- Dylan OliverPrimaveri
On 12/20/05, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A. OK. I've watch for them some but never seen any actually show up.
I see you're going for one now! Good luck bidding.
Best,-- Dylan OliverPrimaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubs
wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Se
"WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:24 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Ditto!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:36 AM
To: 'WISPA General List&#
(net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Cliff Leboeuf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:24 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Ditto!
-
Anytime the budget allows it I run wires. Wireless is great but there's no
guarantee of service as it's unlicensed. Yes we can do a very good job by
buying good gear and being smart about the design etc. But.
Also, anytime you can use wires you free up valuable spectrum for ptmp
systems
mber 20, 2005 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Hi,
We have used a Terabridge 5345 (now Proxim) and have been very happy.
45mbps full duplex, 10/100 ethernet, external antenna connectors, web
and snmp management, 2ms latency (even at full load), etc. The 5345
is 5.3ghz and the 5845
Ditto!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:36 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
John ,
Youre best and cheap option here is a 38 ghz lic. Backhaul. For ar
John ,
Youre best and cheap option here is a 38 ghz lic. Backhaul. For around
$1000 or less you can buy the whole DS3 link with antennas, youll need to
buy a pair of DS3 to Ethernet converters if you want Ethernet (around $1500
or less for the pair). The license lease is around $500 anually
Why not a laser?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:09 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject:[WISPA] Good Backhaul?
I need some feedback from the collective. I am looking for a ba
Likewise.. I've had good luck with atlas on 10 miles. 30 megabits
throughput. I have a spare pair for sale if you want them contact me
offline. I like the fact they have 5.2/5.4/5.7 - even though 5.4 isn't
entirely ready it'll do it, they say. Good luck
Tom DeReggi wrote:
For around $1000 a m
less Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Hi,
We have used a Terabridge 5345 (now Proxim) and have been very happy.
45mbp
For around $1000 a month I think you can get a 1 gbps wireless link from
Gigabeam, that would work for that distance I think.
Atlas has been working great for us, using 5.3 for that short distance, you
likely can get the full 54 mbps. We are getting about 36 mbps throughout for
a 14 mile link we
Hi,
We have used a Terabridge 5345 (now Proxim) and have been very happy.
45mbps full duplex, 10/100 ethernet, external antenna connectors, web
and snmp management, 2ms latency (even at full load), etc. The 5345 is
5.3ghz and the 5845 is 5.8ghz. The only issue will be the price... brand
new t
41 matches
Mail list logo
