Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-08 Thread Green, William C
We are seeing many of the congestion issues of 2.4GHz ameliorating themselves as clients are self-selecting 5GHz. Especially in the higher density environments where the 2.4GHz congestion was extreme. On our campus, 5GHz now represents 80% of the data transferred (up from 28% six years ago), a

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-08 Thread Jeffrey D. Sessler
roaming). Jeff From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" on behalf of Jake Snyder Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Date: Monday, March 6, 2017 at 6:20 PM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 One thing I like i

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Danny Eaton
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 Also, I think saying that students "save $30 on the laptop buying it with just the 2.4 radio" implies an unrealistic degree of involvement in the technical aspects of buying a new computer. If people thought this way, I think we would see th

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Hunter Fuller
t; *Sent:* Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:20 AM > > > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 > > > > I see so many IoT devices that are 2.4 only; as well as the students save > $30 on the laptop buying it with just the 2.4 radio (but it’s

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Wyatt Schill
: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 I see so many IoT devices that are 2.4 only; as well as the students save $30 on the laptop buying it with just the 2.4 radio (but it’s 802.11n!) that many of them come that way as well. We’re testing a “Rice Owls” (dual band) and a “Rice Owls 5 GHz” (uhm, 5 GHz

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Ian Lyons
Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hunter Fuller Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 10:45 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 Yes, we are attempting this strategy, but so far the rejoicing has been more limited than

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Danny Eaton
areas, and so far, the results are positive. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Coehoorn, Joel Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 10:45 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Hunter Fuller
Monday, March 6, 2017 9:20:11 PM > > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 > One thing I like in your design is the 5GHz only and dual band. So many > people try a 5GHz only and a 2.4Ghz only and it backfires on them. > > > >

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Ian Lyons
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 One thing I like in your design is the 5GHz only and dual band. So many people try a 5GHz only and a 2.4Ghz only and it backfires on them. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Jason Cook mailto:jason.c...@adelaide.edu.au>> wrote: W

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Jake Snyder
Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 > Ph: +61 8 8313 4800 > > From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Casey Feskens > Sent: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 4:58 AM > To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > Subje

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Jason Cook
stituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Casey Feskens Sent: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 4:58 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 We are currently using a 5GHz only SSID (as well as 2.4) and have been trying to encourage

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Casey Feskens
gt;> *Reply-To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" > EDUCAUSE.EDU> >> *Date: *Monday, March 6, 2017 at 8:42 AM >> *To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" > EDUCAUSE.EDU> >> *Subject: *[WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 >> >> >>

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Hunter Fuller
arch 6, 2017 at 8:42 AM > *To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" < > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> > *Subject: *[WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 > > > > Folks, just wondering how many PSI’s have successfully turned off your 2.4 > and gone 5GHz only? An

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Jeffrey D. Sessler
for “in flight” devices. Jeff From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" on behalf of "Oliver, Jeff" Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Date: Monday, March 6, 2017 at 8:42 AM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Subject: [WIRELESS-

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-06 Thread Coehoorn, Joel
We still have a lot of devices (especially low-end smartphones) that only have 2.4 radios. Joel Coehoorn Director of Information Technology 402.363.5603 *jcoeho...@york.edu * *Please contact helpd...@york.edu for technical assistance.* The mission of York College is to transform lives throug