witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic
news)
I would say that to use those statistic to prove that you need only code
for IE is dangerous, as there is a much higher showing, right across the
board, of existing NS browsers and Other browser users
Title: RE: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic news)
:) That'a boy James.
Henning Sittler
www.inscriber.com
-Original Message-
From: James Macfarlane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango
(grin).
- James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Garth Penglase
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic
news)
I
]
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:36 AM
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic news)
I have a retail site with over 600,000 visitors a month. The stats are
about the same.
We're thinking on a surcharge
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Macfarlane
Sent: June 14, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic
news)
I have a retail site with over 600,000 visitors a month. The stats are
about
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic
news)
I would say that to use those statistic to prove that you need only code
for IE is dangerous, as there is a much higher showing, right across the
board, of existing NS
Uhisn't Flash a monopoly unto itself?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roland Dumas
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off
Hi Steve,
Please see my replies below
- Original Message -
From: Steve Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:51 AM
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic news)
I got
Clean designs are cross platform and cross browser compatible. Complex UI
designs can now be addressed by Flash, which is very cross platform
consistent. As users of a non-MS tool, many of us on non-MS platforms, we
need to keep focused on the principle of keeping the market open to
innovation
I agree with both sides of this argument. I would, being a Macintosh user and a
Libran...
But is it the developer's job to decide what platforms a solution is built for? That
should be dictated by the client, based on cost and audience
And I think it's at that point that developers should
Most Netscape problems I have seen are the result of bad coding, such
as leaving out table tags. Shouldn't we code correctly? I first test in
Netscape. If it works there it almost always works in IE. The vast
majority of sites don't have any functions that can't work in both
browsers, it just
: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic
news)
I agree with both sides of this argument. I would, being a Macintosh
user and a Libran...
But is it the developer's job to decide what platforms
Of Nicholas Froome
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic
news)
I agree with both sides of this argument. I would, being a Macintosh
user and a Libran...
But is it the developer's job
Title: RE: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic news)
This is only an opinion, since we're on the topic again:
It's not so much about having different browsers. They should all interpret the same code or mark up in a predictable manor. It doesn't need to be exactly
Title: RE: Witango-Talk: IE browser share now 93% in 2002 (Off topic news)
We all have good opinions on this, and I
have read all of this thread with great interest.
I wasnt going to comment again on
this thread, but Henning has eloquently brought the real issue to light.
It doesn't
I found this interesting for those worried about how much to code for
netscape (Mozilla).
This from the Associated Press :
Microsoft's Internet Explorer now has a global usage share among browsers
of 93 percent, up from 87 percent last year and 67 percent in 1999,
according to WebSideStory's
I would say that to use those statistic to prove that you need only code
for IE is dangerous, as there is a much higher showing, right across the
board, of existing NS browsers and Other browser users, on the web sites
that I control. And nothing stays the same for too long in tech anyway.
I would say that to use those statistic to prove that you need only
code for IE is dangerous, as there is a much higher showing, right
across the board, of existing NS browsers and Other browser users,
on the web sites that I control. And nothing stays the same for too
long in tech anyway.
From the OnlyTOYS.com website stats:
Netscape 6.70% - MSIE 92.71% - Other 0.56%
However, we agree with Garth. Coding for IE only would be a mistake.
Stephen
I would say that to use those statistic to prove that you need only code
for IE is dangerous, as there is a much higher showing, right
19 matches
Mail list logo
