Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG and WPKG-GP

2010-06-25 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
On 06/25/2010 11:43 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote: On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lukasz Zalewski wrote: Hi Stanislav, On 24/06/2010 06:59, Stanislav Zhelyazkov wrote: . I am sorry if my question is a bit stupid but I just cannot understand it from the installation guide. And my last final

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG and WPKG-GP

2010-06-24 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi Stanislav, On 24/06/2010 06:59, Stanislav Zhelyazkov wrote: Yes we have samba 3 domain and we are just starting to implement windows 7 in our organization. I like the WPKG client but it doesn't display to the user what is doing. Some installations like MS office are taking a lot of time and

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG and WPKG-GP

2010-06-23 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
On 22/06/2010 14:49, Stanislav Zhelyazkov wrote: Is there a way to deploy WPKG-GP trough WPKG client? I want to deploy it silently and to set all setting from http://code.google.com/p/wpkg-gp/wiki/InstallationGuide maybe trough registry. Is it possible WPKG client and WPKG-GP to work together?

Re: [wpkg-users] Excluding particular OS and architecture types from patch application

2010-04-28 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
"Rainer Meier" wrote: Hi Rainer >Hi Lukasz, > >On 28.04.2010 18:24, Lukasz Zalewski wrote: >> Would you consider reviewing/accepting a patch if i was going to submit >> one? > >Well, currently I fear that I will not have time to review it. Moreover there &

Re: [wpkg-users] Excluding particular OS and architecture types from patch application

2010-04-28 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
But i consider XML a more ''self documenting'' format, and really i hate CMD scripting that turn in really unreadable pieces of code. Apart that in XML there's a finer error handling, put every command in a statement... Clerarly, it's my opinion. ;-) I Second this :) -

Re: [wpkg-users] Excluding particular OS and architecture types from patch application

2010-04-28 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
On 28/04/2010 16:38, Rainer Meier wrote: Hi, On 28.04.2010 17:06, Marco Gaiarin wrote: If this is a contest i definitely vote for a os='' and arch='' tag in nodes ( I will definitely think about such a feature - or something similar. But I will not include such a thing on short notice. Rainer

Re: [wpkg-users] Excluding particular OS and architecture types from patch application

2010-04-28 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
On 28/04/2010 13:59, Rainer Meier wrote: Hi Lukas, Hi Rainer, On 28.04.2010 14:00, Lukasz Zalewski wrote: I was wondering if it would be possible to add an option to package definition which will apply a patch to only particular OS version(s) ignoring others, i.e. applying patches to XP

[wpkg-users] Excluding particular OS and architecture types from patch application

2010-04-28 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi All, This is a feature request, but i would be grateful for any workarounds to the current setup I was wondering if it would be possible to add an option to package definition which will apply a patch to only particular OS version(s) ignoring others, i.e. applying patches to XP only, or W

Re: [wpkg-users] Joining windows to a domain

2010-03-17 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
On 08/03/2010 21:33, Sebastian Mazur wrote: I used server IP addres instead of using \\server_name\wpkg Now it works. Thanx! Another option would be to create a cname for your server_name, e.g. wpkg_server_name pointing to your server_name (and maybe a netbios alias) and refer to that in your

Re: [wpkg-users] Computer account

2009-11-19 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
le dahut wrote: Hello, I'm testing WPKG 1.1.2 with WPKG Client 1.3.9. The file server is a Samba PDC. In the "Path, user" tab I've check "Use computer account and password". When I run in a command line 'net start wpkgservice' it fails with error 3534 "The service did not report an error."

Re: [wpkg-users] Testing updates

2009-10-22 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Pendl Stefan wrote: Hi all, What is the best way to thes updates to the already deployed packages? We have quite few packages at the top level of profiles hierarchy (covering nearly all of the machines). Remving package from there and putting it in the test profile would be disasterous. What i ha

Re: [wpkg-users] First time installation of WPKG

2009-10-21 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
ycdwbycid wrote: I checked the events log and you might have got me there... WNetAddConnection2-> A specified logon session does not exist. It may already have been terminated. 16/10/2009 12:15:18WpkgService Error None1 N/A ZEUS-DT WNetAddConnection2-> A specifi

[wpkg-users] Testing updates

2009-10-21 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi all, What is the best way to thes updates to the already deployed packages? We have quite few packages at the top level of profiles hierarchy (covering nearly all of the machines). Remving package from there and putting it in the test profile would be disasterous. What i have been doing so fa

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG service + wired 802.1x authentication

2009-10-19 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Jason Oster wrote: Hi all, After a quick search, I've seen mention that the service cannot be used when 802.1x authentication is in use on the network. The only workaround given was setting up the service to run with the task scheduler. My problem with this workaround is that some of my pack

[wpkg-users] AutoIt and wpkg

2009-10-15 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi all, Has anyone had any experience/success with running AutoIt scripts with wpkg update. Is it possible? I have few packages that can't install silently without simulated point and click. Many Thanks Luk - wpkg-users m

[wpkg-users] Installation/upgrade of same package on different architectures

2009-09-23 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi, Im trying to figure out how to update same package on different OS architectures (i.e. x86 and x64), for example tortoise svn. Creating two package profiles probably would not work as one (for the wrong architecture) would be installed and the right one updated. I guess you can fiddle with

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange behaviour when selecting hosts

2009-08-23 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Rainer Meier wrote: Hi Lukasz, Lukasz Zalewski wrote: Hi! I have the following hosts.xml file: when the script is run on ityyy student profile is always selected (match is found on 138.37.94.+). As the documentation states that the hosts are processed top to bottom (with

Re: [wpkg-users] wpkgCreateReport Update

2009-08-22 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Malte Starostik wrote: Hello Mark, Am Freitag, 21. August 2009 20:44:03 schrieb Mark Nienberg: grubi wrote: Download and user manual can be found at: http://www.gig-mbh.de/edv/software/wpkgtools/wpkg-create-report-english.h tm The user manual says: "The prerequisite is that you have copied t

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange behaviour when selecting hosts

2009-08-20 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Lukasz Zalewski wrote: Hi! I have the following hosts.xml file: when the script is run on ityyy student profile is always selected (match is found on 138.37.94.+). As the documentation states that the hosts are processed top to bottom (with the exeptions of non reg

Re: [wpkg-users] profile dependency not honoured wrt applications

2009-08-20 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Malte Starostik wrote: Hi Lukasz, Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 15:05:22 schrieb Lukasz Zalewski: Hi all, I'm using latest stable release of wpkg (WPKG 1.1.1) and latest stable client release (WPKG Client 1.2.1) I have the following profile entries: default.xml a

[wpkg-users] profile dependency not honoured wrt applications

2009-08-20 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi all, I'm using latest stable release of wpkg (WPKG 1.1.1) and latest stable client release (WPKG Client 1.2.1) I have the following profile entries: default.xml and in student.xml According t

Re: [wpkg-users] package upgrade scenario

2009-08-19 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Robin Roevens wrote: Hi Lukasz A package update is indeed done by _not_changing the id (or creating another package with diferent id) but by changing the revision. And the install and upgrade command's if needed. In the firefox case this would be and to make firefox update

[wpkg-users] package upgrade scenario

2009-08-18 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi all, I'm sure this topic has been mentioned few times in the past (i have found a previous thread entitled Basic Question), but it is still unclear to me how the update process should commence. So as an example i have a firefox package defined as follows: package id="firefox3501" name

[wpkg-users] Strange behaviour when selecting hosts

2009-08-18 Thread Lukasz Zalewski
Hi! I have the following hosts.xml file: when the script is run on ityyy student profile is always selected (match is found on 138.37.94.+). As the documentation states that the hosts are processed top to bottom (with the exeptions of non reg expressions) the allaccess woul