G'day
I have been working on upgradeing http://choroideremia.org to web
standards. When I use FireFox 1.01 to go to http://choroideremia.org ,
my PC crashes and all I can do is a cold boot. Anyone know why?
I won't visit the site with Firefox as I'm not interested in
crashing my PC. However, I
Angus,
I didn't have any trouble with that page using FF1.0.1.
There are several malformed or missing s and s in your html but I
wouldn't expect that to cause your PC to crash. Maybe something else is
going on. You might check the Firefox general forum at
http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php
Pardon me for continuing this off-topicness, but this just caught my
attention BIG TIME.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:12:54 +, Patrick H. Lauke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, thank you for the usual Chewbacca defense...when a discussion on
> standards doesn't go the way you like, just point the va
Douglas Clifton wrote:
Perhaps you spend a little more time with syntax and a little
less time spouting about perfect "semantic" markup.
I'll spend my time however I please, thank you for your concern.
URI: http://www.salford.ac.uk/
"This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!"
http://shop.salford.ac.
designer wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a bug in Firefox (I think it is, anyway) which shows itself as a
2-3 pixel gap appearing in the bottom border of an image when the viewport
is altered by scrolling with the mouse wheel. It doesn't affect all the
images (strange) only some, and the image must be outs
Hi,
I currently use php content negotiation and found the following article
very informative and the script digestable:
(http://loadaveragezero.com/vnav/labs/PHP/DOCTYPE.php)
C
PS
Collin, Happy Birthday
On Friday, March 25, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Collin Davis wrote:
Carol,
For one thing, as Patrick
Thanks Martin - that looks intriguing! Leave it with me and I'll attach the
'proper' menu and see how it all looks.
Thanks too for all the other advice/help from you folks.
Bob McClelland,
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: "Martin J. Lambert" <[EM
Carol,
For one thing, as Patrick put it so well:
[quote]
I was suggesting that simply saying "the W3C use it on their site" is not an
argument that holds too much weight.
[/quote]
Also, per the terminology defined by RFC 2119, none of the terms used for
specifying MIME types are anything more tha
Patrick,
Perhaps you spend a little more time with syntax and a little
less time spouting about perfect "semantic" markup.
Personally, I could care less about sending XHTML 1.0 to IE
as text/html. Or sending self-closing element tags either. It's
a borked browser on so many fronts to begin with a
designer wrote:
> So I've done some fiddling with overflow : auto, and failed.
>
> OK, maybe I'm missing a trick here (do please tell me!) but if not,
> it looks as though this solution isn't one, after all.
I've never had a lot of success with that overflow idea either.
The other way to go at i
G'day
Vaska.WSG wrote:
What about...I can't find it right now...there's a tutorial out there
about creating frameless frames using css...it might be a better
solution then you can have your nav on the left and when you scroll it
won't move...just your right side content will scroll...v
I know
Collin,
Then why would W3C use it on their own site? This is the first 4 lines
of their source code for their home page:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US">
http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#";>
I'm not being argume
Hi
Thread closed, no more please. Keep your gripes off the list.
Thanks
WSG admin
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:56:16 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry. Your Highness.
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribing
The list administrators reserve the right t
> Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
>
>> Is there any situation where IE6 renders in standard compliance mode
>> with the preamble?
>>
Juergen Auer responded:
>
> If IE6 finds an Xml-Declaration, he switchs in BackCompat.
>
If my understanding is correct, then this should be phrased somewhat
differen
Check this out...not sure if it's what you want, but I found an article
about it for you...
http://www.stunicholls.myby.co.uk/layouts/frame.html
Doesn't work in IE5 but I think if you dig around enough you could find
somebody who has solved this problem...
good luck...v
On Mar 25, 2005, at 1:
Javascript...calculate the height of the window or even a particular
div (like the one that the overflow is inside of)...and then apply
height to the div in question (based upon the calculated heights of
things minus some amount perhaps)...not the most elegant way to things
however...
What
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:57 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] XHTML 1.1 Presentation Module
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
> Here's how xhtml2.0 defines the text module wh
Happy Easter to all!
So I've done some fiddling with overflow : auto, and failed. My problem is
(as far as I can see) that one has to specify a height for the div which has
overflow:auto, and I don't know how to set the height to fill the viewport
space under the menu. Normally I'd set it to 100%,
Nice. We're currently in a prototype stage so I won't really think about the final solution until next week (but I'm downloading your markups right now).
Thanks very much, vaska
On Mar 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Andrew Hawthorne wrote:
Hi Vaska,
I think I may have a solution for you -- negative m
Thanks Peter,
A jpg of what I'm seeing can be found at:
http://www.marscovista.fsnet.co.uk/firefox.jpg
(Win XP pro (not SP2) - Matrox card and up to date driver :- )
Bob McClelland,
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Farrell" <[EMAIL PRO
Thanks Thierry,
Your article on frames is the best I've read! An excellent resource, now
bookmarked!
To the other guys who responded: I've had a quick play with overflow : auto,
but couldn't seem to avoid two RH scrollbars! I'm going to look (properly)
over Easter . . .
Thanks,
Bob McClellan
21 matches
Mail list logo