> The problem is that when the browser window is reduced in
> size, to the point that the table can no longer shrink to fit
> inside the available space, the table (but not the whole
> right div) drops down so that the top of the table is in line
> with the bottom of the left navigation div. This
Hi,
thank you for your thoughts and feedback.
> After all, the few people that do spend any time at all on making their
> websites accessible,
> probably aren't going to be experts in accessibility, so probably won't do a
> very good job of it.
Yes and no. If we had no pioneers which inhere
Thanks Joseph, but I don't know the width however. The right width column
varies according to the width of the browser and it's content.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Taylor
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Ri
IE6 will drop your content down to a place where it'll fit.
You need to do something like this:
my_container {
min-width: XXpx;
_width: XXpx; /* just for IE6 */
}
IE6 needs specified width and then it'll behave like it was given a
min-width.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Designer / Developer/
--
I have two divs as follows (no link sorry, web page is protected) - a left
div for navigation, a right div containing a header and table (with tabular
data).
The problem is that when the browser window is reduced in size, to the point
that the table can no longer shrink to fit inside the avail
Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
Hi all,
I believe making sites accessible is very important.
We are all used to ramps near stairs, lifts near escalators, lowered
curbs at intersections. We need to get used to "baking in" time into
our projects for accessible elements.
[...]
I agree wholeheartedly. T
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
> On Behalf Of Craig Henneberry
> Sent: Friday, 26 June 2009 1:46 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: RE: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account
>
> Andrew Stewart wrote:
>
> >Most p
At 6/30/2009 01:41 AM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
> I like to think that this is where web
> development should begin, with JavaScript added to enhance, not to
> provide core functionality.
Why?
Most modern accessibility aids (eg: font increase, JAWS, etc) use an
existing browser, which can handl
> >I found that some of these elements take quite some time to
> >integrate. Creating high-contrast CSS can take up to a day (or more
> >if you're new to it), non-Javascript states usually more than an
> >hour because you also have to edit the script.
> By "non-Javascript states" do you mean t
At 6/29/2009 11:46 PM, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
I found that some of these elements take quite some time to
integrate. Creating high-contrast CSS can take up to a day (or more
if you're new to it), non-Javascript states usually more than an
hour because you also have to edit the script.
By "non-
On 30 Jun 2009, at 16:46, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
For an example of a high-contrast version may I suggest to check out
the Sydney Morning Herald's Travel section (http://www.smh.com.au/travel/
). Click on "Low vision" in the navigation bar (We're going to
replace "low vision" with "high contra
I think it is pretty good.
But one slight irony/anomaly - the 'low vision' link is in pretty
small font. Took me a while to find it... time for new
glasses prescription
jim
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Jens-Uwe
Korff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I believe making sites accessible is very important.
12 matches
Mail list logo
