macs can run windows fonts as well. There may be conflicts though if
you run the same font from both os's simultaneously though.
but loading fonts can be a resource burden as they all load into RAM
at startup. I recommend the excellent and free Linotype http://www.linotype.com/fontexplorerX
F
standards compliance should not be confused with WCAG conformance.
HTML is a standard WCAG is a guidance that people use as if it were a
"standard", which could easily be a standard but is effectively not
one. However, complying with WCAG confers added benefits which
standards compliance cr
buying a mailing list that
requires root access.
Joe
On 12/11/2008, at 11:41 AM, Graphics & Web Designing, LLC wrote:
I am sorry to ask this question but I am very curious as to how
others feel about this.
I have a client that is purchasing E-mail listings from a company
called exp
there is no
such thing as 'rollover' in JavaScript.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: 08 November 2008 03:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] li hover bg "preloader"
*SIGH*
On 08/11/2008, at 7:54 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I am away on leave returning on Monday, 10 November 2008, if you
have a
request for Customs web admin please send it to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
Nathan
Nathan Franklin
Web Admin | IT Applications | Australi
you mean on hover (i.e.: a:hover) not on rollover (that's javaScript),
don't you?
Pedantic Joe
On 07/11/2008, at 12:49 PM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
ah yes i had forgotten about that, thanks.
Henrik Madsen wrote:
I have done this previously:
Have 1 background image and change it
wouldn't have been able to participate in this discussion.
I believe in stopping the waste at source (conservation) over trying
to fix it further down the line (recycling) as it is less work and a
lighter load that way.
joe
On 06/11/2008, at 8:55 AM, Chris Vickery wrote:
If you
Of course OOOR notices are important but it is a trivial matter to set
a list of addresses or domains this notice does not affect OR to send
the OOOR to each email address only once in a week, so the sender
knows you're out but does not have to receive your notice everyday.
Joe
On
this would be a useful and important addition to the mailing
guidelines I would have to say, yes.
Joe
On 06/11/2008, at 8:47 AM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Oh. I have always just set mine up to not send out for specific e-
mail addresses. Sorry, did not mean to exasperate the issue. I did
not
agree it is disconcerting.
Joe
On 06/11/2008, at 8:20 AM, David Fuller :: magickweb wrote:
Brett
While I agree they can be annoying, they are quite a useful thing
for normal circumstances.
They are generally set up by the person who owns the email address
(sometimes by their network
yes, good point.
I was making a subtle stab at the .htm versus .html discussion in here
recently.
but given my 'druthers, yes, I'd personally drop all file extensions
in URLs completely if I could.
Joe
On 05/11/2008, at 4:04 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
th
really for the final page, which should
not bury a full product list so deeply and should be titled /
product_list.html anyway.
BAD IA IMHO
Joe
OK, in marketing terms you can easily create your own TinyURL by
redirecting vimportant traffic through a rewrite.
On 05/11/2008, at 12:40 PM
I said no direct reason, but you point is a good reason to consider
short URLs but this is not always possible, but yes, typablity is a
good thing too.
On 05/11/2008, at 11:27 AM, silky wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Joe Ortenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
other than making
other than making sense and having a strong connection with the page
the content is on, there is no direct reason, other than being a bit
sensible about it, I wouldn't advise testing out the 2048 characters.
On 05/11/2008, at 9:32 AM, James Ellis wrote:
RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1) doesn't set a ma
chnology they request but
to dig deeper into their business goals and resources and aims for the
site, step back and analyse their needs, then return with a best fit
for their time, aims, strategy and budget.
Joe
On 04/11/2008, at 1:02 AM, Susan Grossman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008
want Contribute
and, upon discovering those needs, either continue with Contribute or
offer a solution that meets their needs better, should that be the
case, but it is the needs of the project that need to be discovered
first, I'd have thought.
Joe
On 03/11/2008, at 12:21 AM, Tod
Bless you Dave, much more patience than I had, I can tell you.
These are all spot on.
Joe
On 03/11/2008, at 9:35 AM, Dave Lane wrote:
Hello Mark,
Mark Harris wrote:
Dave, the business decision is not that of the web designer. While
web
design may be his business, it's not the busine
clutch", "shift gears at a lower rev
to save petrol", "let the engine warm for a few moments before giving
it a load", are all things you pay your mechanic good money for so
your car runs better for longer, the expert advice he is good for.
Mark, you misread both my
t, and one proposing Contribute
already has this in mind. It is up to we professionals to show them an
option that goes towards their own content supply, but in a more
integrated fashion than Contribute can manage.
Joe
On 02/11/2008, at 4:43 PM, Mark Harris wrote:
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
Contribute
and their money is better served by getting a simple CMS
deployed that meets with their scope and strategy and will be easier
to manage for everyone, client included.
joe
On 02/11/2008, at 12:53 AM, James Farrell wrote:
Hi Guys,
A client wants to use Adobe Contribute for content mana
lly-sticky-sidebar
http://www.nowcss.com/javascript/emulating-position-fixed-in-ie-6-below
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Joe
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May I suggest that we "fix" an "Up" link at the bottom and a series
ge into smaller pages is the simplest way
out, but for our application, the page has to contain all the
information on the same page.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Joe
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandard
beer (or wine
or juice)
This will be my penultimate event in London before I join the Sydney
crew in September so it would be great to get as many of you as
possible around. Thanks.
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.typingthevoid.com
www.joi
guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.typingthevoid.com
www.joiz.com
*
Ultimately, if the server is configured right, it shouldn't matter,
but standardistas are sticklers for detail./
feel able to reveal the vendor name?
Curious Joe
On Jun 19 2008, at 18:08, Rob Enslin wrote:
Many thanks for all the input.
Now for the fun part... go back to the CMS v
rent, but
remain essentially unchanged for the last decade at least.
So, to reiterate, any MA course should provide the tools to "fish"
rather than the fish itself and should not allow itself to be
providing significant am amounts of training in concepts that will
easily age.
Joe
popouts. If your architecture is clear and obvious, and
you have plenty of clear pointers to the content sections, the popout
subnav becomes less necessary.
On Jun 6 2008, at 16:18, Darren West wrote:
Joe said:
Therefore if javascript is off, any descended subnav should
display in it&#
o no need to go to far
into it.
joe
On Jun 6 2008, at 15:47, Rachel Radford wrote:
It sounds like a lot of work for something that you are purely
guessing?
As your audience is already part of the community that you're doing
the website for, it should be easy to find out a typ
for things they need to know more about, and less likely to get
stuck in a conceptual rut.
Joe
On May 30 2008, at 22:39, James Jeffery wrote:
Only problem with the Lynda.com DVDs is sometimes they can be
outdated.
Although, this one is £50 and looks good. I might actually buy
this, i
subscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED
ntext.
Joe
On May 16 2008, at 16:32, Ian Chamberlain wrote:
Fingers crossed this is not too far off topic; being a newby to
PHP; any
clues where I can find how-to's, snippets, libraries or even
application
suites built from PHP that are built to a good minimum standard
please.
I a
Once again the Web Standards Meetup London group is gathering at
Lloyds bar in Clerkenwell on Monday May 12th at 7pm.
Full details at:
http://webstandards.meetup.com/130/calendar/7700441/
Please RSVP if you can make it, thanks!
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.typingthevoid.com
www.joiz.com
e bar... (Anyone notice the
irony of having a meting about digital publishing in a former print
works? ;-) ) but otherwise at one of the tables to the right of the
bar, in one of the nooks. I'll be the baldy with the macBook and a
picture of a wasp!.
Thanks for your attention.
Joe Orte
elines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidel
.info
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Joe
Please clarify dwain.
have you got two examples, one shrink-wrapping (??) the other not?
Do you mean one div will only be as large as the content within it
and the other will retain a fixed size regardless of content?
Joe
On Mar 27 2008, at 05:07, dwain wrote:
after my experience tonight
http://webstandards.meetup.com/130/
RSVP on the meetup page if you're interested. Thanks.
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubsc
talled and
templated, can provide compliant code.
You could even find a way to create something bespoke (my personal
preference) using a framework or some good coders.
Joe
On Mar 1 2008, at 22:08, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
Hi all
I'm working to replace a horribly non-compliant
and reply off-list if
you encounter a problem?
http://allturf.sitesbyjoe.com/
Thanks!
--
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Designer / Developer
------
Sites by Joe, LLC
"Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design"
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Fax: (866) 301-8045
Web: http://
point taken Russ.
Do you feel this thread (implementation of JS in datagenerator site)
is on topic?
Joe
On Feb 23 2008, at 13:55, russ - maxdesign wrote:
Gary was having a bad day. He's now left the list.
Don’t take his comments personally, anyone!
Let’s all calm down and focus o
Looks to me like Gary was talking to all of us, or do I understand
_list_ differently to others?
Joe
On Feb 23 2008, at 06:52, dwain wrote:
my misunderstanding.
dwain
On 2/23/08, Gary Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wasn't talking to you dwain.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:3
standards compliance, _some_ of the
time, or in all that we do?
Joe
On Feb 23 2008, at 06:04, Gary Menzel wrote:
I wasn't talking to you dwain.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 3:39 PM, dwain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
target had something that just works and look what happened to
t
you mean "Dont make ME think", right? ;-)
you made me think about it...
;-)
On Feb 19 2008, at 07:29, Thomas Thomassen wrote:
"Don't make the think -- A Common Sence Approach to Web Usability"
by Steve Krug
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAI
bscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
U
Dwain, Matt
Sorry forgot to mention I also getfilesize in php for reasons Dwain
mentioned and I have created simple functions like the one he
mentions, with a pool of file icons to display with. Sorry for not
mentioning these.
Joe
On Feb 17 2008, at 00:27, Matt Fellows wrote:
As Joe
ry of text content you want to allow the
recipient to edit, or easily copy into another text editing application.
In this instance I make sure the word doc is as simple as possible,
and is minimally formatted, preferably as an rtf.
Joe
On Feb 15 2008, at 13:10, kevin.erickson wrote:
Hi,
Can
n the desire to hold to standards, conflicts arise
in the creation of code, so we DO have to occasionally debug in order
to solve, don't we?
Joe
On Feb 15 2008, at 11:52, Matt Fellows wrote:
With no offense intended to the list moderators, I feel the
usefulness of this maili
sgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guid
This is a much better and interesting description of web 2.0.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE
if less technical...
Joe
On Feb 12 2008, at 13:14, russ - maxdesign wrote:
Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions
of web 2.0:
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a
sible.
There's nothing stopping us from:
id ="form element_1"
id ="form element_2"
id ="form element_3"
if we need to order elements. Or have I missed something?
Joe
On Feb 8 2008, at 07:30, Chris Knowles wrote:
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
I would have thought so.
IE - I have
one with 5.5, one with 6, one with 7, another with office 97, all
with antispam/spybot software.)
Seems like no contest to me...
Joe
On Feb 8 2008, at 06:20, James Ellis wrote:
and remember that Wine is an emulation layer, it may not give
the same
results as virtualising
nes.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://w
quality of a label/input group by designating it a block
element, and then group several form elements, or even each label
input group with fieldsets?
BTW: is the equivalent of a force carriage return and thus
belongs within paragraphs, i thought!
Joe
On Feb 7 2008, at 19:55, Алексей Новиков
we should use that one within forms,
I would have thought.
Joe
On Feb 7 2008, at 16:05, Thomas Thomassen wrote:
Fieldsets and Labels is present in HTML4 as well. Don't see
anything new about that. Still need some extra elements to organise
them. Such as lists.
- Original
lines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joi
Has anyone looked up the HTML 5 pages on form elements?
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#forms
It's all fieldsets and labels... which makes more semantic sense than
paragraphs, lists, and dd/dl
JOe
On Feb 6 2008, at 04:06, Steve Green wrote:
There m
that we could all find useful in our bookmarks list.
give it a whirl!
http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
Joe
On Feb 6 2008, at 02:10, Michael Horowitz wrote:
I've noticed that my site is centered it ie 7.0 but left justified
in firefox http://terrorfreeamerica.us/. What are the issue
end tag, like,
, and , so you close the tag internally, with a space
slash, like so: and the input example above.
Hope this helps!
BTW: I notice you posted a comment that you got it working in FF but
it doesn't work for me here, unless I got the link wrong?
Joe
On Feb 3 2008, at
ist Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PRO
PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
no probs. just trying to help.
On Jan 27 2008, at 01:05, Christian Snodgrass wrote:
Yes I do, it's not finished yet.
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
Christian.
Did you know most of your portfolio goes to a 404?
On Jan 24 2008, at 16:06, Christian Snodgrass wrote:
Hello,
I have a small sem
EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
;root" instance of XP and start fresh with a virgin instance...
Not bad for less than £150 and a days work setting up and locking it
down!
Joe
On Jan 25 2008, at 06:08, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hi,
Whats my cheapest option for getting ie7 to run on my intel based mac.
Is it basically an opti
Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
You'd be surprised (maybe not!) as to how few people know about tab
and new windows and use them for this purpose.
I really have to push people in our studio to use these.
Joe
On Jan 19 2008, at 12:11, George S. Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 04:38, Designer wrote:
I use this
That's not *fixing* the back button and is a consequence of the AJAX
refresh JS instead. It is the JS that needs to be fixed....
joe
On Jan 19 2008, at 17:43, Michael MD wrote:
Are we agreed that the back button *should* take one to the
previous page?
yep .. speaking of which...
Is
this particular standard?
I addition, have you researched that people WANT to go back to the
site that led them to your web app? sometimes people move on to the
next site for a reason and really are done with the first one...
Joe
On Jan 19 2008, at 07:18, Simon Cockayne wrote:
Hi,
Are we a
ainst WS
does it not? In the same way you do not create a difficult navigation
system hat you then have to explain is a navigation system you should
not replicate common functionality with a new, space-hogging function.
Joe
On Jan 18 2008, at 22:38, David Dorward wrote:
On 18 Jan 2008,
scribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Un
the form itself, perhaps
with mouseover text so it is accessibility compliant. How do those
with poor site look for your button? They shouldn't have to, the
button should announce itself for all to understand!
Sorry for the rant . but really
Joe
On Jan 14 2008, at 01:47, John Horner w
ROTECTED]
http://www.petermount.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
ing his XP shortcuts!
But definitely talk o others who made the transition so you feel
fully informed. As someone who works in a Mac-XP- server 2004 - Linux
- redhat - ubuntu environment, and has to support all of them, I know
where I'd put my money!
Joe
On Jan 13 2008, at 05:51, Peter M
computers" is just wrong.
Just wrong.
Stats for many of my sites, that appal to a wide commercial audience
has IE at 80% or less.
The rest of what you say is sensible and intelligently put, but
please read your comms before sending hem as you do need a reality
check on occasion.
joe
O
Thank you for your sanity check steve!
Joe
On Jan 13 2008, at 05:34, Steve Olive wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:45 pm Michael Horowitz wrote:
The answer is very simple. 100% of potential users of a website
have IE
on their computer.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http
I tried sending an email to "Web Site" but got an "address not valid"
error!
;-)
Is that like sending a letter to "North Pole" ?
Joe
On Dec 21 2007, at 04:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 21/12/2007 and will not
ret
hops have cameras and security guards to make the fact that we are
being observed in their premises as unobtrusive as possible yet still
allow some semblance of security and deterrent. We accept this as
long as the guards aren't right in our pockets and the cameras are
hidden in corn
, so we could address their concerns directly.
Joe
On Oct 10 2007, at 04:46, marvin hunkin wrote:
Hi.
doing a project for my website development course.
now, part of the requirements says that i need to create a story
board to represent what content is to be displayed on each page.
Now sighted
it, I'm going to sue.
Idiocy.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
over here. You don't
even have alt tags on your images. Hypocritical aren't ya?
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubsc
it, I'm going to sue.
Idiocy.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
it, I'm going to sue.
Idiocy.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com
ist Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PRO
s.com/2007/01/30/aspnets-attempt-at-valid-
xhtml/
ASP and .NET has too many instances of bad code generation and no-one
is taking MS to task for this.
Joe
On Sep 28 2007, at 19:53, Tim Offenstein wrote:
I have a page I want to validate. W3C says it's valid XHTML
Transitional but Tidy c
online for us to investigate
as it may be something else in the surrounding page not just this
element in it?
Joe
On Sep 27 2007, at 18:43, Bas V wrote:
I need to scroll a lot of photo thumbnails in a box that shows only
2 rows of images at the time.
The right-hand scroll bar from the
show an
abstract – often not the solution and it is a waste of space then. I would still like to be a member, but
again I can’t log in any more.
Thank you,
Joe Sieben
Creative Director
Spicy
Company Imaging
www.spicy.com.au
tel. 07 55 800 900
Suite 213/3 Sir John Overall
behaviour. Then again, using
FF1.5RC3
P
--
Joe Huggins
Brilliant Mistake Web Design
www.brilliantmistakewebdesign.com
303.903.8352
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
Hello,
This has to do with specificity. The use of the id in #hilite p is a
more specific rule than the class in .normal.
When you re-write it to #hilite .normal that rule now becomes more
specific. An id is more specific than a class.
For more on this:
http://www.htmldog.com/guides/cssadv
Does anyone know the best way to create draggable container elements?
Dean Edwards (him of IE7 fame) has put something together that works in
IE and FF:
http://dean.edwards.name/my/examples/moz-behaviors/
**
The discussion list for http://w
ight: 36px;
padding: 6px 0 0 51px;
}
Thanks Vaska, but I am using that hack already, But I need to target
version 5.1 (OS9 ) separately from version 5.23 (OSX) as they seem to
have slightly different behaviors with regard to relative/absolute
position
Hi [WSG],
I'm wondering if anybody can help. I'm having real problems positioning
an element absolutely on Mac IE 5. It works fine in IE 5.23 on Mac OSX
but is out on IE 5.1 on OS9.
Does anybody know a way of targeting IE 5.1 on OS9 without effecting IE
5.23 on OSx?
Thanks in ad
It's doing the same here on IE 5.1.7.
It's ok here on IE 5.23 on OSX
joe
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Ian Fenn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Seems like keeping developers employed in jobs that support web
standards would be important to web standards themselves.
I agree.
Me too. Whose decision was not to allow job vacancies to be posted?
*
6&dateformat=%25o%20%25B%20%25Y
Applications, via covering letter and CV (i.e. not just a link to a
portfolio site) to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
joe leech
p.s. I know the website is not standards compliant. We are working on it!
**
The discussio
Javier wrote:
Hi All
I need to make a mail with xhtml/css. It´s possible ?
Are there tools to make this ?
Any idea welcome...
Try this tutorial:
http://alistapart.com/articles/cssemail/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
t. Scrap
the div and apply the styles to the along with display block.
So:
http://www.getfirefox.com"; title="Get FireFox">Get Firefox
a#firefox {
width:125px;
height:50px;
background: url('/weblog/images/takebacktheweb_small.png');
display:block;
}
a#fir
http://googlebar.mozdev.org. It works well and
seems to have nearly all of the features of the IE version (with the
exception of PageRank).
- Joe
--
Joe Winton, Web/Graphics Coordinator
Washington State University Vancouver
Office of Campus Advancement
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.546.9603
Anybody know of one? Preferably where the user has to login to change
the page.
joe
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration
for
notetaking and is not a free-standing method of "contributing" to the
call.
<http://www.w3.org/2004/08/30-wai-wcag-irc>
<http://fawny.org/blog/2003/11/#teleconf>
--
Joe Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expe
he conference?
Also, native Sydneysiders, please drop me a line. One has vacation
time after the conference, and one has *needs* in that respect.
--
Joe Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expect
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
