The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
>
>
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
h
You must have been using GET rather than POST.Spider's won't submit
forms that us POST, but they have every right to follow forms that use
GET.
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/04/24/deviant.html
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/05/06/This-Stuff-Matters
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pt
I know this has come up on the list before, but this is the first time
I have seen someone from Google formally address the issue.
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-unwise-comments/
Make sure you read the last two comments.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
www.browsercam.com
On 6/20/05, Colm Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to locate that really handy site that allow you to preview
> screenshots of your webpage on all browser/platform combinations. Does
> anyone know the URL.
>
> Regards,
> Colm
Guys I really can't see how this dicussion relates to web standards.
This is an ad for a product. Sure the output validates and there are
W3C logos in the footer, but seriously
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
*
bar opens at
6, so they should be interesting by 7.
See you there!
Robin Hilliard
ANZ Macromedia User Group Coordinator
-------
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion
ion for interest/provocation.
No worries mate - enjoy a good civil arguement (especially when I'm right :)
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
ove User Experience
Whats there for a client not to like?
I think we probably agree here - the technical detail of hows it done
is your problem, not theirs. They just want to know about the end
result in practical terms they can understand.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty
ks.
I really don't know if this thread is relevant on this list though -
if you are seriously interested in discussing google - go to the
Google News forum on Web master world.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
e list was probably not the best idea.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
o a lesser extent XSL) are all
true web standards and are completely relevant on this list, IMHO.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgrou
xtent and we go on using the web. its not perfect, but it has got us
where we are today and I certainly don't think there is some crisis
looming.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://w
Hi Charles
Download Firefox (if you haven't already) and then install the
LiveHTTPHeaders plug in (http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org/). Restart
Firefox and LiveHTTPHeaders will then be under the tools menu and all
your headers will be revealed.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
ows what on the Mac in C3.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
You make it sound like the two are mutually exclusive, which is very
misleading. There is nothing about the Dreamweaver template system
that doesn't conform with XHTML. Dreamweavers templating works through
the use of comments - nothing more.
--
Mark Stanton
Gr
in a variety of ways".
The title attribute != tool tip, a tool tip is one common way of
representing a title attribute.
Back in my box until friday night now...
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list
gt;
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *
Hi Clayton
I think we have assertained that the issue is not present in Firefox
1. This thread has now been closed - please do not respond further.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http
For the second time THIS THREAD IS CLOSED - please respond off-list
if you wish to continue the discussion.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
whole thing
as a learning experience and never start work on a project until you
have a documented signed off specification for what you are building
and a contract that commits the client to paying for it.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://
;re not sure of
something... as long as its not about font sizes :).
Also bear in mind that there are rarely absolute right and wrong
answers and its easy to get trapped in a cycle of navel gazing and
splitting hairs - check
http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/04/sq.html for beautiful
e
Sorry missed one part of your post:
> For example, can it be uses to group a number of related links together?
I'd suggest that Fieldset in this context is meaningless - its not
ArchorSet, its FieldSet - its for form fields. Use a list (ul or ol)
for links.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden
your family. This is
basically the same as using tables for visual layout. If you can do
the same thing using more appropriate elements and some CSS, you'll be
blessed with eternal good karma and will be worshipped as a standards
guru by the millions of list members.
Enjoy.
--
Mark Stan
Are you providing a plain text transcript of the audio file?
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#gl-provide-equivalents
(tougue firmly in cheek)
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http
to come out on a new page (like
excel does), rather than just cutting it off.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cf
Sorry again... every column is as skinny as it can get. I've got about
80 columns in the table :(
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Thanks Neerav
I've got rid of everything I can and reduced the fonts as much as I
dare and its still >300px too wide for a landscape A4.
I've tried setting widths to auto, 100%, px - nothing makes a difference.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://w
s lost.
Does anyone have any ideas no how to fix this issue?
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on p
Hey Joe
Good to see you on the list.
I'll also be speaking at the conference - thrilling the audience with
the finer points of semantic markup in the hang over slot (9am on the
second day). Would be good to catch up before, during or after -
Coffee, beer, whatever.
--
Mark Stanton
G
I've got to say the new version of Contribute is excellent in its ease
of use, CSS support, (x)HTML standards compliance and accessibility
support. I'm really starting to see it as the main option for
non-enterprise level content management.
Strongly suggest you try it.
--
Mark Stant
Scott
If I didn't know that you were going to be *very* involved in helping
Gary run the Brisbane meetings soon - I'd ban you too.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
**
The discussion list
Hey Mike
Going this far off topic on this list is a bannable offence - your
only option now, if you wish to stay on this list, is to set up a WSG
meeting in NZ.
(Only kidding about the banning, but please give the meeting idea some thought.)
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http
Also - http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/07/26/1090693888524.html
Firefox has been getting some good press recently.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
andy.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
I think that "only for stolen sites" comment is a little off. For
example I'll often develop something on my local machine on a URL like
http://localhost/project-name and then deploy it on its own URL.
is invaluable in this sort of situation.
--
Mark Stanton
Grude
or a class name. Describe *why* the data
in presented the way it is, rather than describing the presentation.
9.5 out of 10. Good stuff.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgrou
> Of course. The point is just to make it more difficult. A car alarm
> doesn't stop car theft, but with all else equal, the thief will choose
> one without an alarm.
That's fine & true but by making it difficult for spam bots you also
make it difficult for your users.
-
else) the more you
lose on accessibility.
Spam has to be stopped on delivery - hiding email addresses is a
bandaid solution and a poor one at that.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for
.org/resources/) except that is nice &
public and administrable by all WSG memebers.
Come on guys - lets make it a worth while resouce!
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstand
Hey All
I've creaked a "Standards related feeds" category in the resources on
section on the site - http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat32.
Feel free to add links to RSS & Atom feeds there.
I've taken the liberty of adding the ones already posted to this
thread under the names of those who
Hi Neerav
I think this is an excellent idea & I've got lots of great feeds that
I'd like to share & I'm sure others do to. The reason I'm closing it
is because I don't think the list is the best place for this resource
- I'd like to find somewhere more permanent on the site for it.
I'm going to e
Sorry to be a wet blanket guys but this has little or no bearing on
web standards.
From: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
The mail list does not cover:
* Non-Web Standards related issues and support
* Discussion of server-side scriptin
&
IE) at least I know what I'm aiming for.
Thanks for testing in those browsers - I'll go back to the designers
and see what they think.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob: +61 410 458 201
http://www
do 90% on a MAC use
when they look at an HTML email and then testing in that environment.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob: +61 410 458 201
http://www.gruden.com
ssue and what can I do to fix it?
Thanks in advance.
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob: +61 410 458 201
http://www.gruden.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
The discus
q=css+hacks
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob: +61 410 458 201
http://www.gruden.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgrou
**
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *
>
>
--
Mark Stanton
Tech
el so grumpy all the time.
Cheers
Mark
-
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob: +61 410 458 201
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgrou
rdsgroup.org/resources/documents/doc_6_accesstable.html
(view source on this one) for details.
Cheers
Mark
-----
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob: +61 410 458 201
http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
Guys hate to rain on your parade but if your browser can understand
that obfuscation what makes you think that a email address harvestor
is not going to be able to?
These guys are writing complex viruses that harvest email addresses
directly from people's Outlook contact lists, surely they can
und
Hey Jackie
I agree with you and think maybe I just didn't explain myself properly.
A guy in high school who has made a site for his uncle and one for his
soccer team is not going to be able to charge the same rate as someone
who has been developing site professionally for a number of years.
I c
Hey Guys
This is a service industry, provide cost based on how much the will
cost you to do (i.e. long the work takes you to do). Implementing
standards may save you time or add extra development time.
For example I feel that CSS based design takes less time and as such
should cost less that a de
Hi Taco
I really don't know the answers to your questions, but thats never
stopped me from trying to answer them in the past so why now? But
before I do can I just point out that this is coming off the top of my
head & from 5 minutes research on the web. I'm a geek, not a lawyer.
>Are there curre
Yeah - they have been working on this new version of about a year. The
main aim was to address the concerns that you mentioned. I think they
sent it live about a month ago.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2003Aug/0105.html
Great minds think a like?
Cheers
Mark
***
Hi Chris
Have you tried turning on verbose output? This can be done by going to
the extended interface at http://validator.w3.org/detailed.html or by
changing verbose=0 to verbose=1 in the URL.
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://webs
> I tried, in all my accessibility lovingness to add title tags to some images
> on a page today and it is telling me that the title tag is not allowed by the
> dtd and it won't parse the page.
I'm assuming that you are talking about the title= attribute rather
than the tag?
I tried the link y
Thanks Patrick
Yes you are right about being the top level container, but I
guess I was thinking about visible area - I never realised that you
could style the . Will try this out for sure.
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://websta
Hi
Please see the list guildines at
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm. If you want a
solution to your problem the guidlines will explain what information
you are going to need to provide in order to help us help you.
Cheers
Mark
**
Hi Razvan
I'd suggest the best option would be to make it a background image on
the body tag. Your body tag is going to be your top level containing
block so it will always stretch to the height of your content.
relative height: properties are always going to be relative to your
viewport or visibl
Hi John
I don't want to weigh into this argument of tables right or wrong - I
think all the angles are being covered pretty well at the moment. But
I read your post & a couple of things jumped out at me.
On the whole it's a good read & I agree with a lot of what you are
saying bit this section:
Hey Brian
> Okay in Moz everything on the MAIN page
> http://www.mosincorporated.com/site2/main.php is okay except for the white
> field with the scrollbars - this div expands pit about 8 pixels further than
> it should - the white of the menu side should be used as a guide as to what
> this side
Hey Guys
> All I get is an advertising page. Looks as though your domain name
> registration hasn't "taken" yet.
You should be able to set up your own local DNS entry to do the job in
the interim i, all we need is the IP address from Peter & a text
editor.
1) Find a file on your computer called
Hi Brian
I've checked your site in both IE & Firebird and have run it through
the CSS & HTML validators (one HTML page fails), but I still can't see
the problem. Descriptions such as "everything has gone wacky",
"things to display completely differently" and "broken something
somewhere" are not r
Hi Kevin
I don't have a access to NS6 on a mac, but just a friendly word of advice:
Please try to be more descriptive if you really want to get your
problem solved. Firstly use a nice descriptive subject line so that
people can quickly decide whether or not they are able to assist - I
would sugge
Hi Andy
No offence, but discussion of specific server side products is off
topic. Please check out the some the MT resource sites
(http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=moveable+type+%28resources+OR+tutorial+OR+learning%29&btnG=Search)
or the MT homepage
(http://www.movabletype.org/fre
Sorry - one other thing I forgot to mention... Tidy:
http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/
http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
f
I know the W3C validator is available as a Debian package (the link
checker is also part of the package) - we've got it running locally
here. The source of the HTML & CSS validators are available if thats
the sort of thing you are looking for.
http://validator.w3.org/source/
http://jigsaw.w3.org/
I agree with Ryan - coding for specific browsers is a futile excerise.
We do use javascript quite a bit but its usually to provide additional
funcitonality to users who are able to handle it. The empahsis is on
people still being able to use the site without javascript. This could
include things l
Ok guys this is heading off topic - lets keep it to discussion of the
ACA site or take it off the list.
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on p
Well at least someone has found a use for it -
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/05/02/user-friendly-feeds
Cheers
Mark
PS Sorry for being a troll, but i couldn't resist - please take it in
good humour.
*
The discussion list for http://webs
Hey Peter
I haven't checked it out in depth, but I just wanted to say that from
the quick glance I had, it looks stunning & the code is pretty sharp
to boot.
Big congratulations!
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.
There is some pretty nice code available at
http://www.qld.gov.au/web/cue/template/implementations.html that
sounds close to what you want. It doesn't "remember last state" but it
does generate some very nice tight & simple markup, works across a
range of browers and degrades well in the absences o
I believe there is an Atom feed that you might find more useful. Most
blog readers should handle it.
http://discuss.webstandardsgroup.org/atom.xml
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.
Hey Scott
The doctype that you are using:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
doesn't contain the elements that you are using in your code:
mycontent
mycontent
...so your document is invalid. I'm not going to jump up & down about
it must be valid or you will burn in t
spec, then read the DTD.
Everything you need to know is at w3c.org, it just takes time trying to
understand it all.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 2 9299 9462
Fax: +61 2 9299 9463
Mob:
"h1", "h2", "h3", "h4", "h5", "h6", "p", "div",
"address", "fieldset" start-tag'
This is exactly what its saying (almost).
If you change:
Name:
Email Address:
To:
Name:
Email Address:
> april fool.
The best one I've seen since Kochie's toupee this morning :)
http://www.seven.com.au/sunrise/aprilfools
Cheers
Mark
------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://w
l401/intro/sgmltut.html#h-3.3</a> might help you
decipher it. But the key point is that there is no language attribute.
So if you change <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
src="menu.js"> to
src="menu.js"> you should be
://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/covers/apr01-04/. Douglas' shameful "new
creative" can been seen here: http://www.stopdesign.com/.
Cheers
Mark
------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http:/
ternatives I just think
they are the weaker option.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup
w.adobe.com/web/features/
zeldman2821/main.html
I've always been tempted to get potential graphic artists to write a 500
word commentary on this article before giving them an interview :)
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 995
http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/04/03/30/0041253.shtml?tid=106&tid=126&t
id=185&tid=95
Very interesting - even if just to demonstrate how little most people
understand about CSS.
Cheers
Mark
------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 63
the list? :)
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guide
't want to argue about any of this, its been done 100 times before & I
certainly don't want to get personal. The only reason I am writing this
email is that I expressed an opinion and I don't particularly enjoy having
it misrepresented. I am not anti XHTML in any way - I've follo
> When the page specifies 'verdana, arial, helvetica,
> sans-serif', such people almost never get to see their preference.
...unless they are using user style sheets, then they get to see whatever
they want...
Cheers
Mark
----------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
aid that I think the approach you have taken (serving as xml
mime type where possible) is one of the more responsible ones at the moment.
I still don't think its worth the effort though.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden
tands the limitations and advantages of CSS you should be fine. If
they design it like a brouchure or a CDROM you're in big trouble.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 041
g to
your office for 3 days and helping your staff. Now where's that rock I was
hiding under
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
**
uldn't find pricing on individual sessions
Cheers
Mark
----------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
tly think this
would be way more work than its worth, both for you as the developer and for
the browser on each page load.
Cheers
Mark
------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
etely redundant because they are the default values.
Unless you have reset these values previously, you don't need to set them to
their default values.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.
es/Public/www-html/2002Oct/0009.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2002Aug/thread.html#240
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
*
How to debug CSS:
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2004/03/10/css_problems/index.php
Google goes anti semantic (h1's are to easily abused):
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/brandy-google-update
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel:
(like CFAUSSIE where this stuff is ok).
I'm not meaning to be harsh but we need to be considerate of those that are
concerned about mail volume.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9
ould this
just be "another CSS blog")? Or two lists, one for news and one for
implementation issues?
Anyway its an open issue at the moment - we're still trying to find the
right mix.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty L
DHTML behavior to load and parse all style
> sheets into
> > a form that Explorer can understand. You can then use most CSS2
> > selectors without having to resort to CSS hacks."
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
thought in. They have shown us some
respect by looking for our feedback, I'm sure we can make a valuable
contribution here.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
*
I know but...
variablevalue
... is just nicer IMHO.
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
th it for about 3 weeks - the
memory still causes me to break out in cold sweats.
There were so many people at MXDU that I wanted to meet but never got the
chance. Maybe next year it'll run for a week :)
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
T
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo