Hello,
I'm out of the office April 27 and 30. Should you need immediate assistance,
please write to Mark Cramer at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get back to you ASAP on Tuesday, May 1.
Thanks,
Wayne Randall
***
List Guidelines: http
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
[...] since ASP is obviously over whether its a good tool or not.
[...]
Thanks,
www.asp.net
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
Take a look at http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/SliderDemo
hth
:)
w.//
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anyone has knowledge on creating a custom scrollbar
graphic for controlling a div? I've seen custom buttons and can go
this route, but would like a custom scrollbar
OMG, a list of web proffesionals non-the-less!
On 12/12/05, Natalie Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can People PLEASE stop replying to this rubbish email.The list does NOT require you to reply.
Can an Admin please take care of it?
On 12/13/05, Fenguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL
Making an element invalid, whether it be in the HTML or through JS,
makes that element invalid. The validator might not catch it but the
fact stands.
Correct me if I am wrong.
HTH
:]
w .//
Jamie Mason wrote:
Hi all,
Did I ask something really daft here or...? I'd appreciate your help
or
It's a tricky one
How?
If a tree falls in a wood and no-one hears it - does it still make a noise?
w .//
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Quoting Jamie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Did I ask something really daft here or...? I'd appreciate your help or
opinions.
I'm at d.Construct at the
That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does.
Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards compliant, effiecientJS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? If your going to do that you might as well try to do it in plain text aswell.
HTH
w
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/ASPNET2XHTML.asp
VS2005 drastically improves this situ.
hth
:]
w
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I spoke with you all regarding issues with using CSS and
.NET. Below is the site underdevelopment. I'm told div's are casuing a
problem, in addition to
Title: RE: [WSG] Clearleft.com
Hi Komal, where are the
tables in that site??? Are you sure your looking at the right site?
w
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
Komal AgrawalSent: Tue 20/09/2005 17:15To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG]
Clearleft.com
Suggestion #1:
3.16
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
#main {
_margin-left: 245px;
_margin-right: 10px;
}
Clean CSS:
body.index #main {
margin-left: 250px;
margin-right: 15px;
background-color: transparent;
}
Or is there a better way to do this?
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED
David, you saved my butt again!
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 8, 2005, at 6:57 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
I feel a bit dumb asking this, but there's so much to learn and some
things sink in better than others! Anyway, I've had to do some hacks
to get IE
I think you will find that coldfusion makes life harder in respect to
web standards compliance. The code I have seen being churned out looks
like it has gone through a mangler with huge chunks of white space etc.
In general though, I agree with James, the server side language should
not really
wayne but
that wasnt a good answer ;)
most of the server sides are good with compliance except .net, which you
obviously can get to work but it requires much more time to
unmangle what ms gives you which shouldnt be a suprise to anyone!!!
The code I have seen being churned out looks
like it has
XAML is a document definition language which doesnt rely on a browser. It is a
whole new technology which allows us to develop applications which are fed from
a server. There is no browser. IE doesn't even come into it.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
I dont think XAML needs to be hosted inside IE?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Justin Carter
Sent: Fri 15/07/2005 02:19
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Longhorn Avalon - seismic shift for web standards?
I dont think Avalon and XAML will
the main content area first.
Again, the files:
http://vtest.jrations.com/test_page.php
http://www.jrations.com/css/main_final.css
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 4, 2005, at 12:40 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
I've started building a new template to get my main
and if anyone else has any ideas, I'm still hoping!
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 4, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On 5 Jul 2005, at 2:15 AM, Wayne Godfrey wrote:
My problem is in the header and specifically the subnav which, in
IE, throws the rest of the layout out
/test_page.php
http://www.jrations.com/css/main_final.css
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
will be
greatly appreciated.
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
The pages are set to load only four products and images at a time, so
hopefully that won't be too much of a drain to dial-up connections. My
choice would be to use only one image (and as little js as possible!),
so I'll give your way I try and see what happens. Thank you so much.
w
Wayne
individually,
using the above or even what you've given me below, can I eliminate the
height and keep the image constrained?
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 30, 2005, at 10:12 PM, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 06:00 PM 6/30/2005, Bert Doorn wrote:
If the image is to be replaced on hover
I actually got it to work using a little bit of everyone's information.
Thanks to everyone who helped out...
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 30, 2005, at 11:01 PM, Kevin Futter wrote:
On 1/7/05 12:41 PM, Wayne Godfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ideally I would like to use only one
techniques. Has anyone else run into this problem? I suspect there are plenty
of people, Id be interested to hear what thoughts others had on this
subject.
Cheers
Wayne
w: www.freelance-developer.co.ok
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] accesability and backwards compatibility - WAS [Hi
there!]
wayne wrote:
It's for a design agency who is now
saying that this is a requirement;
And that's the crux of the argument: if the project documentation
clearly states that the site must work and look same/similar
century web.
wayne
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 14, 2005, at 1:36 PM, Roger Johansson wrote:
On 14 jun 2005, at 14.20, Jad Madi wrote:
Hi
Will ADS break web standards in any mean ? such as Google ads, and
Amazon ads?
Yes. You need to use some workarounds to be able to serve
on my end!
The file:
http://vtest.jrations.com/hubs-n-such.php
The CSS:
http://www.jrations.com/css/main_test.css
http://www.jrations.com/css/hubs.css
The second CSS file controls the table on this page.
Thanks in advance,
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED
applied there...
You all are the greatest bunch of people to work with... Thank you so
much, maybe I'll even get some sleep tonight as well!!
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 13, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Zachary Hopkins wrote:
Removing width: 100%;, fixes the problem in IE, but causes the table
Sorry, got waylaid on a few other pressing problems. This answer makes
complete sense and I feel like a dummy for missing it altogether!
Thanks to everyone on the list for your help.
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 12, 2005, at 11:11 PM, Ben Crothers wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Looks like it's
Thanks Mike, but that didn't work. I tried reducing the width from
390px to 385px and also changing to width: 100%, neither worked. This
is so frustrating.
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 12, 2005, at 8:47 PM, Mike Pepper wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
The 380px worked for the top h1 but now IE is centering the h2 text
underneath, even though the CSS says align left. Getting there, but why
is IE doing this?
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 12, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Ben Crothers wrote:
...or width: 380px; ...?
Ben Crothers
-Original
, it is incorrect and no amount of
accessibility will ever make me change my mind.
I too dislike being harsh, but I thought this was a dead issue somewhere
around the late 80s...
Wayne
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL
Paul,
I just checked your layout in IE 5.1.7 Mac (OS 9), on Firefox (OSX). Both of
them look the same and fine. If you'd like a screen shot, I'll send them off
list, just give me an email address. The page is coming along nicely.
Wayne
--
Wayne Godfrey
in the OS, just like they always do. No sense in playing fair now...
wayne
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the same here on IE 5.1.7.
w
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org
...
w
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
against the wall at times, but it's
the BEST way to learn. Once you start feeling comfortable, you'll be able to
open any source code and start tearing it apart to figure out how something
was accomplished. Learn the basics...it'll go a long way.
w
--
Wayne
transparency in my PNG-24 and
have IE display it? Or is there some hidden catch?
w
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
work, it would make my life a lot easier.
w
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
**
The discussion list for http
to the input fields, won't that effect the fieldset? Or am I
missing something here? I've been avoiding this form thing like the plague,
but I've got no choice now...gotta get it done.
Wayne
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
on the site as well. Any help will be greatly
appreciated
Wayne
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
The simplicity of it all.
Thanks Patrick, I doubt that I would have ever come up with this solution,
which is why I posed the question in the first place!! Forms are mysterious
creatures to meThanks again.
wayne
**
The discussion list
Is it possible to use two or more ids in the body of a page?
I have a nav and a sub nav that I'd like to be able to light up. It seems
I can use unlimited class elements, but I can't get more than one id to work
at a time.
Wayne
On 1/14/05 9:26 PM, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By definition, an element can only have a single, unique id.
Boy do I feel dumb...
w
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
.php
CSS: http://www.jrations.com/css/main.css
Any help will be greatly appreciated, as I seem to be having one of those
brain-dead days...arrggg!!
Wayne
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
think!!
Patrick: I'm going to go see what you have up your sleeve and I'll get back
to you later...I always like weird!
Thanks,
Wayne
--
Wayne Godfrey
President, Creative Director
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
are theirs. In fact, that's the corporate philosophy across
the board and now they're heading into your living room! Can't wait to see
what havoc they reek there.
As the other posts have said, they've had ample opportunity and time to get
things right, where are we now? Hacks and java scripts...
Wayne
you probably don't care about me anyway,
since that seems to be the general consensus of the web these
days...whine...
Really old Mac OS 9.2.2/IE 5.1.7
Wayne
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
I am on holiday !!
Back on the 10th of Jan.
Contact Adrienne Foley for urgent stuff.
__
This message contains information, which is confidential and may be subject to
legal privilege.
If
there would be greatly appreciated.
Wayne Godfrey
Outgate Media, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
code - something I know is there, that makes things work, that I don't
understand and am paying you to deal with
markup - What, you mean like price markup or what?
Gotta agree with Jonathan, markup in the agency business is what the client
is going to get charged above and beyond. They may
(so
to speak) makes sense, though I'd prefer that those browsers were used by or
preferably eaten entirely by the dogs.
Enjoy your upcoming Mac, I know you will.
wayne
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
mixed QT with Flash for some good results. So much depends on
what exactly is involved in the small video. If you're talking just video
or audio/video and/or special effects etc. There is no easy, simple answer
without knowing what exactly you need. And even then, there is no easy
answer.
Wayne
On 11/10/04 6:38 PM, Kenneth Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to convert a site ( laid out with tables and using points and
pixels for font-sizing ) into full Web Standards.
The old home page is at http://www.weedsbluemountains.org.au/index.htm
This uses tables and absolute font
the great info provided.
wayne
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Actually, you are correct, but why? The images aren't a part of the dl,
dt or dd so why does that effect them? I changed the border-bottom to
5px and sure enough I got a five-px big dotted line! I'm just not sure of
why the images are effected...
None of the img a:hover thoughts work, I've tried
Thanks for everyone's help. After messing around with the order of the CSS
and eliminating the the global links, I finally got the page to behave.
Well, at least 'till my next batch of code! One small step...one step at a
time...
On 10/22/04 5:35 PM, Anton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
Wow, they changed the color?
I always got the shakes when it seemed like it was taking too long...I'd get
this big lump in my throat and immediately start thinking about what could
possibly be wrong! At least to this point, my biggest problems have been my
really lousy typing...ok, so myh spelink
Okay, I'll stick my neck out here for a list chopping.
I personally like opening a new window whenever I'm web surfing. It's
something that I got into a habit or doing long ago and far away. I'm still
waiting for a big, honking G5 to be sitting under my fingertips, but until
that day I'm stuck on
On 10/5/04 8:17 PM, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Wayne, appreciate the risk ;-)
What you are describing though is your personal preference for opening
new windows - which I am all in favour for. I prefer tabbed window
browsers myself and open alot of tabs - and therein lies
Patrick,
Thank you for the both links and the explanation of PNGs. I got a bit
overwhelmed in reading the link info and forgot my manners, so please
forgive me, but I do thank you for the info, it's been a great help.
Again, Thanks,
wayne
On 9/29/04 7:52 PM, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED
felt more able to
answer some questions myself...
Wayne Godfrey
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held
validates, what's my problem? All the code is in the source, any help will
be greatly appreciated.
This is currently a page holder while I race the clock to rebuild the table
miss-mash that already exists.
The example page is at http://www.jrations.com/
In advance, Thanks.
Wayne Godfrey
pages from the
local drive and the images did appear.
wayne
On 9/24/04 10:42 PM, Bert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day
Loads fine for me in Firefox 1.0PR.
You haven't disabled images in Firefox (through the web developer toolbar)
by chance?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Web Developer
Better
64 matches
Mail list logo
