Lachlan Hunt wrote:
.html opens normally in any browser
.xhtml
Firefox will report well-formedness errors, page info dialog will
typically show application/xhtml+xml.
Just to make sure I've got it (somewhat) right at my end...
I'm more or less aware of how easy it is to mess things up,
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I'm more or less aware of how easy it is to mess things up, so for the
last 2 years I've used the following procedure:
- Creating an xhtml 1.0 document.
- Cleaning out 'human bugs' in HTMLTidy - 'convert to xml'.
- Serving it as 'xhtml' with the extension
- Creating an xhtml 1.0 document.
- Cleaning out 'human bugs' in HTMLTidy - 'convert to xml'.
- Serving it as 'xhtml' with the extension '.xhtml' to browsers that can
make anything out of it - Opera, Moz/FF, Safari - internally and on line.
Info: application/xhtml+xml - no errors -
Donna Jones wrote:
- Creating an xhtml 1.0 document.
- Cleaning out 'human bugs' in HTMLTidy - 'convert to xml'.
...
line 2 above, how do you convert to xml? I have Tidy installed on
mozilla/fx but i don't see anyway to convert. More explanation would
be appreciated!
I use a rather
Lachlan Hunt said:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I'm more or less aware of how easy it is to mess things up, so for the
last 2 years I've used the following procedure:
- Creating an xhtml 1.0 document.
- Cleaning out 'human bugs' in HTMLTidy - 'convert to xml'.
- Serving it as 'xhtml'
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
An added advantage of including the 'xml declaration' is that IE7 won't
be triggered by it. IE7 will simply skip it and treat 'xhtml 1.0' in
'Strict mode'. Therefore we have a built-in filter to avoid feeding IE6
styles to IE7, when our IE6 styles are using the old '*
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
An added advantage of including the 'xml declaration' is that IE7
won't be triggered by it. IE7 will simply skip it and treat 'xhtml
1.0' in 'Strict mode'. Therefore we have a built-in filter to
avoid feeding IE6 styles to IE7, when our IE6 styles
Could someone please spell the appropriate markup on the XHTML versus
HTML issue?
In other words, instead of the following:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
On 12/3/05, T. R. Valentine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put another way, is the value for 'content' the key for determing MIME type?
The reason I am puzzled is that the latter example (which, *if* I have
understood what has been written should not work in IE because it is
XHTML) appears to be
On 03/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your server is sending the MIME type text/html, then the META
doesn't do anything. You need to change the MIME type being sent out
in the headers, and that is done server side.
Thanks for that explanation. But what about when simply
2005/12/3, T. R. Valentine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your server is sending the MIME type text/html, then the META
doesn't do anything. You need to change the MIME type being sent out
in the headers, and that is done server side.
Thanks
T. R. Valentine wrote:
On 03/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your server is sending the MIME type text/html, then the META
doesn't do anything. You need to change the MIME type being sent out
in the headers, and that is done server side.
The only reason the meta element
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Is there any situation where IE6 renders in standard compliance mode
with the ?xml ... preamble?
Juergen Auer responded:
If IE6 finds an Xml-Declaration, he switchs in BackCompat.
If my understanding is correct, then this should be phrased somewhat
Collin,
Then why would W3C use it on their own site? This is the first 4 lines
of their source code for their home page:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html
://www.strombergarchitectural.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carol Doersom
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:32 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] XML Declaration
Collin,
Then why would W3C use it on their own site
://www.strombergarchitectural.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carol Doersom
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:32 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] XML Declaration
Collin,
Then why would W3C use it on their own site? This is the first 4 lines
Hi,
I vaguely remember reading if the xml declaration position the
following:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
head
titleVirtual
://www.strombergarchitectural.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Kennon
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:58 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] XML Declaration
Hi,
I vaguely remember reading if the xml declaration position the
following
Yes, I agree. XML Declaration must be (when used) the very first
element in the document.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
Hi,
I thought the article suggesting this was the specification, so I
asked. I'll file it under 'Urban Myth.
C
On Thursday, March 24, 2005, at 08:08 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
Chris Kennon
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;
html
Collin Davis
Per the W3C
specs, XHTML should be served as application/xhtml+xml or
application/xml or
text/xml and should not be served as text/html.
Actually, it doesn't say should not! As per section 5.1, it
actually states that documents may be sent as text/html:
XHTML Documents which
On 25 Mar 2005 at 9:22, Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Is there any situation where IE6 renders in standard compliance mode with
the ?xml ... preamble?
If IE6 finds an Xml-Declaration, he switchs in BackCompat.
I did use two testpages, look at http://www.sql-und-xml.de/
then at
22 matches
Mail list logo
