How about an alternative to your prediction. WSJT-X is open source.
You have complete access to the source code, and one of the wonderful
conveniences of the package is the ability to customize the software to
a specific style of station operations.
That is the fancy and PC way to say, if y
Hi Jeff,
Yes, I agree - I am a contributor to some other open source projects.
Thanks for your helpful suggestion.
I've given that some thought, but at least the last time I looked the build
process / toolkit for building WSJT-X on Windows is like top secret or
something, and I haven't spent any
Not exactly a secret. For building on Microsoft virus, the sdk is
located here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/jtsdk/
It is my understanding that it's going through some updates, but what is
posted should work. Last time I played with it was back in version
1.7. I haven't kept up with th
Put me down for also wishing to have that on the main screen. Or more
accurately in my case, having a check box or link on the main screen that is
linked to Special Operating Activity. Yes, handy to quickly go to and from F/H
mode but also convenient at the start and end of one of the contests l
In your case I would suggest create a separate CONFIGURATION for each
mode you're using. You can setup one for regular use, then one for
other special modes such as the NA VHF contest, Field Day, Fox & Hound,
etc.
All you need to do is switch over to the mode you're going to use by
selecting t
Neil,
I wish to take a moment please to outline what I see is the problem with
the configuration options as a solution that everyone keeps answering with
when this comes up. I dont think the case why the configuration mode
changes annoy many has ever been clearly articulated.
If I am tuning aroun
Grant,
as F/H specifically requires you to reply to a Fox CQ above 1000 hz, and
since the decoder decodes the entire passband based on the base
frequency set, you would not need any 'waterfall history' to determine
where to Tx your reply.
Maybe I'm missing the point.
That said, my reply was spe
The check box used to be on the main screen of the UI and people kept checking
it by mistake and causing all sorts of issues and questions so it was moved to
the menu and those questions and issues ceased to be replaced by a less
frequent request to put it back where it was. The needs of the man
This seems like similar logic to that that led to the ill-conceived "move
the log-it button randomly" feature.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:45 PM James Shaver (N2ADV) via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> The check box used to be on the main screen of the UI and people kept
>
Well said, Grant. From where I sit, very active on 6M, and both DX
chasing and contesting on HF and MF, the only poor decisions made by by
the design team are based on their lack of broad experience below VHF.
That's the only possible explanation for how 40M FT4 ended up where it did.
Your com
On 10/10/2021 7:12 PM, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote:
as F/H specifically requires you to reply to a Fox CQ above 1000 hz, and
since the decoder decodes the entire passband based on the base
frequency set, you would not need any 'waterfall history' to determine
where to Tx your reply.
Su
Jim,
FYI - Neil and James don't believe a clear frequency matters based on past
conversations I have had with them. I contend they have never tried chasing
DX where every path starts at 8000 miles (ie out of VK). The standard FT8
channels are so congested these days that trying to target working
p
for the F/H - Contest brigade
Rather than extra buttons / tick boxes on the existing busy screen for a
dedicated group of users, would a small pop-out window like that used for
the Astronomical data display be a better proposal?
I know its a bit of a radical shift of thinking and of course would
13 matches
Mail list logo
