Re: [wsjt-devel] AGC affecting SuperFox decoding #FH

2024-09-28 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
tnx Jim- Bill W2PKY On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 10:52 AM James Shaver (N2ADV) via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > This, IMO, is the best answer. I know that humans like > one-size-fits-all/blanket answers but, realistically, the only > one-size-fits-all answer

Re: [wsjt-devel] AGC affecting SuperFox decoding #FH

2024-09-28 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Perhaps a message to the user: "Consider experimenting with AGC settings for best SF decoding" Bill W2PKY On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 10:07 AM 5p1kzx via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi all > Sometimes AGC is usefull and other times AGC off is bette

Re: [wsjt-devel] CY9C

2024-08-30 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
They are on 80M regular F/H right now, easy. GL Bill W2PKY On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bill Barrett wrote: > Hello Gary- > I worked them last night on 160M from Central Fl. So 80M SB possible. > Like many I also need 80M. My Qs have been showing up in Club Log the next > day. &

Re: [wsjt-devel] CY9C

2024-08-30 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Gary- I worked them last night on 160M from Central Fl. So 80M SB possible. Like many I also need 80M. My Qs have been showing up in Club Log the next day. 73 & GL w/80M Bill W2PKY On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 9:44 PM Gary McDuffie via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] RC-6 observations

2024-08-25 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
The Improved version does not control the Flex SSDR SW properly. Bill W2PKY On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 6:29 PM Joe via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Is this the latest and greatest version? > https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt-x-improved/files/latest/downl

Re: [wsjt-devel] Comment on Superfox/hound release rc6

2024-08-11 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
have their AGC disabled for maximum decoding efficiency. However, the number of successful Qs/min completed is phenomenal compared to previous multiple stns decoding. 73; Bill W2PKY On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 12:08 PM Tom Hauer via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > First,

Re: [wsjt-devel] -rc6 transmit disable

2024-07-20 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
panel to restore the audio connection. Fortunately the FOX K8R completed the Q and I was in the log. Never had anything like this happen in all the years on WSJT-X or after this incident. Bill W2PKY On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 12:25 AM Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex slice/hamlib rc5

2024-07-02 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Al- Great idea, tnx fer the idea. 73; Bill W2PKY On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 12:25 PM k0vm via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Hint to Flex users... >To make life easier in the future.. Set a DHCP ip address reservation > for your radio

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex slice/hamlib rc5

2024-07-02 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Mike- Instead of Network Server, how about Radio IP? Thanks; Bill W2PKY On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:47 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Maybe I can make the error message a bit better -- yes -- you do need the > radio's IP addre

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex slice/hamlib rc5

2024-07-02 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Mike- Good to know there are settings for SSDR, is there a tutorial on how to use these new settings. Could not find anything in the Ver 2.7 User Guide. Thanks; Bill W2PKY On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 10:15 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode

2023-12-07 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
A few days ago I worked a ZL stn with 80 watts to a 40ft vertical with just a few long radials. My report was -11 on FT8. >From time to time 160M propagation is amazing even during strong Sun Spot cycle times. Bill W2PKY Tampa Fl. ___ wsjt-devel mail

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 on 160m with Beverage antenna

2023-11-13 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
https://www.w8ji.com/receiving.htm Best DX Bill W2PKY On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 6:12 PM Neil via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Glenn, I've only been using Beverages on 160m for 40 years, so this is > a somewhat partial and subjective view, but they cert

Re: [wsjt-devel] 3Y0J strange F/H operation

2023-02-15 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
> nobody had a GPS time sync (which I find almost unbelievable). Boggles the mind. On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:20 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > TimeFudge will not correct a 15-second error. > > Their clock was apparently 15 seconds off and nobody had

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 GA Release

2023-02-14 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
The error was due to an instance of WSJT-X running while trying to update. Sri; Bill W2PKY On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:49 PM Bill Barrett wrote: > Stuck on this error, Am I doing something wrong? > > > Bill W2PKY > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-de

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 GA Release

2023-02-14 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Stuck on this error, Am I doing something wrong? Bill W2PKY On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Barry, > > There have been *many* announcements in a variety of places about our > switch from the Princeton

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible RC4 issue

2022-09-19 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
I've had three segfaults on rc4. One when I had just started up, another after I had been running for a little while, and a third when I clicked the "menus" button. No other correlation that I could find. I didn't find a "core" file. On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:32 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib errors please for RC4 #hamlib

2022-09-14 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
No errors re hamlib. Line like the following at startup: [RIGCTRL][2022-09-14 00:12:04.983628][00:00:00.272132][info] Hamlib version: Hamlib 4.5~git Sun Sep 04 16:38:41 2022 + SHA=6c746c w8lvn On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:13 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wr

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decodes with strong QRM

2022-09-08 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Sam- Thanks for the explanation and reply to my post. 73; Bill On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 7:57 AM Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I will quote an email passage from Reino OH3M > > "there are three dimensions t

[wsjt-devel] Decodes with strong QRM

2022-09-07 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
D2UY was interfered with by stns previously worked. The decoder picked out both stns. Amazing! Bill W2PKY ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX v2.6.0-rc3 crash

2022-09-07 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
Will do. On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:16 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > rc4 has been released. > > Please try that. > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 04:04:25 PM CDT, Bill Lederer via >

[wsjt-devel] WSJTX v2.6.0-rc3 crash

2022-09-07 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
I'm running v2.6.0-rc3 for a few days now and have experienced a small number of crashes. The message is "Segmentation fault core dumped wsjtx". I am running Ubuntu 22. uname -a gives Linux w8lvn 5.15.0-46-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 4 18:03:25 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I can'

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc4

2022-09-07 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
I had the same issue on my Ubuntu 22 AMD_64 Intel NUC boxes for rc3. Successful build from source. Previous releases installed OK from the .deb file. On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:07 PM robert evans LAST_NAME via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Downloaded: > wsjtx_2.6.0-rc4_ar

Re: [wsjt-devel] Ubuntu installation

2022-09-03 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
That has worked for me up to this ubuntu-22 -- there is an error message about libboost-71 being a required component, but not having an install candidate. Thus for my ft8 machines, I have done the compile. On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 9:36 PM Jeff Stillinger via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourcefor

Re: [wsjt-devel] Ubuntu installation

2022-09-01 Thread Bill Lederer via wsjt-devel
Doesn't work for me lately. Also, which version are you getting when you install it with apt get? w8lvn On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 7:00 PM John Fioroni via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > You might add a note to your Users Manual that installing wsjtx under > Ubuntu is a sim

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

2022-08-05 Thread Bill Frantz via wsjt-devel
s”, where there are no mistakes in logging the calls and exchanges for a large number of QSOs. 73 Bill AE6JV ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] QSO 15 meters FT8 F/H not logged!

2022-02-19 Thread Bill Frantz via wsjt-devel
ke an extra click could be nice, but I also drive a manual transmission. The clutch operation keeps me from dying from boredom in a traffic jam. And I remember JT9 as being as exciting as watching paint dry. (I have one JT9 QSO in my log.) 73 Bill AE6JV ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] Simulating logging of QSO

2022-02-07 Thread Bill Frantz via wsjt-devel
You can use two or more computers with loud speakers and microphones to set up fox/hound testing. You don’t need to go through a sound card or all the way to RF, just put them reasonably close so they can “hear” each other. 73 Bill AE6JV > On Feb 7, 2022, at 16:25, Björn Ekelund via wsjt-de

Re: [wsjt-devel] Regressions in WSJT-X ver 2.5.0

2022-01-27 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Team- Running 2.5.2 "deep decode" recently saw 90-100 decodes posted on 40M in the evening but the waterfall and JTAlert show about 1/2. Finally the Band Activity section shows about 1/2 the large count. Anyone else seeing this? Thanks; Bill W2PKY On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.3 GA Release for macOS

2021-12-13 Thread Bill Frantz via wsjt-devel
I installed it on 10.14.6 Mojave and it seems to work. I haven't been able to give a full on-the-air test, but it does decode and transmit. (I live in a Faraday cage, so QSOs are difficult. I do most of my radio operating from a nearby shack.) 73 Bill AE6JV On 12/13/21 at 2:24 PM, wsjt-

Re: [wsjt-devel] Unsubscribe from Mailing Lists

2021-11-22 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 22/11/2021 19:45, Eddy Winrow via wsjt-devel wrote: Evening Gents, Can you please remove my email address from your mailing list? Kind Regards and 73s DF3DDY Eddy Hi Eddy, you can do that yourself from here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/lists/wsjt-devel/unsubscribe 73 Bill

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement

2021-11-22 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
rnal application driven by the WSJT-X UDP Decode messages should be able to reply to each decode, when relevant, with a DecodeHighlight message within that deadline. The UDP latency is less than milliseconds when both applications are running on the same host. 73 Bill G

Re: [wsjt-devel] Status File Error WSJT-X v2.5.2

2021-11-18 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
directory? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFOs reversing

2021-11-16 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Sam, you have not understood my comments and the reason for the dummy command, please read my explanation again. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 16/11/2021 15:00, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Bill, Any invalid command will result in a '?;' response, even a SET command. i.e. if you send &

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFOs reversing

2021-11-16 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
end either an ACK or NACK response to all commands, so with them there is no ambiguity. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFOs reversing

2021-11-13 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
. https://github.com/Hamlib/Hamlib/wiki/Documentation 73 Bill G4WJS. On 12/11/2021 23:11, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi, The problem that I can see cropping up is that on some rigs you can not change the frequency of the Sub VFO until it becomes the Main VFO when the rig status changes to TX

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFOs reversing

2021-11-12 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
amlib) when transmitting split on a rig by rig basis. Given that a number of rigs cannot be queried for the current VFO I would think that the best option for Hamlib is not to change the current VFO when transmitting split. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-

Re: [wsjt-devel] VAC issue

2021-11-12 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 12/11/2021 17:14, Chris Elmquist wrote: On Tuesday (07/27/2021 at 09:53AM +0100), Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 27/07/2021 06:51, Bjorn via wsjt-devel wrote: Hello Maybe this is a known issue. But anyway: I have 10 VAC channels going here and I use 1 and 2 towards the WSJT-X

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible WSJT-X 2.5.2 Bug(s)

2021-11-11 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Hi Stephen, what do you have for the baud rate and poll interval in Omni-Rig? Also what order do you start things up in, including turning on the rig? 73 Bill G4WJS. On 11/11/2021 14:22, Stephen Mitchell via wsjt-devel wrote: It's an Icom IC-7610.  I have it connected to the PC via th

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible WSJT-X 2.5.2 Bug(s)

2021-11-11 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
program.  I don’t know if these are true bugs or if I just don’t have something configured properly. Thank you – K7CB Hi Stephen, on your issue (2), what rig are you using and how is it hooked up to WSJT-X for CAT control? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X on Local and Remote Stations - Nasty Automatic Transmit Enable

2021-11-05 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
ayne AB6A Hi Dwayne, agreed that is not particularly desirable behaviour in this rather unusual situation. The simple workaround is not to put WSJT-X into FT8 DXpediition Hound mode if you have no intention of transmitting from that instance. 73 Bill G

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-04 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
n would be more helpful. I have programmed plenty of UIs, interesting to see how users trip over the simplest of situations. Obviously enjoying the panel options on the Call Signs Window. Terrific app, could not operate digital without it. 73; Bill W2PKY On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:53 PM Laurie,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface. That works! Bill W2PKY On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:46 PM Bill Barrett wrote: > Hello Laurie- > Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. > 244 does not reveal the extra fi

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Laurie- Is it 244 or 224? either on does not work on the initial instance. 244 does not reveal the extra fields. 224 reveals the extra fields but does not work. see ??? for band data on initial instance and no decodes in Call Signs window. Where am I going wrong? Thanks; Bill On Wed, Nov 3

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Peter- Thanks, yes, if 224 and the extra fields are present and 127 is entered the extra fields go away. On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:08 PM Peter Sumner via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hello Bill, > yes those displays are indeed different as on

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X settings Reporting tab

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11 does anyone know why they are different? Thanks; Bill W2PKY ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.1 EU VHF Contest Tx3 message problem

2021-11-03 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
no more than 30 characters and that causes EU VHF Contest Mode messages to be incorrectly generated. It is fixed for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X not recognising multiple Virtual Audio Cables

2021-11-02 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 02/11/2021 13:05, Dave Fitches via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Bill and thanks for the asssit - it's greatly appreciated! Audacity IS showing all VAC's in both recording and playback devices. I downloaded the audio_devices_enumeration.exe file and ran it... it gave a we

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X not recognising multiple Virtual Audio Cables

2021-11-02 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
f you are concerned about downloading an executable from the Internet, here is a ZIP archive containing the source code a Visual Studio solution to build it: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6mj0f68q7xd07h4/audio_devices_enumeration.zip?dl=1 73 Bill G4WJS. __

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X not recognising multiple Virtual Audio Cables

2021-11-01 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Bill- Thanks for taking the time to explain the complexity of dealing with SDR Digital Data. Bill W2PKY On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:38 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Bill, > > typical SDR console applications deliver samples vi

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X not recognising multiple Virtual Audio Cables

2021-11-01 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Bill, typical SDR console applications deliver samples via audio devices, some have other mechanisms but most of those are not to a common standard. What is actually passed over an audio device stream need not be audio, for example many (most) SDR consoles are capable of producing (and

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X not recognising multiple Virtual Audio Cables

2021-11-01 Thread Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
Hello Bill- Do you see a possibility that WSJT-X might one day have a direct connection to SDR Digital Data Stream input bypassing the typical DAX module and Windows audio processing? Thanks; Bill W2PKY On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:48 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel < wsjt-de

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X not recognising multiple Virtual Audio Cables

2021-11-01 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
that all show up in both WSJT-X audio input and out devices as expected. do other applications that use audio devices via the MME audio sub-subsystem like Audacity show them? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@li

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 issues

2021-10-27 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
tx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.5.1.html#_standard_exchange 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.5.1 window width?

2021-10-25 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 25/10/2021 15:58, Martin Davies G0HDB via wsjt-devel wrote: On 25 Oct 2021 at 12:44, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Saku, it's not quite that simple. The width of a window is the sum of the widths demanded by the widgets and layouts contained within it. There is a regressi

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.5.1 window width?

2021-10-25 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
.5.1 which means the main window width is larger than it should be, that is fixed for an upcoming bugfix release. One factor that contributes, and should not, is the length of the longest save Tx 5 macro. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.5.1, KX-3, and Macs

2021-10-21 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Mike, WSJT-X on macOS is an application bundle, I guess from your comments you don't know about them. Anyway the Hamlib version with WSJT-X v2.5.1 is the same on all platforms and is 655337. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 21/10/2021 19:56, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Does the Mac versio

Re: [wsjt-devel] Back on the usage of Ref.Spec. for Linux systems

2021-10-20 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
ortran-11.2.1+git610-1.12.x86_64 gcc10-fortran-10.3.1+git1893-2.12.x86_64 libgfortran5-11.2.1+git610-1.12.x86_64 gcc-fortran-11-4.1.x86_64 For this reason is possible that something has changed as Bill has noticed and that reflects to have none effects for you and Kari. For Bill: Your patch has w

Re: [wsjt-devel] Back on the usage of Ref.Spec. for Linux systems

2021-10-20 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
WSJT-X or if you compiled it on your machine from source and if is the latter, do you set some specific parameter in the .configure command? I compile WSJT-X locally from the source tarball ( not githup ) and I use no special parameters. Just saw that Bill has managed to get the dump too, so

Re: [wsjt-devel] Back on the usage of Ref.Spec. for Linux systems

2021-10-20 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
. I am working on a repair. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Subprocess error when changing mode in rel 2.5.0

2021-10-19 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
subprocess error occurs : Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a C:\Users\erik\AppData\Local\WSJT-X -t C:\Users\erik\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X At line 31 of file C:\Users\bill\src\k1jt\wsjtx\lib\lorentzian.f90 Fortran runtime error: Index '0' of dimension 1 o

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-18 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
less the validation fails in which case the Log QSO dialog pops up anyway. Contest QSOs are much easier to validate due to the stricter exchange content rules. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.s

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65

2021-10-18 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Hi Conrad, it is already fixed for the next release. I'm not sure I understand what why you think it is so urgent, please detail a typical QSO sequence where you think there is a problem? 73 Bill G4WJS. On 18/10/2021 17:03, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel wrote: Thanks Bill, you can im

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-18 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 18/10/2021 14:29, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 18/10/2021 14:21, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Try this rigctld -v -Z -v -m 2003 -s 4800 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -t 4532 --serial_handshake=None --write_delay=5 Hi Mike, Going back to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-18 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
gctl(d) -m -L to see the available configuration options along with their default values. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65

2021-10-18 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
codes rather than base callsigns. As you point out it is not too serious in this case as the full calls without hashing are exchanged earlier in the QSO. That is not the case with non-standard calls that are not compound so the issue needs repairing. 73 Bill

Re: [wsjt-devel] Exaggerated reports given to lower tone freqs

2021-10-17 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 17/10/2021 21:38, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote: Il 17/10/21 17:31, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel ha scritto: On 17/10/2021 21:11, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote: Il 17/10/21 16:52, Kevin McQuiggin (SFU) ha scritto: Hi Marco: Did you follow the steps to record a reference

Re: [wsjt-devel] Exaggerated reports given to lower tone freqs

2021-10-17 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
(former IK5BCU)* Hi Marco, send me (g4wjs classdesign com) your refspec.dat file that causes a crash please? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjtx crash

2021-10-17 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
, get message, if I translate it right from Fin to Eng "memory overflow" (created core-file). Where this core-file is created, can't find it? Jarmo Hi Jarmo, the button to stop collecting reference spectrum data is the one labelled "Stop" on th

Re: [wsjt-devel] Grid Location info does not attach on outgoing messages.

2021-10-17 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
that if anyone knows what folder the settings data is in and is it easily editable?  If not, how can I be assured I have gotten all the old folders and data deleted before I start another clean install? 73, Bill KY4O Bill, check the callsign you have entered in "Settings->General",

Re: [wsjt-devel] Exaggerated reports given to lower tone freqs

2021-10-16 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
27;t know what the purpose of the reference spectrum is then it seems unlikely that you have measured your receiver reference spectrum. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/list

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig LF Rolloff

2021-10-16 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 16/10/2021 16:01, Virginia Greene via wsjt-devel wrote: As Bill wisely pointed out: 2) many rigs have considerable roll-off in receiver gain towards the bottom end of the expected receiver pass-band, the K3 is one of those BTW. This seems not to be well understood or appreciated. My own

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 92, Issue 57

2021-10-16 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 16/10/2021 11:12, George Baker via wsjt-devel wrote: Unsubscribe George, do that here: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [wsjt-devel] Exaggerated reports given to lower tone freqs

2021-10-16 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
ather than a reference spectrum correction if you receiver performance warrants it. Capturing a phase correction curve is somewhat more complex as it requires a known good MSK144 received signal rather than background noise as a reference baseline. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 16/10/2021 10:46, Hasan N0AN

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
ow though. Likewise with the test, it's evening here now. Cheers, Barry G4MKT Hi Barry, I have already sent Mike a copy of that document. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 15/10/2021 17:21, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 15:57, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: the TS-450S and TS-690S use RTS/CTS hardware handshake flow control. I have never see a rig with a serial CAT interface that uses XON/XOFF flow control, RTS/CTS is ubiquitous

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 15/10/2021 17:19, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:57, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/10/2021 16:18, Black Michael wrote: Since you're not getting any answer with hardware flow it sounds like you have a 3-wire RS232 cable.  So how are your cable pi

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
t command, no query version. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split-RIG broken with hamlib-4.3.1 with TS-450S (4.2 is fine)

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
ction, and more recent rigs that have a menu option to disable the default RTS/CTS hardware handshake flow control. Your interface may loop RTS and CTS at the rig end, that will provide a default RTS signal and will work with no flow control settings at the PC end.

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
o this list for over 3 hours now :\ Barry G4MKT Hi Barry, there have been two of your attempted posts rejected because they were not posted from an email address that is registered on the SourceForge list server. All the rest of you posts to this thread have arrived at the list without is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug report from v2.4.0 on FT8 and Kenwood TS-590SG

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Hi Marco, thanks for the update, glad you are up and running correctly now. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 14/10/2021 19:23, Marco Monari via wsjt-devel wrote: Problem solved overwriting with the new libhamlib-4.dll, many thanks! 73 Marco IK4PLZ On 14/10/2021 16:34, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote

Re: [wsjt-devel] Kenwood TS890S and Win10 21H1

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Kenwood or Microsoft, WSJT-X requires working audio devices. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 14/10/2021 19:15, oe1...@oevsv.at wrote: As I told before in Win7 everything works perfect. It is a problem of the basic installation in Win10. In Win7 when you connect the 890 a driver for the soundcard has been se

Re: [wsjt-devel] Kenwood TS890S and Win10 21H1

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Hi Enrico, have you followed the instructions in the TS-890S User Manual (page 1-4 in the English version) about setting the audio source input? In WSJT-X "Settings->Radio" select "Mode-Data/Pkt" and "Tx Audio Source->Rear". 73 Bill G4WJS. On 14/

Re: [wsjt-devel] Kenwood TS890S and Win10 21H1

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
of errors. Anybody who can give me a hint? tnx in advance Enrico, OE1EQW Hi Enrico, we need more information to address your query. How is your rig connected to your PC for audio? Do you have a CAT connection? Which application are you trying to run? 73 Bill G4WJS

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug report from v2.4.0 on FT8 and Kenwood TS-590SG

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request: Hound Mode

2021-10-11 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
by all modes and variants, the exceptions to that are WSPR, FST4W, Frequency calibration, and EME Echo mode. What appears to be empty space is almost always a hidden widget that appears with some other mode or mode variant. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-deve

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request: Hound Mode

2021-10-11 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Jon, that was an attempt to defeat some of the more trivial robot stations, unfortunately the mass opinion was that it was a misfeature so perhaps everyone is quite happy for the FT8 sub-bands to gradually fill with unattended robot operations? 73 Bill G4WJS. On 11/10/2021 03:48, Jon

Re: [wsjt-devel] Strance behaviour

2021-10-08 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 08/10/2021 12:08, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 08/10/2021 10:09, jarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: When listening 3DA0RU fox/hound mode, i copy 15m 090130 -10  0.8  297 ~  R5RC 3DA0RU - 090130 -10  0.8  357 ~  UI3A 3DA0RU - 090130  -9  0.8  417 ~  UA1OLM 3DA0RU No reports??? But

Re: [wsjt-devel] Strance behaviour

2021-10-08 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
ges in FT8 DXpedition Fox mode for that callsign. This may be due to some code used in older modes like JT65 being ctivated where 3DA0 prefixes are treated specially due to their non-standard composition. With FT8 they *should* be treated as non-standard calls, but clearly not in this case. 7

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question, FT8

2021-10-04 Thread Bill Frantz via wsjt-devel
entries in FTx contests than in CW, voice, or RTTY contests. So, in contests log the entry when the contest rules say you should. 73 Bill AE6JV * The Two Generals' Problem (from <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Generals%27_Problem>) In computing, the Two Generals' Problem is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Source 2.5.0 still corrupted

2021-10-02 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
corrupted, it is one of the built files, specifically a Fortran module file fftw3.mod. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Version 2.5 not linking to my IC-7800

2021-09-30 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
, including the details? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Some minor issues.

2021-09-30 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 30/09/2021 16:35, Marco Calistri wrote: Il 30/09/21 10:58, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel ha scritto: On 30/09/2021 14:36, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote: CQRLOG now has been compiled with the */chkvfo/* feature, settings adjusted as suggested but again _*no AFSK going to radio rear

Re: [wsjt-devel] Some minor issues.

2021-09-30 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
. There is no facility to select the Tx audio source other than the rig mode settings with the FT-100. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig Split in Hamlib

2021-09-28 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
file you can delete it and the log configuration file to return to normal operation. 73 Bill G4WJS. [Sinks.SYSLOG] Destination=TextFile Asynchronous=true AutoFlush=false FileName="${AppLocalDataLocation}/wsjtx_syslog.log" TargetFileName="${AppLocalDataLocation}/logs/ws

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compilation error 2.5.0

2021-09-28 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
, looks like an object file is corrupt, try a make-clean and try again. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

2021-09-28 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 28/09/2021 16:25, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: Your build has many compiler options we have not tested with, do you really need to use them all? -grecord-gcc

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

2021-09-28 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 28/09/2021 15:25, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 14:00, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: [..] my apologies, the information above is incorrect. Qt 5.15.2 is the latest 5.15 release, I was confusing the 5.12 releases with the 5.15 releases. I am using 5.15.2 on Linux

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

2021-09-28 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 27/09/2021 18:21, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: On 27/09/2021 18:12, Tomasz Kłoczko via wsjt-devel wrote: On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 17:16, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: We are pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) release of WSJT-X version 2.5.0. New features are

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Software Change Request

2021-09-28 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
e, but the above may be exactly what you need. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 28/09/2021 06:54, k4cle--- via wsjt-devel wrote: Hello Joe, Bill and Steve, First, thanks for such great work you guys do for us all on WSJT-X.  It's a wonderful program. Second, I would like to request a change to the WS

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

2021-09-27 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 27/09/2021 18:21, Sam W2JDB wrote: Hi Bill, In testing Ver 2.5 in both RC6 and the GA, I noticed a change that could possibly impact those that are unaware. Prior to Ver 2.5 if on the Setting/Reporting tab the "Prompt me to log QSO" checkbox is left unchecked while the "Lo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >