On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote:
> > If anyone has experience compiling under LSB and can help, let me
> > know. I've tried to do this a couple of times in the past and
> > gotten frustrated. I can't stand letting the computer get the best
> > of me so here I am trying it again.
> Can't h
For what it's worth, I'm _again_ trying to get an Linux Standard
Base (LSB) build of Xastir going, but it won't help non-Linux users.
If I can get a minimum install done I'll try a maximum install, then
a bunch of this library stuff can be avoided, at least by one class
of users. People will be
On 17 Nov 2006, at 15:09, Tom Russo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:29:57AM +, we recorded a bogon-
computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
I'm trying your 'cheesy hack' now Tom on the LiveCD. It didn't seem
to work initially as the Makefile in the 'bin' subd
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Tom Russo wrote:
> This whole thing is a pain, and makes me think that the convenience of
> get-maptools.sh is not so convenient --- this is much easier to do by hand
> than to hack the script.
For what it's worth, I'm _again_ trying to get an Linux Standard
Base (LSB) build
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:29:57AM +, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
>
> I'm trying your 'cheesy hack' now Tom on the LiveCD. It didn't seem
> to work initially as the Makefile in the 'bin' subdirectory wasn't
> receiving the 'gcc -
On 17 Nov 2006, at 05:13, Tom Russo wrote:
gcc -O2 -Wall makegeo.o -L/usr/local/lib -L.. -lgeotiff -lproj -
ltiff -ljpeg -lz -lm -o makegeo
/usr/bin/ld: makegeo: hidden symbol `__stack_chk_fail_local' in /
usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS) is referenced by
DSO
/usr/bin/ld: f
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 06:56:32AM -0800, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
>
> On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:39 AM, John Ronan wrote:
>
> >>
> >I'm replying to my own post, which is my bad, but anyways
> >>however trying to compile geotiff I get this
[snip]
The particular error you mention was fixed in GDAL in February, but
that's
after 1.3.1 was released.
get-maptools.sh should probably be updated to snag a later version,
or folks
with bleeding edge GNU compilers will have to do more things manually.
Thanks Tom,
I dropped back to 6
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Tom Russo wrote:
> The particular error you mention was fixed in GDAL in February, but that's
> after 1.3.1 was released.
>
> get-maptools.sh should probably be updated to snag a later version, or folks
> with bleeding edge GNU compilers will have to do more things manually.
A
On 3 Nov 2006, at 01:40, Steven Friis wrote:
Which takes up more/less room?
Z
Thats a good question, I'd guess that using as many of the 'packages
as possible'.
Here's where I got so far (Now I'm not saying what I've done is
correct, just that its worked for me).
I went back to Ubuntu
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:28:10PM +, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
>
> Now.. to make things easy for myself I edited
> get-maptools.sh
>
> ALL=" http://dl.maptools.org/dl/shapelib/shapelib-1.2.10.tar.gz\
> http://dl.maptools
Which takes up more/less room?
Z
John Ronan wrote:
That then begs the question,
Would it be better to install the -dev packages and work from there..
or go completely from source (and use the script)?
Suggestions?
On 1 Nov 2006, at 18:19, Steven Friis wrote:
To get much of what you don't
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:39 AM, John Ronan wrote:
I'm replying to my own post, which is my bad, but anyways
however trying to compile geotiff I get this
gcc -O2 -Wall makegeo.o -L/usr/local/lib -L.. -lgeotiff -lproj -
ltiff -ljpeg -lz -lm -o makegeo
/usr/bin/ld: makegeo: hidden symbol `__st
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote:
>
> On 1 Nov 2006, at 22:49, Dick C. Reichenbach wrote:
>
> > I'm working on similar ideas. With the exception is that I wanted
> > to do a FreeSBIE live disc.
> >
> > One of the things that I have mostly done is a script that will
> > automaticly look
I'm replying to my own post, which is my bad, but anyways
however trying to compile geotiff I get this
gcc -O2 -Wall makegeo.o -L/usr/local/lib -L.. -lgeotiff -lproj -
ltiff -ljpeg -lz -lm -o makegeo
/usr/bin/ld: makegeo: hidden symbol `__stack_chk_fail_local' in /
usr/lib/libc_nonshared.
On 1 Nov 2006, at 22:49, Dick C. Reichenbach wrote:
I'm working on similar ideas. With the exception is that I wanted
to do a FreeSBIE live disc.
One of the things that I have mostly done is a script that will
automaticly look up your rough QTH based on your callsign.
So input your call a
I'm working on similar ideas. With the exception is that I wanted to do
a FreeSBIE live disc.
One of the things that I have mostly done is a script that will
automaticly look up your rough QTH based on your callsign. So input
your call and the script automaticly puts that into the xastir.cnf
Suggestions?
I'm not a "normal" user by any means (keep quiet if you all of a
sudden thought of other realms where this is true...), but I of
_course_ have an opinion:
What I tend to do is use whatever packages are available for the
system if they will work for me, else I deinstall those that d
On 1 Nov 2006, at 18:49, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2006, at 9:53 AM, John Ronan wrote:
I'm quite amazed that Ubuntu would ship with a bleeding-edge
autoconf and
a fossilized automake. Go figure.
Me too..
To answer Bob's post.. yes.. I tried, but there aren't any
alternatives avai
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote:
> That then begs the question,
>
> Would it be better to install the -dev packages and work from there..
> or go completely from source (and use the script)?
>
> Suggestions?
I'm not a "normal" user by any means (keep quiet if you all of a
sudden thought of o
On 1 Nov 2006, at 18:30, Stephen Brown Jr wrote:
"I'm hoping to use it to build a ubuntu xastir livecd (we should
probably discuss a common set of features on the list) its not
starting out well :)"
I totally support that idea, in fact I have toyed with the idea of
creating an Ubuntu
That then begs the question,
Would it be better to install the -dev packages and work from there..
or go completely from source (and use the script)?
Suggestions?
On 1 Nov 2006, at 18:19, Steven Friis wrote:
To get much of what you don't have working, in the xastir
directory, cd into scrip
On Nov 1, 2006, at 9:53 AM, John Ronan wrote:
I'm quite amazed that Ubuntu would ship with a bleeding-edge
autoconf and
a fossilized automake. Go figure.
Me too..
To answer Bob's post.. yes.. I tried, but there aren't any
alternatives available...
I'm upgrading to edgy right now and
"I'm hoping to use it to build a ubuntu xastir livecd (we should probably
discuss a common set of features on the list) its not starting out well
:)"
I totally support that idea, in fact I have toyed with the idea of creating
an Ubuntu ham radio version CD that is installable with commonly us
To get much of what you don't have working, in the xastir directory, cd
into scripts. There is a script there that will install in the proper
the map tools. It is called get-maptools.sh.
Z
Now, I'm on dinner cooking duty.. so I have to get out of here.
thus far... (I'll make it into somethi
I'm quite amazed that Ubuntu would ship with a bleeding-edge
autoconf and
a fossilized automake. Go figure.
Me too..
To answer Bob's post.. yes.. I tried, but there aren't any
alternatives available...
Now, I'm on dinner cooking duty.. so I have to get out of here.
thus far... (I'll ma
I haven't upgraded to Ubuntu 6.10 yet, but 6.06 includes several
versions of automake, including 1.9.6. The package name is
automake1.9 and this works fine with Xastir.
Bob, N7XY
On Nov 1, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Tom Russo wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:24:09PM +, we recorded a bogon-
co
HI Tom,
On 1 Nov 2006, at 16:35, Tom Russo wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:24:09PM +, we recorded a bogon-
computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources/xastir$ aclocal --version
aclocal (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
That's really old, indicating
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:35:19AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:24:09PM +, we recorded a bogon-computron
> collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources/xas
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:24:09PM +, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources/xastir$ aclocal --version
> aclocal (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
That's really old, indicating a very outdated automake package.
> [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
I got this when I tried to bootstrap
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources/xastir$ ./bootstrap.sh
6) Removing autom4te.cache directory...
5) Running aclocal...
4) Running autoheader...
3) Running autoconf...
2) Running automake...
automake: configure.ac: installing `./install-sh'
a
31 matches
Mail list logo
