BTW, I don't know if this was mentioned already, but if you're having
a problem with diacritic placement due to your fonts not having proper
anchor points, you can try using the SIL unicode fonts, which have
proper anchor points, as well as a large repertoire of pre-composed
glyphs (Charis SIL in p
I second looking through xunicode.sty. Most of the tipa commands are
the same, although a couple were altered, as precedence was given to
the math symbols (I think). The comments in file explain why a
particular command was assign to a particular character in these
cases, and IIRC, tell you what co
Hello Daniel,
On 30/10/2011, at 21:41, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore wrote:
>>> With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want?
>>> c\textsubring{b}c
>
> On ctan at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/xunicode
> there is no documen
On Oct 30, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
>
>
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, I think little people need more then than what XeTTeX acctually
>>> provides...
>>
>> "640kb ought to be enough for
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote:
Actually, I think little people need more then than what XeTTeX acctually
provides...
"640kb ought to be enough for anybody."
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote:
>
> Actually, I think little people need more then than what XeTTeX acctually
> provides...
"640kb ought to be enough for anybody."
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
Le 30/10/2011 17:20, Petr Tomasek a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:29:18PM +0100, Paul Isambert wrote:
Le 30/10/2011 13:20, George N. White III a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny
wrote:
Writing an OpenType layout engine is not a simple task, and you can
judge from the
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 03:29:30AM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
> Are you talking about TeX--XeT bidirectional typesetting algorithm?
Sorry that was a typo, am using a slow connection and a mutt on a server
over ssh...
> No, It has several major bugs and it is not perfect for RTL typesetting (ok
>
Are you talking about TeX--XeT bidirectional typesetting algorithm?
No, It has several major bugs and it is not perfect for RTL typesetting (ok
but not perfect).
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Petr Tomasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:20:19AM -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> > On Su
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:20:19AM -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:25:21PM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
> >> XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload package
> >> offers and I guess
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:29:18PM +0100, Paul Isambert wrote:
> Le 30/10/2011 13:20, George N. White III a écrit :
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny
> wrote:
> >> Writing an OpenType layout engine is not a simple task, and you can
> >> judge from the many years it toke FOSS commu
Le 30/10/2011 13:20, George N. White III a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny
wrote:
> Writing an OpenType layout engine is not a simple task, and you can
> judge from the many years it toke FOSS community to have a really good
> one, HarfBuzz (the name luaotfload is mislea
On 2011-10-28 21:02, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
2011/10/28:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William Adams wrote:
majority of documents are created using GUI tools. What use cases
are better served by batch mode, and in what cases is TeX used by
default because of available GUI tools refuse to play.
Large da
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:25:21PM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
>> XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload package
>> offers and I guess that is why many users still like using xetex instead
>> luatex. I personally
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:25:21PM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
> XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload package
> offers and I guess that is why many users still like using xetex instead
> luatex. I personally believe that it is a bad practice that luaotfload just
> co
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore wrote:
>> With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want?
>> c\textsubring{b}c
On ctan at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/xunicode
there is no documentation about xunicode other than a brief readme. Is
there currently any do
Am 30.10.2011 um 10:11 schrieb Daniel Greenhoe:
> How do I in general put, for example, U+0325 below U+0062,
> while still maintaining proper alignment (e.g. the bottom of the "b"
> (U+0062) with a ring (U+0325) below it is still aligned with the
> bottom of an adjacent "c" (U+0063) with nothing
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore wrote:
> With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want?
> c\textsubring{b}c
>
> or cb0325c (with no extra package).
Yes, both of those work great! Thank you!
Dan
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore wrote:
>
> On 30/10/2011, a
On 30/10/2011, at 8:11 PM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>> With COMBINING RING BELOW, U+0325?
>
> Yes --- How do I in general put, for example, U+0325 below U+0062,
> while still maintaining proper alignment (e.g. the bottom of the "b"
> (U+0062
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> With COMBINING RING BELOW, U+0325?
Yes --- How do I in general put, for example, U+0325 below U+0062,
while still maintaining proper alignment (e.g. the bottom of the "b"
(U+0062) with a ring (U+0325) below it is still aligned with the
bott
Am 30.10.2011 um 02:12 schrieb Daniel Greenhoe:
> For example the "b" with a small circle under it
> (voiceless b) is quite important in Chinese. Any suggestions for
> typesetting glyphs with diacritics?
With COMBINING RING BELOW, U+0325?
--
Greetings
Pete
Engineer: a mechanism for converti
The
> problem is, it's easier to blame luaotfload for its uncertain status
> than to sit down and write a replacement; so please let's not forget
> that without luaotfload LuaTeX wouldn't be different from PDFTeX as far
> as fonts are concerned.
>
>
That was not what I was trying to convey. What
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Paul Isambert wrote:
> Le 30/10/2011 06:25, Vafa Khalighi a écrit :
>
> > XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload
> > package offers and I guess that is why many users still like using
> > xetex instead luatex. I personally believe that
2011/10/30 Zdenek Wagner :
> It depends... In Linux you can define your own xkb map and thus have
> all accents on your keyboard. It is possible to define macros in emacs ...
Thank you for your feedback. However, I was not referring to keyboard
input methods, I meant how do I, for example, create
Le 30/10/2011 06:25, Vafa Khalighi a écrit :
XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload
package offers and I guess that is why many users still like using
xetex instead luatex. I personally believe that it is a bad practice
that luaotfload just copies ConTeXt code, it
25 matches
Mail list logo
