Nearly all PC hardware has a single video (YUV) overlay engine.
Which means it not possible to display more that one overlay video
rectangle at a time. Most hardware also has non-overlay mechanisms
for scaling and displaying YUV data, and many drivers expose
these as Xv adaptors. For example,
Hi guys,
I am interested whether it is possible for multiple clients to use a
single overlay (possibly via the Xv extension)? I am not talking about
multi head video cards that have several overlays - one for each monitor
but instead normal cards. If one application uses Xv, does it occupy it
What about using a single overlay with multiple clients? (3 mplayers for
example)
Best regards:
al_shopov
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi guys,
I checked driver man pages in xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/*/*.man
Almost every driver implements the options:
HWCursor, SWCursor however they are documented differently.
From an end user perspective I would like:
1. Them being the same throughout docs
2. Them being as explicit
The _only_ answer that matters is the
technical/scientific one. End users opinions about how things
Technically and scientifically you are right and I agree with you, but
not everyone has the patience for the scientific side. I as sorry as you
are about this thing, but some magic some times
Kernel modules are not inherently faster. the reason directx (and
openGL) seem so fast on windows is because the manufacturers and MS
tweak the drivers for every last bit of performance. Plus they are
able to utilize interfaces that are not accessable in xfree86 due to IP
concerns. Some xfree86
I'm not quite convinced that that is an objective comparison
however. Was Quake 3 running in both operating systems with the
exact same 3D settings?
Of course not! ;-) I am as skeptical as you are regarding similar tests.
However - a demonstration like this helps me when proving that X is not
It does no such thing. It demonstrates that OpenGL on Linux is not slow,
but to run those applications you essentially shut down X. You've
demonstrated nothing about X's performance.
I am not sure I understand what you are saying. To the best of my
knowledge - I used the OpenGL drivers that
Hi guys,
As I know XFree86 4.4 is coming in december. Will you be needing some
help with documentation updates, documentation preparation,
pressreleases etc. non-coding work? I would volunteer to do some things.
Best regards:
al_shopov
___
Devel
Hi guys,
I know XFree 4.4 is coming in December. Is there any need of
Documentation updates, pressrelease preparation etc.?
Anything that I can help with in this aspect?
al_shopov
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brett,
It is a wonderful thing that ISS is switching over to free software OS.
Actually I am going to include this fact in a presentation for the usage
of free software in business environments here in Bulgaria.
About your problems with the Adobe font:
XFree86 has a CVS server that
Cyrillic repertoire is indeed important.
A lot of cyrillic glyphs look exactly the same as some Latin one -
for example A, E, C (but it is s in cyrillic), B (ve) etc.
Actually cyrillic is the repertoire most easily implemented if one has
the Latin counterparts (if you compare
for example Greek,
12 matches
Mail list logo
