So when you disabled the setting does it ask for a password now?
Bill
>--
>From: CR Little[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:50 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
>
>both servers are running Xmail 1.9
>- Original Messa
both servers are running Xmail 1.9
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
> By default EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 is enabled. You are probably POPing mail
> before sending
By default EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 is enabled. You are probably POPing mail
before sending so it doesn't ask you for the username. To confirm that
you are secure take the # out from before EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 and that
will disable that method of authenticating you. Now you should have
problems sendin
Liron Newman wrote:
> You're correct, but there's one thing you can't ignore: If it's /your/
> setting that causes the mail not to get where it should, then the users
> are going to say it's /your/ problem. And I got this even from the most
> tech-savvy of them.
>
> I feel I should give the
I have smtprelay.tab empty and "AllowSmtpVRFY" "1", and
#"EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "0"
in server.tab
My mail server doesn't ask for a username and password when sending mail.
But I do however have have another server setup the exact same way and it
askes for a username and password when send
I have smtprelay.tab empty and "AllowSmtpVRFY" "1", and
#"EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "0"
in server.tab
My mail server doesn't ask for a username and password.
But I do however have have another server setup the exact same way and it
askes for a username and password when sending mail?
Any Ideas? sm
Well regardless it's not needed as xmail will check mailusers.tab first
before smtpauth.tab. So if your user is in mailuser.tab you don't need
to put them in smtpauth.tab. The only reason you would want to use
smtpauth is if you want to enable someone to relay through your server
that doesn't hav
Bill Healy wrote:
>You don't want to use SMTPAUTH.TAB that will affect any other mail
>servers trying to send you messages as well. All you need to do is empty
>the smtprelay.tab file or just put in your local LAN subnets and you are
>done. Have your users turn ON send Authentication for Outgoin
I changed my password, and it seems to work now. Doesn't it seem odd
that an incorrect password gets a "-00171 Resource lock entry not found"
error? Anyway, thanks for the ideas guys.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Bill Healy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:2
You don't want to use SMTPAUTH.TAB that will affect any other mail
servers trying to send you messages as well. All you need to do is empty
the smtprelay.tab file or just put in your local LAN subnets and you are
done. Have your users turn ON send Authentication for Outgoing mail so
that if they
I believe that is caused by a missing directory. Check that you have all
the directories specified in Part 7 of
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmaildoc.htm
If you do have them all then what where you trying to do when you got
the error?
Bill
>--
>From: Williams, Kevin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTE
You're correct, but there's one thing you can't ignore: If it's /your/
setting that causes the mail not to get where it should, then the users
are going to say it's /your/ problem. And I got this even from the most
tech-savvy of them.
I feel I should give the best service to my users, and the
Liron schrieb:
> Hello everybody,
> I see your discussions of spam blacklists, and I want to ask you this:
> Haven't you had complaints about messages that /should/ get through not
> doing so?
> When I used ORBS and MAPS and all of those, I had a lot of complaints
> from various people tha
I place the IPs of know spammers in my spammers.tab
and the email/domains in spam-address.tab
Rather than have Xmail just delete or refuse these emails,
I would like to automatically forward them to an email
Account for review or forward them to SpamCop for reporting.
I don't see a way to do th
> And where is FOO & BAR going to get it's mail from? Locally or at the
> central server? Or on both -since they have two mailboxes- ???
I was thinking about letting the remote mailserver fetch the mailboxes
up from the main mailserver... What would you suggest?
>
> I think that you are makin
We've got that item already posted :=20
Original message came from S=F6nke Ruempler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| > -00171 Resource lock entry not found
| =20
| We often got that error if we typed in wrong login data. check your
ctrlaccounts.tab if password is encrypted, | remember format:
| =20
| "
Hello,
Can anyone explain to me the error "-00171 Resource lock entry not
found"? And how to fix it? I'm trying to write a Control Client in Java,
and I get the above error on my Win32 install of XMail 1.10. The same
Java class files get "+0 OK" on my Linux install of XMail 1.10. I've
alread
And where is FOO & BAR going to get it's mail from? Locally or at the
central server? Or on both -since they have two mailboxes- ???
I think that you are making things more complicated than needed.
Have one mail-server (centrally) dealing with in- and outbound traffic.
Locally have a mail-server
Hello all!
I've got to implement a server for a particular situation.
I've got some remote sites connecting to my central MAIN LAN.
IN this MAIN LAN I house the mailserver of our company, which is quite
large.
I want to install "local" mailservers in our remote offices, so that
they don't have t
19 matches
Mail list logo
