[xmail] [RemoveSpoolErrors]?

2003-02-14 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo, In the Readme is stated: [RemoveSpoolErrors] Indicate if mail has to be removed or stored in 'froz' directory after a failure in delivery or filtering. And I read in the ChangeLog from 1.9: = Fixed a bug that resulted in XMail

[xmail] Re: [RemoveSpoolErrors]?

2003-02-14 Thread Sönke Ruempler
messages? If not, what do I need to set to not create frozen messages? RemoveSpoolErrors==1 means, frozen messages are not created. but imho that does not affect bounced emails. davide? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: [RemoveSpoolErrors]?

2003-02-14 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Sönke schrieb: messages? If not, what do I need to set to not create frozen messages? RemoveSpoolErrors==1 means, frozen messages are not created. Thanks. but imho that does not affect bounced emails. davide? Hmm, lets see if the number of frozen messages decreases now for me. Gerrit

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: SV: Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread Frederik Gallon
Consider 2 days work to having your xmail config changed every week ??? My chedule does not allow for this kind of workload. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Niklas Wikman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Verzonden: vrijdag 14 februari 2003 10:51 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail]

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
Hejsan Niklas. - Original Message - From: Niklas Wikman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: saltstorm.xmail Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:11 PM Subject: [xmail] SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon On Windows? I found some information, but it looked like a two day job to fix the

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread Frederik Gallon
Super cool ! Will check that right away ;-) Frederik -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Newsmirror [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Verzonden: vrijdag 14 februari 2003 14:59 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon =20 =20 =20 Hejsan Niklas.

[xmail] OT: Filter to add footer?

2003-02-14 Thread Liron Newman
Hello folks, I'm looking for a filter for XMail that will add a footer defined by me to messages that pass through it. The tricky part is that I need it to be able to handle multipart/alternative MIME messages and add the footer to all the parts, and I also want to be able to define one

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread co
Hello Newsmirror, Do you have any opinion about the workload on a NT when using the spamassassin perl modules instead of the binary? I am thinking: the binarys must make the spam handling rather fast but if i use the NT perl module i will probably notice

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
Christian, Hello Newsmirror, Do you have any opinion about the workload on a NT when using the spamassassin perl modules instead of the binary? I am thinking: the binarys must make the spam handling rather fast but if i use the NT perl module i will

[xmail] Re: still a problem with psync

2003-02-14 Thread Mircea Ciocan
On a side note, but quite important IMHO: RFC822 (http://rfc.net/rfc822.html) was obsoleted by newer RFC 2822 (http://rfc.net/rfc2822.html) that specifies some new stuff about headers and so. Probabely not much difference but worth a read. Mircea C. Davide

[xmail] Re: 1.14-pre01 ...

2003-02-14 Thread Michael Harrington
Davide, Thank you thank you thank you thank you! The filters processing is MUCH better than the old one. The new format solves many of the problems I was facing. Also, the filesize has been a big help to me. *BIG THUMBS UP* -Mike - Original Message - From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL

[xmail] SV: Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread Niklas Wikman
OK, I just tested the proxy solution... and Bang! I had an open relay :-( I'll try this scoop thing tomorrow, thanx Thomas! /Niklas -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Newsmirror [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Skickat: fr 2003-02-14 19:40 Till: [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: 1.14-pre01 ...

2003-02-14 Thread Rolf Boxenstreit
No biggie, but in the Win32 binary, filters.out.tab was inadvertently named Copy of filters.out.tab. - Rolf - Original Message - From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: XMail mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:45 PM Subject: [xmail] 1.14-pre01 ...

[xmail] Re: smtp authorization

2003-02-14 Thread Serbulent Sertoglu
Hi Davide, Thanks for all your helps. (And to all others responding) The problem is resolved it was because of domain defined on multiple dns servers. (An issue with the service provider). Thanks again... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

[xmail] Re: SV: Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
- Original Message - From: Niklas Wikman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: saltstorm.xmail Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:33 AM Subject: [xmail] SV: Re: SV: Re: BCware NoSPAM SMTP Proxy Daemon OK, I just tested the proxy solution... and Bang! I had an open relay :-( I'll try this

[xmail] Re: 1.14-pre01 ...

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
due to this new filter architecture, anyone interested in a filter conversion script to the new format. no big deal, but as I am in the works of fixing this up myslf I thought someone might be interested in a quick turnover. something like: fconv.pl filters.[in|out].tab ... and take it on

[xmail] ! 1.14 spool file format

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
Davide, from changeglog * 'ATTENTION': The internal spool file format is changed with the new line added ( the 1st one ) that contain various message informations. Filters that rely on the internal spool file format must be changed to match the new structure.

[xmail] Re: ! 1.14 spool file format

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
Info Data [ 1th line ] SmtpDomain [ 2nd line ] SmtpMessageID [ 3rd line ] MAIL FROM:... [ 4th line ] RCPT TO:... [ 5th line ] MAIL-DATA [ 6th line ] ... ok, sorry, had a few beers, missed that one. didn't expect an

[xmail] Re: ! 1.14 spool file format

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
You should't care about the XMail spool header. You should read up to reading a line with MAIL-DATA. The real RFC822 message will follow. actually I do care alot, the Scope parsing routine does indeed, if MAIL_FROM or RCPT_TO are undefined by argument it'll drag info from the 2nd and 3rd

[xmail] Re: ! 1.14 spool file format

2003-02-14 Thread Newsmirror
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Newsmirror wrote: You should't care about the XMail spool header. You should read up to reading a line with MAIL-DATA. The real RFC822 message will follow. actually I do care alot, the Scope parsing routine does indeed, if MAIL_FROM or RCPT_TO are