I could be wrong, but try reversing it... setup your allows before your
denies. Just a thought.
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Nepomucky Radek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:33 PM
Subject: [xmail] ctrl.ipmap and localhost question
>
Hi everybody,
I'm new to XMail and I have a small problem.
I'm trying to secure access to CtrlCntl Xmail administration - I want to
restrict access to specific set of IP addresses. I think I understand the
format of ctrl.ipmap.tab file and I'm able to configure everything I want
except the access
Davide,
The pop3 links interval is set by the command line, for ALL links.
Is there a possibility that this can be set or overridden for a particular
link.
I have a need to reduce the number of times a particular link is polled, but
not all of them.
At the moment I can only increase the interval
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, webmaster wrote:
>
> I was sniffing my network with ethereal and noticed that all pop passwords
> were sent in clear text. Is there any thing I can do to prevent this?
Yes, XMail supports APOP. Or you can use SPOP3 with stunnel.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
yes, in the readme (doco) search for EnableAuthSMTP-POP3
Rob :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Liam MacKenzie
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] POP before SMTP
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
Is POP before SMTP Authentication possible with Xmail?
If so, where do I look to configure it?
Cheers,
Liam MacKenzie
Global Z-Data
165 Melbourne Street
South Brisbane QLD 4069
Mobile: 0403 615 103
Phone: 3846 4222
Fax:3846 0953
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
not really - that's the RFC.
you can use apop or pop over ssl, but if you don't have control over the
mua, then mostly that's a hassle because you get dumb support calls.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of webmaster
> Sent: Thursday, July
I was sniffing my network with ethereal and noticed that all pop passwords
were sent in clear text. Is there any thing I can do to prevent this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help"
Hi,
No problems.
FreeBSD 5.0
Good vacation!
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Beau E. Cox wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "XMail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:45 PM
> Subject: [xmail] 1.17-pre01 for Unix users
Got ya.. after it was restarted it's running well again. I'll do gdb stuff
once it starts giving me the same issue again.
Sincerely,
Scott Pakula
Smoothco.com
--- Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The machine isn't under a high l
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The machine isn't under a high load, i only use this for about 20-30 email
> accounts. However when I executed that command, it triggered XMail to start
> hoging up a ton of CPU and Memory like it was before.
No, I meant that you have to have the
The machine isn't under a high load, i only use this for about 20-30 email
accounts. However when I executed that command, it triggered XMail to start
hoging up a ton of CPU and Memory like it was before.
Sincerely,
Scott Pakula
Smoothco.com
--- Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> O
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> oops.. sorry about that.
Is the system on high cpu/mem load under this snapshot ?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help"
oops.. sorry about that.
here's the output
Attaching to program: /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail, process 43748
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libkvm.so.2...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++
I have had similar probs while using UebiMiau/XMail 1.11&1.12 (Currently
using 1.15 but I don't use the web client much now, so I don't know if it
has gone away.)
I couldn't reproduce, so I haven't told the list.
Rob :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Am I doing this correctly?
> >
> > su-2.05b# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail /var/run/XMail.pid
>
> No, the second parameter is the PID number. This is ok :
>
> # gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail `cat /v
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Am I doing this correctly?
>
> su-2.05b# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail /var/run/XMail.pid
No, the second parameter is the PID number. This is ok :
# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail `cat /var/run/XMail.pid`
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Am I doing this correctly?
su-2.05b# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail /var/run/XMail.pid
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Where would you want me to put info threads before?
Run it inside gdb login, the show me the output.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: s
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I recompiled, and restarted XMail with the -g flag, and removing stripping.
> However when I attempt to do the gdb, this is what i'm getting.
>
> su-2.05b# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail /var/run/XMail.pid
>
> GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
> Copyright 1998
Where would you want me to put info threads before?
Sincerely,
Scott Pakula
Smoothco.com
--- Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Doesn't seem so.
> >
> > Could you :
>
I recompiled, and restarted XMail with the -g flag, and removing stripping.
However when I attempt to do the gdb, this is what i'm getting.
su-2.05b# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail /var/run/XMail.pid
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covere
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Doesn't seem so.
>
> Could you :
>
> 1) Edit Makefile.bsd to remove file stripping and to add -g to compile flags
>
> 2) Stop XMail
>
> 3) Replace XMail binary
>
> 4) Start XMail
>
> 5) Run : `g
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Doesn't seem so.
Could you :
1) Edit Makefile.bsd to remove file stripping and to add -g to compile flags
2) Stop XMail
3) Replace XMail binary
4) Start XMail
5) Run : `gdb PATH-TO-XMAIL-BIN XMAIL-PID`
6) Do a `bt` from inside gdb
- Davi
Doesn't seem so.
su-2.05b# ls -al
total 360
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Jul 16 17:26 .
drwx-- 15 root wheel 1024 Jul 16 17:25 ..
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 1050 Jul 6 19:30 pop3-20030706
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 4000 Jul 8 15:27 pop3-20030708
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root wh
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> After running the new xmail for a few more days, it seems to be causing the
> same issue as before.
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 41873 root 60 0 568M 91864K RUN791:36 98.24% 98.24% XMa
After running the new xmail for a few more days, it seems to be causing the
same issue as before.
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
41873 root 60 0 568M 91864K RUN791:36 98.24% 98.24% XMail
I'm running freebsd 4.8, and i'm not running any extra
Here are the options you have
Within server.tab:
[EnableAuthSMTP-POP3]
Enable SMTP after POP3 authentication (default on).
With this option whenever a user connects to check his mail (POP3) he is
authenticated for a small period of time to send mail from his IP with SMTP
to relay messages.
Y
Could you give me the example how to do it in detail?
Cause I want to make sure it safe, otherwise I would get another security
ticket from Spamcop.
Thanks,
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Joakimsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:12
Why bother with all that? Just use optional SMTP auth + pop3 before smtp
auth. It works and its just as secure.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Multisoft Solution
Enviado el: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:57 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [xma
I couldn't test again & again with abuse.net, so I telnet to
relay-test.mail-abuse.org
The all test results are "...relay denied..." when I used
SMTPRELAY.tab
"205.xxx.xxx.0" "255.255.255.0"
The SMTP.IPMAP.tab content still same:
"0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "ALLOW"1
1. Is it possible if spammer through
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Multisoft Solution wrote:
>
> I am pretty new in XMail and I do testing in Linux RedHat 9.1
> I got a message from our ISP that SPAMCOP told our XMail testing server has
> become spammers server/open relay I guess.
> Yesterday I close the open relay through a change at:
> SMT
Hi,
I am pretty new in XMail and I do testing in Linux RedHat 9.1
I got a message from our ISP that SPAMCOP told our XMail testing server has
become spammers server/open relay I guess.
Yesterday I close the open relay through a change at:
SMTPRELAY.tab
"205.xxx.xxx.0" "255.255.255.0"
and I test
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote:
>
> Yup, there is but this is using chroot to accomplish this.
> Should this not be a default that xmail runs as another user?
Try compartment then :
http://www.suse.de/~marc/compartment.html
with CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Hamilton Thurgood wrote:
>
> Davide
>
> I'll go through whats happening to my Xmail I'll add my .tab files added to the end
> of
> this email.
> The scenario is I have defined in internal e-mail server name as marl.home and
> have configured an extalias.tab file (see below)
Yup, there is but this is using chroot to accomplish this.
Should this not be a default that xmail runs as another user?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: 16 July 2003 07:36 PM
To: XMail mailing list
Subject: [xmail] Re
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Bob Hugel wrote:
>
> A Suggestion...
>
> I am running 1.15.. and had a heck of a time getting the filters to work.
> The readme file is vague when it comes to the placement of the
> filters.in.tab / filters.out.tab files.
>
> I suggest that the readme should read something li
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have XMail run as another user other than root on Unix
> Systems? IE xmail.
>
> Ie. Start XMail up as root, bind to the required privileged ports, then
> fork to a non-root user.
Look at the XMail home page. There should be
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Tim Christensen wrote:
> actually that doesn't help me because the misconfigured installations still
> have that behaviour that the large mails gets lost without anyone noticing
> unless i check the smail logs and see that it doesn't work. exchanging the
> executable and rest
At 6:33 + 7/16/03, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>.. How would you setup the xmail box in order to administrer your own users
>on-site ? And more specifically how would you use the MX record pointing
>to the site ?
As someone else has suggested, there are PHP interfaces which work
quite well, avail
At 10:31 7/16/2003, Informazioni wrote:
>cannot. All users send email from internal LAN (192.168.45.0/24), and
>contact the mail server through a Watchguard firewall. All Lan clients
>appear to the mail server as coming from the same address (192.168.20.254,
>the firewall DMZ ip address), and the m
Hi,
Sorry to bother the list but Jesko Mägle wrote to me about my Xmail AV
filter (linked on xmailserver.org) and I can't answer him because of this :
###
[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[551 Server access forbidden by your IP]
[<01>] Error sending message [1058364330645.1916.digi
A Suggestion...
I am running 1.15.. and had a heck of a time getting the filters to work.
The readme file is vague when it comes to the placement of the
filters.in.tab / filters.out.tab files.
I suggest that the readme should read something like this..
-
Filter se
Hi,
Is it possible to have XMail run as another user other than root on Unix
Systems? IE xmail.
Or possibly to at least run as a non-root user with in the domains dir and
to write mail to disk as a non root user.
Ie. Start XMail up as root, bind to the required privileged ports, then
fork to
Hi,
Is it possible to have XMail run as another user other than root on Unix
Systems? IE xmail.
Ie. Start XMail up as root, bind to the required privileged ports, then
fork to a non-root user.
--
Kind Regards
Richard Mayhew
Splash Internet and Networking Consultants CC
http://www.splash
Hi to everybody.
I'm experiencing troubles with a Xmail server (1.15). Some users sometimes
cannot relay through the server. This behaviour is random: not all users are
affected, and those users sometimes can relay through the server, sometimes
cannot. All users send email from internal LAN (19
Hi Davide!
We figured out why this delivery fails with deletion of the mail , no smail
logging and no error messages.
The delivery in our scenario is actually a custom domain processing, when i
deleted the custom test.visoo.de.tab file
with "smtprelay""172.17.1.6" in it and then added th
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 19:22
>An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Betreff: [xmail] Re: Large mail delivery fails without notification
>
>
>
>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Tim Christensen wrote:
>
>> Hi Davide!
>>
>> I did l
Davide
Replace abc@ with owen.weathers@ and bde@ with
hamilton.thurgood@
Hamilton
On 15 Jul 2003 at 10:35, Davide Libenzi wrote
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Hamilton Thurgood wrote:
>
> Davide
>
> I'll go through whats happening to my Xmail I'll add my .tab files added to the
49 matches
Mail list logo
