[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

Hi Davide, This is the morning report of xmail ;-) dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: >> Running from around 8pm.. Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can. XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped ==2805== discard syms in

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: >> Running from around 8pm.. Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can. I will for the night.. See you tomorrow.. >> ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > Running from around 8pm.. Very good, leave it running if you can. > ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 4 > ==31314==at 0x40218D6C: my_malloc (vg_libpthread.c:263) > ==31314==by 0x4021A6FF: get_or_allocate_

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

Running from around 8pm.. ==31314== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==31314== discard syms in /lib/libnss_dns-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==31314== discard syms in /lib/libresolv-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==31314== ==31314== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppress

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 20:44:33, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: Davide> Those are all harmless/one-time leaks. Please let XMail to run a little Davide> bit more. I understood, it's running now til 7 pm. :-) Davide> Did XMail process any message during the ru

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > I did it again, may be the clean was not correct ! > > Are you agree with this result ? The function names are showed! > > XMail is running now under valgrind in Telnet session. > > > > I juste stopped a few secs to copy these informations : Tho

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

I did it again, may be the clean was not correct ! Are you agree with this result ? The function names are showed! XMail is running now under valgrind in Telnet session. I juste stopped a few secs to copy these informations : XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped ==31051== discard syms in /

[xmail] Re: How to specify a multi-line reject message for Xmail?

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Tracy wrote: > I am attempting to modify the SmtpMsgIPBanSpammers (and similar) messages > in server.tab to allow me to return a multi-line message in response to > such an error. Specifically, I want to return something along the lines of: > 550-5.7.1 Your IP address has be

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said : > > Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > >> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! > >> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said : Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: >> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! >> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to >> keep running before to read interesting result

[xmail] How to specify a multi-line reject message for Xmail?

I am attempting to modify the SmtpMsgIPBanSpammers (and similar) messages in server.tab to allow me to return a multi-line message in response to such an error. Specifically, I want to return something along the lines of: 550-5.7.1 Your IP address has been found in the headers of spam sent to thi

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > > samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said : > > Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8 > Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md > > > When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory > usi

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote: > This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! > Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to > keep running before to read interesting result ? You have to use the debug executable, like I described insid

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said : Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8 Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory using by the process This number seems to be normal so run

[xmail] Re: SNDRIP=ERDNS - RDNS Check - How to explain?

Check the docs: [SMTP-RDNSCheck] Indicate if XMail must do an RDNS lookup before accepting a incoming SMTP connection. If 0, the check is not performed; if 1 and the check fails, the user receives a 'server use forbidden' at MAIL_FROM time; if -S (S > 0) and the check fails, a delay of S seconds b

[xmail] Re: To much memory ?

Dear Davide, This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) ! Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to keep running before to read interesting result ? ==30326== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap() ==30326== discard syms in

[xmail] Re: SNDRIP=ERDNS - RDNS Check - How to explain?

Search for it on google http://www.google.de/search?q=SMTP+RDNS+Check&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=de&meta= Michael > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lev Shamilov > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 9:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [

[xmail] Re: SNDRIP=ERDNS - RDNS Check - How to explain?

OK, again: The error message says: "The sender's domain is listed in SMTP-RDNSCheck or in CustMapsList " Questions: SMTP-RDNS Check agains WHAT Where is the domain or service I know where is listed "CustMapsList" URL but where is RDNS??? What am I missing ? My question is what to sa