On Friday 12 March 2004 04:55 pm, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 12:10 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > ssin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> > version=2.63
> >
> >
> > This is 1.18-pre08 and i
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 12:10 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
>
> Running pre07 since last night. Is there is problem with filter
> return code 7 (message changed)? It looks like messages are not
> reco
Not likely as these are all windows servers but I can try and get a libpcap
capture from them if you think that would be helpful. I would like to know
that the exchange server is sending the ID and password correctly myself...
-Original Message-
From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
On Friday 12 March 2004 12:10 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> ssin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
>
> This is 1.18-pre08 and it is running fine on xmailserver.org (low load).
> Once again, I'd ap
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the list broken?
Duh?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the list broken?
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:21 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote:
>
> > I am configuring the exchange 2000 SMTP conne
Jason - I'm surprised there wasn't a burst of feedback on the list about
formatting mail. I am no expert, but there has been much discussion here
about that, and the RFC's that govern their structure. I imagine you are
thinking of dropping your notices into the xmail local pickup directory -
whic
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote:
> I am configuring the exchange 2000 SMTP connector to authenticate against
> the server as it is what is forwarding mail.
Can you get the output of "tcpdump -X -x" during the login transaction?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
That's exactly what I thought, I was trying to understand were I was =
wrong and I've tried searching in SA buglist and in this mailing list =
archive, but after looking at SA code (even the latest, 3.0) I realized =
there was no code to parse XMail's version of the received header, =
there's somet
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, POPOLI Guido wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> That would be great, is there any specific reason why you choose to =
> include the port parameter in the first place? Debug? BTW, is this a =
> FAQ?
>
> Until then there is anyone that can help modifying the received.pm =
> module to mee
Hi Davide,
That would be great, is there any specific reason why you choose to =
include the port parameter in the first place? Debug? BTW, is this a =
FAQ?
Until then there is anyone that can help modifying the received.pm =
module to meet Xmail's criteria? It should be easy... To somebody who =
This is 1.18-pre08 and it is running fine on xmailserver.org (low load).
Once again, I'd appreciate testing on Linux/BSD/Solaris, expecially on
machine with a fair load and using external processing (filters, etc):
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
- Davide
-
To unsubscrib
Thats a GREAT idea. Perhaps you could parse the virus name into the email
as well. We did this with our previous AV system, and it worked very well
for us. Unfortunately, a script-based solution is much slower, and demands
to much overhead for the volume of mails being scanned.
Tony
- Orig
I've decided that I am going to pass on the header and a message (with
modified subject line) to virus recipients saying that a virus was
intercepted. This way if there is a false positive they can let me know
and I can go and check the keep folder for them. It is also nice to
'advertise' tha
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, POPOLI Guido wrote:
> I'm having a problem with Spamassassin 2.63 and XMail 1.17. When SA
> tries to parse the XMail Received header of an incoming message it gives
> a "received-header: unknown format:" error and fail to get the "from" IP
> address.
>
> I've been trying to f
I am configuring the exchange 2000 SMTP connector to authenticate against
the server as it is what is forwarding mail.
-Original Message-
From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentcia
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with Spamassassin 2.63 and XMail 1.17. When SA
tries to parse the XMail Received header of an incoming message it gives
a "received-header: unknown format:" error and fail to get the "from" IP
address.
I've been trying to find a solution but haven't found anything hel
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > Here it is the 1.18-pre06:
> >
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre06.tar.gz
> >
> > I really need this to be tested on all Unix-based systems, expecially the
> > ones using heavy external programs like filters,
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Here it is the 1.18-pre06:
>
> http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre06.tar.gz
>
> I really need this to be tested on all Unix-based systems, expecially the
> ones using heavy external programs like filters, mailproc->external, etc...
Are there specific things to loo
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote:
> "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0"
> "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0"
>
> I get these types of entries when I try to use the pop user I created for
> this test on the server to ser
Here it is the 1.18-pre06:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre06.tar.gz
I really need this to be tested on all Unix-based systems, expecially the
ones using heavy external programs like filters, mailproc->external, etc...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have allready running one Xmail server on RH8 for more than a year and
> now I have configured another one on RH7.3. My config is the same as old
> but when I do command: ps -All I get a lot of instances of Xmail running
> compare to the old
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Riaz Oosman wrote:
>
> >If XMail accept a message from you *and* the sender email address is
> >correct, XMail always sends bounces in case the remote server will bounce.
>
> Hi Davide,
>
> I agree with you that if Xmail receives an error message from a remote server,
> it
"" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0"
"" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0"
I get these types of entries when I try to use the pop user I created for
this test on the server to server connection
-Original Message-
S=F6nke Ruempler pravi:
>>I have allready running one Xmail server on RH8 for more than a year
>>and now I have configured another one on RH7.3. My config is the same
>>as old but when I do command: ps -All I get a lot of instances of
>>Xmail running compare to the old one where is only one instan
> I have allready running one Xmail server on RH8 for more than a year
> and now I have configured another one on RH7.3. My config is the same
> as old but when I do command: ps -All I get a lot of instances of
> Xmail running compare to the old one where is only one instance of
> Xmail running.
>
Hi!
I have allready running one Xmail server on RH8 for more than a year and
now I have configured another one on RH7.3. My config is the same as old
but when I do command: ps -All I get a lot of instances of Xmail running
compare to the old one where is only one instance of Xmail running.
Am I
huumm, on w2k?
I think that this is hard ;)
I will wait the windows version.
Thank Davide.
Ciao.
Sergio C.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerd=EC 12 marzo 2004 6.21
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: [xmail] Re: smtp.ipprop.tab
On Wed, 10
> Ok up and running here on main and fallback. I will report if
> something happens ;-)
OUH davide, what is this? filters scramble the messages (spamassassin) with
the new version and xmail stops processing smail after a restart and one
minute ...
bad release
running old xmail again.
-
To
29 matches
Mail list logo
