Details here:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=2098&st=0entry11457
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a question:
If the filter runs in filters.post-data.tab it does not examine the messages
that come from pop3links (psync) these single examine the filters in
filters.in.tab, what I must modify so that the filter works there and also
it gives back the message when it finds an extension proh
I didn't realize that. What I do is parse the score so I can let each email
account set the score they wish to use as their personal threshold. I just
assumed you were doing it the same way. Sorry about the confusion.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue regarding SRS is only important if you have mailboxes that =
forward
to another email server. For example, I have customers who host domains
with me and have certain email addresses in their domains forward to
mailboxes at yahoo, hotmail, or aol. If I create SPF records in their
domains
Wow, I hope that's not true. The SPF site leaves me with the impression
that the DNS record checking, Received-SPF header, SMTP AUTH, and SRS
are all pieces which can be implemented in steps and should not fail
when all steps are not yet implemented. I have the impression that if a
server is re
Without SRS and SASL SMTP support, publishing SPF records for your =
domains
can cause problems. One potential problem is with forwarded email. =
Some of
your forwarded email could be blocked by other ISPs if you publish SPF
records without proper SRS support within your email server.
-Origi
Please explain why you think it is not practical to add the SPF record
to your DNS. Publishing an SPF record in your DNS is step 1, and you do
not need to do anything else if you don't feel like it. This just makes
life easier for everyone who receives messages from your domains.
Shiloh Jennin
True, but my script doesn't look at that header, it looks at "X-Spam-Flag",
which hasn't changed.
However, to use virtual configs, you probably tweaked my script to pass the
-u parameter. Maybe something with SA 3.0 changed with how that works. I
would run spamd in debug mode (-D) and check th
There are filters available to do filtering with XMail based on SPF =
data.
However, there are two other important issues to fully supporting SPF. =
One
is SASL SMTP (allowing customers to send email on port 587, but only =
with
SMTP AUTH). You can easily bind XMail's SMTP service to both ports 2
SA3 returns a bit different header than SA2.6x. You need to rewrite the
perl filter to look for "score=" instead of "hits=".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Riaz Oosman
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
There are at least two SPF filters listed on the xmailserver.org home
page, and SpamAssassin 3.0 (which can be used by a filter) included SPF
support.
Tom Banting wrote:
> Has anyone added SPF functionality to xmail?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>
Has anyone added SPF functionality to xmail?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I totally agree that "all messages regardless of whom they are from
or to" should be scanned. But
in the way I look at it it's alot easy'er and better (in my opinion) to
scan as much as you can at the smtp
level. ( in my case I scan for spam , invaild attachments, and soon
virus
At 21.12 11/10/04 +0200, you wrote:
>Thank you Francesco, It indeed worked. Can you tell me what's the different
>between filters*.tabs?
>I want to use the fastest attachment check. No other check (AV, content) is
>used. Shouldn't I use the filters.in or global filters file?
In my own view, the be
14 matches
Mail list logo