--- Larry Azlin wrote:
> But when I have it used sendmail, I don't
> receive the email (in FireFox).
Hi.
Please, try to run the following from the shell and
report the results:
$ export MAIL_ROOT=
$ $MAIL_ROOT/bin/sendmail -f -t
To:
Subject: a simple test
just a simple test
--- Jeff Buehler wrote:
>
> From: buehlertech.net PostMaster
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:49 PM
> To: Jeff Buehler
> Subject: Error sending message
>
[1137780666750.135234560.3ee.banshee.buehlertech.net]
> from [buehlertech.net]
>
> (...)
>
>
>
> From: buehlert
--- Jeff Buehler wrote:
> At any rate, the strange part is that each of the
> messages I sent IS
> from the same email.
No, Jeff. They are from different e-mails. Look at the
subjects, please: test4 and test3.
Regards.
__
--- Jeff Buehler wrote :
> Right now I have XMail set to
> try 10 times, so there
> seem to be 10 emails that are sent to notify the
> sender of the failure.
>
> (...)
> Exchange users that have this problem - XMail is
> running on FreeBSD, but
> a number of Exchange users send through it a
--- Thomas Bresson wrote:
>
> I am able to logon to the mailserver with the user
> accounts I've made, but sending mail or recieving
> mail is impossible. I made a test mailing between
> the accounts, nothing happend. Also I made a test
> by mailing from "outside" to an account on my
> domain.
--- Rosario Pingaro wrote:
> If it is not aveilable what is in your opinion the
> best av filter for linux?
Hi.
I use ClamAV and the post-data filter:
#! /bin/bash
# Parametros: @@FILE
if ! OUT=`/usr/local/bin/clamdscan --no-summary $1`
then
echo "554 Message rejected by ant
--- Adrian Hicks wrote:
> Yes as Leonardo has stated I can use the sendmail
> command in XMail. However this will only work on
> the XMail machine; if I send a message from
> another server using the mail utility the problem
> still exists.
In the hope to be of help, I submit a bash script you
--- Adrian Hicks wrote:
> The options are as follows:
>
> -a Specify additional header fields on the
> command line such as "X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" etc.
Hi.
(This option really doesn't exist in the mail v.8.1.1
included in Fedora Core 4.)
The "From" _header_ field, which is
--- Adrian Hicks wrote:
> This script uses the mail utility and includes an
> extra header for the sender (see below):
>
> begin ---
> mail -s "Spam? / Request for mail access" -a "From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> "$fromsender" < /var/MailRoot/filters/htmlreply.msg
> end ---
>
I don't know Debi
--- garlic breath wrote:
> I dunno how they do itopen relay is closed since
> I have the only entries
> in my smtprelay.tab are "127.0.0.1" "255.0.0.0" and
> "192.168.0.0" "255.255.0.0"
>
> any ideas?
>
Hi.
_Maybe_ a virus, adware etc. in a workstation in your
LAN is sending those messag
--- Adrian Hicks wrote:
> The sender of
> the error message is [EMAIL PROTECTED], not
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi.
Did you "set the postmaster address?":
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server_tab_variables
Regards.
___
Hi.
Mail loop detected sending message from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (please, note
the heading dot):
[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Error=[Mail loop detected]
[<01>] Error sending message
[1135250773994.2355100592.5d26c.xmail.my.domain]
from [my.domain].
--- Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
> That's a great idea, but perhaps not enough. Here in
> Brazil, as in France, the
> law don't allow mail violation.
News about the topic:
"The decision of the TST [brazilian supreme court of
labour] was favourable to HSBC, under the
argumentation that 'the ente
> "domain.net." is not recognized as local, which
> leads to a mail loop. Can anybody confirm this?
Hi.
I have already faced the same problem. I just added an
alias domain: "domain.net" "domain.net.".
Regards.
_
Hi.
We have decided that only local users should be
allowed to send e-mails to local mailing lists, i.e.,
non-local users must not send e-mails to mailing
lists. In simpler words: users that are not allowed to
relay must not be allowed to send e-mails to local
mailing lists.
As all mailing lists m
--- "Edinilson J. Santos" wrote:
> I found that, for some strange reason, our gateway
> (using freebsd) was
> configured to use path mtu discovery
> (net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=1).
> After disabling this option to
> net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0 all emails
> to hotmail.com and msn.com
Although yahoo.com has 4 mx records and each mx record
has 4 A records:
yahoo.com. ... MX 1 mx1.mail.yahoo.com.
yahoo.com. ... MX 5 mx4.mail.yahoo.com.
...
mx1.mail.yahoo.com. ... A 67.28.113.10
mx1.mail.yahoo.com. ... A 67.28.113.11
...
mx4.mail.yahoo.com.
--- John Kielkopf wrote:
> Sorry to go off topic here, but have you tried the
> tests at:
> http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
>
> Using clamdscan in post-data, what tests to you fail
> on, if any?
Oops. I forgot to mention that in my previous mail. It
fails tests #5, 12, 16 and 24. Thankfully, t
--- Leonardo Fogel wrote:
> Once in a while, xmail postmaster get some "Error
> sending message" to yahoo.com.br (aka yahoo.com):
>
>[<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was:
>
>The maximum number of delivery attempts has
>been reached
--- Matic wrote:
> Is the filters.post-data.tab the right place to put
> in a virus scanner?
Hi.
I think so. I think it is the right place because
XMail will close the session imediatelly. If we use
filters.in/out.tab and a sender writes a message to N
recipients, XMail will process N messages
--- jonn ah wrote:
> I was wondering why xmail is not able to read the
> 'password' field in my mysql database if i change it
> from within mysql itself...it still looks for the
> old one even if i restart xmail...unless i change it
> using xmail's cntrl functions i initially
> thought that
--- jonn ah wrote:
> we're using xmail's pop3 and smtp service but when
> we try to send messages to either yahoo or hotmail,
> the messages does not seem to get delivered...
Once in a while, xmail postmaster get some "Error
sending message" to yahoo.com.br (aka yahoo.com):
[<02>] The reaso
--- Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
>
> My guess is that this behaviour is caused by some
> kind of malformed message
> - like missing CRLF at end or maybe mismatched line
> endings in message. This
> usually occurs for spam messages and I currently do
> not have enough samples
> to be sure.
>
Y
--- Sönke Ruempler wrote:
>
> Does XMail resolve the the RDNS of the local IP it
> is bound to? Or does
> it resolve the hostname of the remote IP?
Hi.
Sorry for the delay. It resolves (PTR record) to the
hostname (FQDN) of the local IP address (10.0.1.20),
which is equal to the HeloDomain valu
Hi.
Although I've set the HeloDomain variable in
server.tab, XMail (IP 10.0.1.20) is still doing
reverse lookups (10.0.1.2 is the dns):
# tcpdump -n -p udp port domain
. IP 10.0.1.20.58871 > 10.0.1.2.domain PTR?
20.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa. (40)
. IP 10.0.1.2.domain > 10.0.1.20.58871
--- jonn ah wrote:
>
> So you're using courier-imap's pop3 server and not
> xmail's?
No, I use XMail's POP3 server.
>
> Leonardo Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use XMail and Courier-IMAP too, but I patched
> Courier-IMAP to aute
--- jonn ah wrote:
> I'm running squirrelmail with courier-imap (for
> imap) and xmail (for pop3), i store
> usernames/passwords in a mysql database... i can
> change the password for imap (using squirrelmail's
> mysql plugin) with no problem but with pop3 it does
> not get updated...can anybody
--- Larry Azlin wrote:
> > >
> > > I've modified smtprelay.tab to include the ip at
> my
> > > friend's house, so
> > > it now looks like:
> > >
> > > "192.168.0.0"[TAB]"255.255.0.0"
> > > "xxx.xxx.xxx.0"[TAB]"255.255.255.0"
> > >
Hi, Larry.
I misunderstood you first e-mail. I believed XMail
--- Larry Azlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I run Xmail 1.21 on a SUSE 9.0 box to host my
> personal email
> (azlin.com), and all's well if the laptop running my
> email client
> (Thunderbird) is on my LAN. Recently I've been
> taking the laptop over
> to a friend's house
--- Francesco Vertova wrote:
>
> So another question: why nslookup can retrieve MX
> info and XMail cannot?
> (150.217.1.32 is first in SmartDNSHost line).
>
> >nslookup
> Default Server: dns.unifi.it
> Address: 150.217.1.32
>
> > set type=MX
> > datacomm.iue.it
> Server: dns.unifi.it
--- Francesco Vertova wrote:
>
> any idea why XMail (1.21 Win32) delivers OK to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but fails to
> deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The two have exactly
> the same MX
> records, the only difference being that
> datacomm.iue.it has also an A
> record (is an alias of dns1.iue.it).
I
--- Michael Luke wrote:
> From your own sources:
>
> "But Wong, who co-authored both the SPF and Sender
> ID standards, said
>
> In theory, when all spammers are forced to publish
> SPF records, along with all legitimate e-mail
> senders, *it will be easy* for legitimate companies
> to deve
--- Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > # tcpdump -p -n udp port domain
> > . 10.0.1.20.45848 > 10.0.1.2.domain: 26719+ A?
> > 91.80.222.200.dialups.mail-abuse.org. (54)
>
> XMail uses SmartDNSHost only for MX queries, and
> this looks very like a MAPs query (that is performed
> using the system D
--- Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Leonardo Fogel wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I had changed the SmartDNSHost variable in the
> > server.tab:
> >
> > --- Old value ---
> > SmartDNSHost 200.20.235.49:udp,200.20.235.49:tcp
> >
&
Hi.
>From the syslog I've read:
. XMail[1959]: Filter error (-5): Sender =
Please, does it mean time out?
Thank you.
$ grep -e -5 /usr/src/xmail-1.21/*.h
/usr/src/xmail-1.21/Errors.h:#define ERR_TIMEOUT (-5)
.
_
Hi.
I had changed the SmartDNSHost variable in the
server.tab:
--- Old value ---
SmartDNSHost 200.20.235.49:udp,200.20.235.49:tcp
--- New value ---
SmartDNSHost 10.0.1.2:udp
but XMail used both DNSs until I restarted it.
Regards.
___
--- Orion Productions wrote:
>
> Is it allowed to create subdirectories under the
> mailbox dir of a user?
> For a webmail application, I'd like the users to be
> able to create their own folder structure under
> inbox (just like outlook (express)).
Yes, it is _allowed_, but you need an IMAP se
--- Francesco Vertova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Your problem is that MX records cannot point to
> > CNAMEs and Davide has adhered to the RFC.
>
> Well, I'm not a DNS expert but I would say that in
> this case MX do not point to CNAME: platos, vasos
> and rediris are not CNAME, or I get
--- Francesco Vertova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Did you change your DNS configuration recently?
>
> I've been running XMail for 6 weeks (installed on
> Oct 12) and always used the same config (no
> SmartDNSHost in server.tab).
>
Did the administrator of the DNS server change the RRs
--- Francesco Vertova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> machine.domain runs a POP3 server but no SMTP server
>
> MX records for machine.domain point to
> smtpserver.domain
>
> XMail (1.17, WinNT 4) tries to deliver to
> machine.domain rather than smtpserve
Hi.
Is PSYNC (1.17) supposed to comply with user's quota?
Or, is it supposed to synchronize external and local
accounts even if local mailbox is full?
Thank you.
Yahoo! Mail - o melhor webmail do Brasil
http://mail.yahoo.com.br
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
>
> So one of two biggest problems (are and
> 'double POP after') with
> Courier-IMAP is about to been solved.
>
> Do you have a ready to use patch?
> Or just some drafts? How to implement this patch?
>
> Best regards,
> Mikhail.
Please, find enclosed a patch to XMail-1.17. It solves
the 'doub
--- Michail Tchoudinov wrote:
>
> That's great!
> I do not get any attached files with your mail (did
> you mean file attachments?)
Ecartis has stripped it! I'll send it directly to you.
>
> So one of two biggest problems (are and
> 'double POP after') with Courier-IMAP is about
> to been so
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Michail Tchoudinov wrote:
> >
> > Courier-IMAP looks good, but has troubles with
> > end of lines, and produces double messages
> > to POP after IMAP access.
I have written a _simple_ patch to Courier-IMAP-2.0.0
to solve the problem. Please, find it attached.
XMail POP
--- Richard Mayhew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you would like help with Dovecot IMAP let me
> know.
>
Hi, Richard.
Thank you for the reply.
We use Courier-IMAP because it allows us to write our
own authentication code. This way, we could make
Courier-IMAP authenticate against XMail.
I
> IIRC users already integrated XMail with existing
> IMAP servers. Why don't
> you do the same if Courier does not fit ?
>
Please, which IMAP server do they use?
Many thanks, Davide.
Regards.
What "IIRC" is?
___
Yahoo! GeoCi
Hi.
I installed XMail 1.16 and, recently, Courier-IMAP 2.0
server on a Linux box. Courier-IMAP is an IMAP server.
Unfortunately, however, XMail and Courier-IMAP are not
working well together.
Lines on the mail files XMail create on Maildir/new/
terminate with (DOS format). Courier-IMAP,
however,
47 matches
Mail list logo
