On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> PS: Who is it, that scumbles the messages with these quoted-printable=20
> characters? Is it the ML-software or my User Agent or ...?=20
I think it is Ecartis, but I'm not sure. It could be my Pine too, even if=
=20
I doubt.
- Davide
On Sunday, January 16, 2005 1:16 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Eric Garnice wrote:
>
>> Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you
>> mentio= ned a=20
>> single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude
>> MailRoot from= =20
>>
Yeah, yeah, my butt is stinging. :) That's what happens when you're
forced to work on silly products like Exchange that require 1.5GB of RAM
for 12 users (large message store), and it really starts puking once you
hit the swapfile. It tends to make the rest of your brains go mush.
Thanks fo
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Eric Garnice wrote:
> Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you mentio=
> ned a=20
> single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude MailRoot from=
> =20
> the memory-resident virus scanner. I excluded MailRoot and all mail=20
> instan
XMail - no filters on that server.
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: A question of delivery
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
>
> > I had a smiliar scenario in 1.20 with a
On Saturday 15 January 2005 5:18 pm, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>
> I hope that Eric can extract it ;)
> -
Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you mentio=
ned a=20
single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude MailRoot from=
=20
the memory-resident virus s
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> I had a smiliar scenario in 1.20 with a message once that was sitting in the
> queue, sent the CPU usage to 100% and stopped all mail delivery until i
> cleared out the spool. I may actually still have it sitting around here
> somewhere if you want it
: "Davide Libenzi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: A question of delivery
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=3DCET],
> > Eric Garnice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Saturday, January 15, 2005 10:23 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> You did not send me the message, so if it was a problem with XMail,
> the=20 problem is likely to be still there.
Yes, I deleted the mail in the rush :[
I hope that Eric can extract it ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list
I will have some time to check it out in about 5 hours from now.
Sönke Ruempler said the following on 01/15/2005 03:51 PM:
> Hopefully Eric
>gets the message and we can hunt the bug ;-)
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > If this is true, it is extremely important that I get that message. I
> > find=3D =3D20
> > also very unlikely that XMail does not deliver other messages, since
> > there=3D =3D20
> > are many SMAIL threads on the system. So you should
> If this is true, it is extremely important that I get that message. I
> find= =20
> also very unlikely that XMail does not deliver other messages, since
> there= =20
> are many SMAIL threads on the system. So you should have so many
> "strange"= =20
> messages as the number of SMAIL threads.
Dav
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=3DCET],
> Eric Garnice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>=20
> > One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished
> > committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear alon
On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Eric Garnice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished
> committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear along, I
> installed XMail on a file server in that office and routed all
> o
At 6:33 + 7/16/03, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>.. How would you setup the xmail box in order to administrer your own users
>on-site ? And more specifically how would you use the MX record pointing
>to the site ?
As someone else has suggested, there are PHP interfaces which work
quite well, avail
To administer users look at XMail PHP Administration Interface (XPAI) its
linked on the main xmailserver.org page
The default configuration (IIRC) is to only permit users to relay mail when
it is 1) going to a domain on your server or 2) a user has authenticated
with their username + password. Th
Can I come too?
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:33 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: A Question...
>
> Now that I could buy into :-D=20
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
Now that I could buy into :-D=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:27 PM
To: XMail mailing list
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Charles Frolick wrote:
> I would rather see Davide add more advance SMTP
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Charles Frolick wrote:
> I would rather see Davide add more advance SMTP envelope rejection
> abilities than extended ctrlclnt. To be able to perform basic tests on
> HELO/EHLO, MAIL FROM, and RCPT TO, failed SMTP auth tarpitting or temp
> blocking on IP, things like that.
Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: A Question...
So basically you are agreeing with me?
Shawn=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
On
Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Friday, June 2
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: A Question...
True, but I picked the example that I gave because it was simple to =3D
outline
:) Here are a couple of other
My responses are inline.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: A Question...
True, but I picked the example
s for your favorite scripting or programming environment.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: A Question...
Ok, wh
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: A Question...
Ok, what if when the script was registered it needs to define which =
files it
was going to access? Then the code could add a lock for
Ok, what if when the script was registered it needs to define which =
files it
was going to access? Then the code could add a lock for those files and =
the
release them with the process exits.
Shawn=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
>
> I was thinking more of a plugin as a standalone external application =
> (.exe,
> ..pl, js, etc). Not a DLL concept -- too much of a hassle for stability. =
> If
> you spawn a process and it crashes, it will not take down Xmail. No as =
> for
> the
I was thinking more of a plugin as a standalone external application =
(.exe,
..pl, js, etc). Not a DLL concept -- too much of a hassle for stability. =
If
you spawn a process and it crashes, it will not take down Xmail. No as =
for
the resource locking, that is a more interesting problem -- but
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll admit that there are a few grammatical issues in this one -- =
> let me
> try again :)
>
> Suggestion: =20
> Add a command plug-in concept to the ctrl protocol
>
> Explanation:
> Currently the control protocol supports a list of
Ok, I'll admit that there are a few grammatical issues in this one -- =
let me
try again :)
Suggestion: =20
Add a command plug-in concept to the ctrl protocol
Explanation:
Currently the control protocol supports a list of commands that you
have created. My suggestion would allow
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Hey, here is an odd question, have you ever giving any thought to add a
> filter/plugin concept for the ctrl protocol? I was thinking that it =
> would
> be create to add some custom extension to the ctrl protocol and then =
> allow
> people to add th
Ahh, good point :)
Hey, here is an odd question, have you ever giving any thought to add a
filter/plugin concept for the ctrl protocol? I was thinking that it =
would
be create to add some custom extension to the ctrl protocol and then =
allow
people to add the ones that they want to use by inst
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> You could do it with a filter, couldn't you?=20
Yes, but you won't get a rejection at SMTP session level. You'll get a
notification of missed delivery.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a mes
Davide,
You could do it with a filter, couldn't you?=20
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:05 PM
To: XMail mailing list
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Yevgeni Chukharev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Yevgeni Chukharev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like XMail to deny all incoming e-mail addressed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (e.g., by sending a "Mailbox unavailable" error
> message),
>
> _UNLESS_ this e-mail is sent from a local network (192.168/16).
>
> At the same time, _ALL_
David, any suggestions ?
Louis Solomon
www.SteelBytes.com
- Original Message -
From: "Sönke Ruempler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:57 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: a question about backup MXs and resend timeouts ..
&
In general ... Can you run 2 instances of Xmail?
One MX & one in backup MX?
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: S=F6nke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 januari 2003 10:58
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: a question about ba
> I also saw recent references to -Qt -Qi -Qr. But as far as I see changing
> these will affect both the backup domain, and the primary domain (since
they
> are both part of the same instance of xmail, and these opts appear to
affect
> the whole instance of xmail)
yes, that options are global onl
> Check the archive of this forum ... We have dealt with a lot of issues of
> backup MX cofigs.
done this, and didnt find the answer.
I saw references to setting up a backup MX (did that a couple of days ago
after looking in the archive, using the smtp line in a cust domain .tab)
I also saw rec
Louis,
Check the archive of this forum ... We have dealt with a lot of issues of
backup MX cofigs.
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 januari 2003 7:26
> Aan: XMail mailing list
> Onderwerp: [xmail] a question
39 matches
Mail list logo
