On 3 Oct 2007, at 9:56, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> Hello All...
>
> Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
> for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
> eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
> the
>
> I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
>
>>
>> Never heard about xbmf !?!?
>> No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
>>
>> I missed somethink usefull ?
xbmf was developed to deal with the eMail tail null-byte issue and another
liken brethre
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> >
> > I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
> >
>
> Never heard about xbmf !?!?
> No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
>
> I missed somethink usefull ?
>
> Davide, what is the purpose of this fi
>
> I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
>
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
Davide, what is the purpose of this filter ?
Thanks
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 3:54 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Bounced eMail messags
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 3 Oct 20
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, I should have said that we are running xMail V1.24 at
> >> present -- so I guess I'm saying that our xMail Server V1.24 does NOT
> >> reject the bad destination eMails in the MTA session -- they
>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry, I should have said that we are running xMail V1.24 at
>> present -- so I guess I'm saying that our xMail Server V1.24 does NOT
>> reject the bad destination eMails in the MTA session -- they seem to
>> get queued for later retry delivery
On 4 Oct 2007, at 0:36, K. Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
> When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
> trying to deliver.
> Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
> w
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
> >
> > Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a
> > dictionary for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > etc. Then the eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a
> dictionary for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> etc. Then the eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the
> sender indicating the eMail was NOT del
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello All...
> >
> > Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
> > for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
> > eMail Servers trys to se
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> Hello All...
>
> Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
> for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
> eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
> the eMa
>
> Francis Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:37 AM
>
> Use glst (greylisting) :)
> Allmost 99% of these bad connexions will be elliminated, as 99% will =
never retry.
> And as glst will first response with a 4xx code, no NDR until second =
attempt connexion accepted by glst.
That is a good
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello All...
> >
> > Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
> > for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
> > eMail Servers trys to se
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
>
> Hello All...
>
> Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
> for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
> eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
> the eMa
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Hal Dell
>Envoy=E9 : mercredi 3 octobre 2007 18:10
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Bounced eMail messags
>
>
>
>> Wolfy Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03,
> Wolfy Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:37 AM
>
> Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail
servers.
> When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
>
> Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail serve
Hi,
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
was diligently trying sending NDR's to every single one
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
NOT delivered because of a bad eMail address
19 matches
Mail list logo
