Yeah, happened here too.. Only 4 though. So it's not only you...
RaveRod wrote:
>5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
>loop.
>
>
>This may seems a stupid question but how do I fix this?
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
I received 1 email detected as loop too. I think the problem is with
ecartis.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RaveRod
Sent: 27 avril, 2004 19:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Mail loop detected?
5 emails I just received (fr
On [Tue, 27.04. 23:20], RaveRod wrote:
> 5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
> loop.
>
>
> This may seems a stupid question but how do I fix this?
YOU can't fix it. Since the loop was built by someone else. It seems we all get
those :-P
--
Wiener Hilfswerk
At 23.20 27/04/04 +, you wrote:
>5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
>loop.
>
>This may seems a stupid question but how do I fix this?
Someone with a screwed up MS SMTPSVC mailserver is re-injecting old
messages into the list. The original messages were po
Well, I received you and Liron's messages fine. Seems strange.
At least now I know it's not my mailserver.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred
Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re:
Yeah I noticed those to. So these messages are as good as junk?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francesco Vertova
Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected?
At 23.20 27/04/04 +
At 23.43 27/04/04 +, you wrote:
>Yeah I noticed those to. So these messages are as good as junk?
Yep. Unless you want to keep them to write an ad hoc filter ...
>Someone with a screwed up MS SMTPSVC mailserver is re-injecting old
>messages into the list. The original messages were posted betw
n
>Behalf Of Francesco Vertova
>Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 1:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected?
>
>At 23.20 27/04/04 +, you wrote:
>
>
>>5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
>>loop.
&g
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> Yeah, happened here too.. Only 4 though. So it's not only you...
This was the genius that re-injected messages (I received about 200
bounces for mail loops):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now carefully removed from the list. I miss a feature in Ecartis already.
At 09.11 27/04/04 -0500, you wrote:
>Just for clarity, how would this happen? I thought a mailloop would
>only effect that mailserver??? Confused...
XMail defines a mail loop as a message with more than (by default 16)
Received: headers. It counts these headers and does not try to detect if a
Hey, thanks for the info Francesco!
Ben
Francesco Vertova wrote:
>At 09.11 27/04/04 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>>Just for clarity, how would this happen? I thought a mailloop would
>>only effect that mailserver??? Confused...
>>
>>
>
>XMail defines a mail loop as a message with more than (by
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected?
At 09.11 27/04/04 -0500, you wrote:
>Just for clarity, how would this happen? I thought a mailloop would
>only effect that mailserver??? Confused...
XMail defines a mail loop as a message with more than (by default 16)
Recei
RaveRod wrote:
> <>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
> remove the
> messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
I have not received any more loops. I think Mr. Libenzi fixed this
problem quite quickly and concisely. Thank you very much Mr. Lib
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> RaveRod wrote:
> > <>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
> > remove the
> > messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
>
> I have not received any more loops. I think Mr. Libenzi fixed this
> proble
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
>
>
>>RaveRod wrote:
>>
>>
>>><>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
>>>remove the
>>>messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
>>>
>>>
>>I have not received any more
On Wed, 19 May 2004, ck wrote:
>
> ErrCode = -173
> ErrString = Mail loop detected
> Message blocked by mail loop check !
> SMTP-Error = "554 Message blocked by mail loop check"
>
> What does it mean?
Take a look at the Received: header chain in the message.
- Davide
-
To unsubscrib
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:49 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: "Mail loop detected" on backup MX
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] wrote:
>
> >
> > an email that was sent to my backup MX generated a "Mail loop dete
Francesco Vertova wrote:
>At 12.11 12/05/04 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>Why Xmail decided to use the A record from the next DNS it was
>>able to talk with is beyond me.
>>
>>
>
>My dns reports MX information for bioenergy.com as Non-authoritative. It
>seems - I've seen this other times - that
On Wed, 12 May 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
> Getting a "Mail loop detected" on a domain we host on our DNS server,
> and on our web servers, be do not host the mail (MX record points to
> customers server).
>
> This only happens on mail being sent from our mail server. The
> destination domain
You have an A record that points back to yourself
bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
record exists. Interesting
bioenergy.com. 3529IN MX 10 64.122.83.163.
Bill
>--
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
> You have an A record that points back to yourself
> bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
>
> Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
> record exists. Interesting
> bioenergy.com. 3529IN
gt;To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected - Can't seem to find the problem.
>
>On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
>
>> You have an A record that points back to yourself
>> bioenergy.com. 3580IN A
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
>
>
>
>>You have an A record that points back to yourself
>>bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
>>
>>Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
>>record exists. Interesting
>>bio
At 12.11 12/05/04 -0500, you wrote:
>Why Xmail decided to use the A record from the next DNS it was
>able to talk with is beyond me.
My dns reports MX information for bioenergy.com as Non-authoritative. It
seems - I've seen this other times - that in such a case the XMail internal
resolver fail
24 matches
Mail list logo
