dapt it. Or you could just have a look on its code to seen what it does.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 07/04/08 15:21
Objet: [xmail] Re: SMTP auth on another server
Thanks for your reply Francis,
I need two servers because I don't
rver, what
solutions I have then?
Thanks
-fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis
Sent: 7 avril 2008 04:20
To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP auth on another server
>-Message d'origine
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de fred
>Envoy=E9 : vendredi 4 avril 2008 19:01
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] SMTP auth on another server
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Just a quick question about what I need to do in order to have a =
second
>se
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
> If you use the AUTH command on an normal connection to the server, your
> user name and password would be sent in plain text. A malicious person
> with a packet sniffer would be able to capture the authentication
> details en route.
>
> I was hopi
If you use the AUTH command on an normal connection to the server, your
user name and password would be sent in plain text. A malicious person
with a packet sniffer would be able to capture the authentication
details en route.
I was hoping there would be a way to improve the security of peopl
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
>
> I am currently running XMail 1.23 and have started reading the
> documentation for 1.24 and I had a question that I haven't come across
> the answer to yet.
>
> Is there a way in XMail to stop it advertising SMTP AUTH unless the
> connection is e
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
> Is there any plain to have xmail be able support smtp auth method :
> DIGEST-MD5 ?
You're the only one that requested it, so far. It does not make a case in
my books ;)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail
At 00:16 7/30/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
>Besides, I can write a script with all the grep commands in it and train a
>monkey to handle the initial searches so all I have to look at is log snips
>with relevant info (of course, working for a small company, I have no
>monkeys to train).
You
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:37:54 -0400 Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
> >With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down
> for
> >abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
> >connection log. Especa
At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
>With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down for
>abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
>connection log. Especailly if the user is sending mail while connected via
>some other ISP or corport
Or have them set up and use SMTPAuth, the program.
http://www.software.bisswanger.de/en/index.php?seite=smtp
Gerald
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:00 -0500 Shiloh Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If somebody has an email client that won't support SMTP AUTH, =
> convince
> then to upgrade to a v
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:16:11 -0400 Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> >Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
> >AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
> >especially when one of the PCs gets a
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
>Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
>AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
>especially when one of the PCs gets a virus on it. Even using POP
>before SMTP is a bad idea in my opinion becaus
If you do not want to require SMTP AUTH, you could list your local IP
addresses in the smtprelay.tab file. Then those IPs could relay without
authentication.
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 19:32 +0200, Philippe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wan't to authorize any one on my lan to send mail with my xmail Server (without
> authentication)
>
> With Mozilla 1.6 or Outook Express 6, no problem
> With Netscape 4.78 (i know it's old), it ask me user login. Of course the POP
If your users are on an internal LAN put that address range in the
smtprelay.tab file. You don't want to turn off authentication completely
or you will have an open relay on the Internet.
Bill
>--
>From: Xat[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:08 AM
>To:[EMAIL P
> What should be changed to allow users to send their mail
> without preliminary POP3 authentication?
smtprelay.tab ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Toby Reiter wrote:
>
> Ok,
> I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
> thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
>
> a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
> existing mail users from sending out me
You don't want to use mail-auth it is for a different purpose. You and
to edit smtprelay.tab, only list your local lan and anyone not on that
lan will have to authenticate to send messages through your server.
Bill
>--
>From: Javi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 4:4
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Javi wrote:
>
> Hello again!
>
> As you can read on subject field, i'd like to activate smtp auth for users
> who are not in my LAN at home. I tried to uncomment the line "SmtpConfig"
> "mail-auth", then i edited "userauth/smtp/correo.perezmesseri.com" with this
> line
> "log
You need not edit the settings for mail-auth, if you enable it, it will not
be possbile to relay messages to users on your server.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Javi
Enviado el: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:48 PM
Para: xmail
Asunto: [xmail] SMTP a
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:47 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth
>
> Working with the files that come with the distribution you want to do
> the following:
> Empty smtprelay.tab
> In server.tab put
> "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3""
Working with the files that come with the distribution you want to do
the following:
Empty smtprelay.tab
In server.tab put
"EnableAuthSMTP-POP3""0"
That's it. Anyone or thing that tries to send mail to your server that
isn't to a local domain will have to send authentication.
>From what you hav
t: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
>
>yes.
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:32 PM
>Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
>
>>
>&
> yes.
http://learn.to/quote :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:32 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
> So when you disabled the setting does it ask for a password now?
>
> Bill
>
So when you disabled the setting does it ask for a password now?
Bill
>--
>From: CR Little[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:50 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
>
>both servers are running X
both servers are running Xmail 1.9
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
> By default EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 is enabled. You are probably
blems sending mail to non-local domains unless you send
authentication first.
Is you other server an older version?
Bill
>--
>From: CR Little[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:55 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Au
nd it
askes for a username and password when sending mail?
Any Ideas? smtpauth.tab is empty also on both servers.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:17 PM
> Subject
me and password when sending mail?
Any Ideas? smtpauth.tab is empty also on both servers.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:17 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
> Well re
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
>
>Bill Healy wrote:
>
>>You don't want to use SMTPAUTH.TAB that will affect any other mail
>>servers trying to send you messages as well. All you need to do is empty
>>the smtprelay.tab file or
Bill Healy wrote:
>You don't want to use SMTPAUTH.TAB that will affect any other mail
>servers trying to send you messages as well. All you need to do is empty
>the smtprelay.tab file or just put in your local LAN subnets and you are
>done. Have your users turn ON send Authentication for Outgoin
send non-local mail.
Bill
>--
>From: Brandon Wittenburg[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:51 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>|> >
>>>>|>
www.12a17.org
> ICQ # : 165600200
> AIM / YIM / MSN ID: hbangv
> IRC : irc.12a17.org 6667 / #A17Online
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20
> ---------
>
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
that would be great
you could either use an extra e.g. X-SMTP-Authentication header
or maybe the last "received: (...) from"-line
Davide Libenzi schrieb:
>
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Henrik Steffen wrote:
>
> > sorry, davide, this was not the case
> >
> > I smtp-authenticate as [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> You do not need to explicitly set SMTP auth, but if your MUA does not do a
> POP3 fetch before SMTP send, you'll get an error the first time you send.
>
I'm just getting dumber and dumber today. I just didn't make that obvious
connection. Ginko-Bibola anyone?
Thanks again
Scott
-
To unsu
One last minor thing.. Its more of an Outlook question.
It seems that I don't have to set the Outgoing Mail Server Auth at all. It
seems it will do the smtp-pop3 auth without the consent of the user. Can
anyone confirm this?
Scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xma
> If your smtprelay is empty and if you can relay from different IPs without
> doing a previous POP3 login the only way to explain it is that your MUA
> are using authentication.
>
>
Ahhh, your right. In my last tests I was only using Outlook, Pine no-longer
relays.
Did a few tests on Outlook5.
>
> Are you sure your smtprelay.tab is empty ?
>
yep
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sorry, davide, this was not the case
I smtp-authenticate as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but claim to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the headers showed [EMAIL PROTECTED], not a single one showed
the smtp-authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davide Libenzi schrieb:
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Henrik Steffen wrot
wouldn't it be nice to have the smtp-auth user somewhere in the headers?
Davide Libenzi schrieb:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Henrik Steffen wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just tried the following:
> >
> > on our server there are two domains:
> >
> > foo.com
> > bar.com
> >
> > Say, I am user
42 matches
Mail list logo
