-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de fred
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 4 avril 2008 19:01
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] SMTP auth on another server
Hi,
Just a quick question about what I need to do in order to have a =
second
server only
solutions I have then?
Thanks
-fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis
Sent: 7 avril 2008 04:20
To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP auth on another server
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 07/04/08 15:21
Objet: [xmail] Re: SMTP auth on another server
Thanks for your reply Francis,
I need two servers because I don't want all my users to bow down my
server
with their outgoing emails, right now they use their ISP outgoing
servers
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
If you use the AUTH command on an normal connection to the server, your
user name and password would be sent in plain text. A malicious person
with a packet sniffer would be able to capture the authentication
details en route.
I was hoping
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
I am currently running XMail 1.23 and have started reading the
documentation for 1.24 and I had a question that I haven't come across
the answer to yet.
Is there a way in XMail to stop it advertising SMTP AUTH unless the
connection is
If you use the AUTH command on an normal connection to the server, your
user name and password would be sent in plain text. A malicious person
with a packet sniffer would be able to capture the authentication
details en route.
I was hoping there would be a way to improve the security of
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Is there any plain to have xmail be able support smtp auth method :
DIGEST-MD5 ?
You're the only one that requested it, so far. It does not make a case in
my books ;)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:37:54 -0400 Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down
for
abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
connection log. Especailly if
At 00:16 7/30/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
Besides, I can write a script with all the grep commands in it and train a
monkey to handle the initial searches so all I have to look at is log snips
with relevant info (of course, working for a small company, I have no
monkeys to train).
You
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 19:32 +0200, Philippe wrote:
Hello,
I wan't to authorize any one on my lan to send mail with my xmail Server (without
authentication)
With Mozilla 1.6 or Outook Express 6, no problem
With Netscape 4.78 (i know it's old), it ask me user login. Of course the POP3
If you do not want to require SMTP AUTH, you could list your local IP
addresses in the smtprelay.tab file. Then those IPs could relay without
authentication.
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
especially when one of the PCs gets a virus on it. Even using POP
before SMTP is a bad idea in my opinion because
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:16:11 -0400 Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
especially when one of the PCs gets a virus
Or have them set up and use SMTPAuth, the program.
http://www.software.bisswanger.de/en/index.php?seite=smtp
Gerald
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:00 -0500 Shiloh Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If somebody has an email client that won't support SMTP AUTH, =
convince
then to upgrade to a
At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down for
abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
connection log. Especailly if the user is sending mail while connected via
some other ISP or corportae
What should be changed to allow users to send their mail
without preliminary POP3 authentication?
smtprelay.tab ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a
If your users are on an internal LAN put that address range in the
smtprelay.tab file. You don't want to turn off authentication completely
or you will have an open relay on the Internet.
Bill
--
From: Xat[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:08 AM
To:[EMAIL
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Toby Reiter wrote:
Ok,
I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
existing mail users from sending out messages
You don't want to use mail-auth it is for a different purpose. You and
to edit smtprelay.tab, only list your local lan and anyone not on that
lan will have to authenticate to send messages through your server.
Bill
--
From: Javi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 4:48
You need not edit the settings for mail-auth, if you enable it, it will not
be possbile to relay messages to users on your server.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Javi
Enviado el: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:48 PM
Para: xmail
Asunto: [xmail] SMTP
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Javi wrote:
Hello again!
As you can read on subject field, i'd like to activate smtp auth for users
who are not in my LAN at home. I tried to uncomment the line SmtpConfig
mail-auth, then i edited userauth/smtp/correo.perezmesseri.com with this
line
login user
Working with the files that come with the distribution you want to do
the following:
Empty smtprelay.tab
In server.tab put
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3tab0
That's it. Anyone or thing that tries to send mail to your server that
isn't to a local domain will have to send authentication.
From what you have
yes.
http://learn.to/quote :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
non-local mail.
Bill
--
From: Brandon Wittenburg[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:51 PM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
|
|
| Hmm... I have AllowSmtpVRFY 1 in my server.tab, but my server =
is
| allowing my clients
: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
Bill Healy wrote:
You don't want to use SMTPAUTH.TAB that will affect any other mail
servers trying to send you messages as well. All you need to do is empty
the smtprelay.tab file or just put in your local LAN subnets and you are
done. Have your users turn ON send
mail?
Any Ideas? smtpauth.tab is empty also on both servers.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:17 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
Well regardless it's not needed as xmail will check mailusers.tab
both servers are running Xmail 1.9
- Original Message -
From: Bill Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
By default EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 is enabled. You are probably POPing mail
before sending so
So when you disabled the setting does it ask for a password now?
Bill
--
From: CR Little[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:50 PM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
both servers are running Xmail 1.9
- Original Message
Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
|Behalf Of Tracy
|Sent: vendredi 23 ao=C3=BBt 2002 21:18
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [xmail] Re: SMTP Auth setup
|
|And if I knew exactly how to answer that, I'd be happy to...:)
|Unfortunately, I don't
You do not need to explicitly set SMTP auth, but if your MUA does not do a
POP3 fetch before SMTP send, you'll get an error the first time you send.
I'm just getting dumber and dumber today. I just didn't make that obvious
connection. Ginko-Bibola anyone?
Thanks again
Scott
-
To
that would be great
you could either use an extra e.g. X-SMTP-Authentication header
or maybe the last received: (...) from-line
Davide Libenzi schrieb:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Henrik Steffen wrote:
sorry, davide, this was not the case
I smtp-authenticate as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but claim
sorry, davide, this was not the case
I smtp-authenticate as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but claim to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the headers showed [EMAIL PROTECTED], not a single one showed
the smtp-authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davide Libenzi schrieb:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Henrik Steffen
wouldn't it be nice to have the smtp-auth user somewhere in the headers?
Davide Libenzi schrieb:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Henrik Steffen wrote:
Hi all,
I just tried the following:
on our server there are two domains:
foo.com
bar.com
Say, I am user at foo.com - e.g. [EMAIL
33 matches
Mail list logo
